Chapter 2. Maternal democracy (Mominism) Suitable for Newcomers
Today, democracy has become a universal value, and liberal distribution that allows unlimited possession is the mainstream. In other words, it refers to the establishment of capitalism through the development of science and technology and the industrial revolution as the West, which was a paternalistic new capitalist society, experienced an era of uncertainty, and absolutism declined, and relativism became the mainstream.
However, capitalism, which overlooks the fact that humans are cultural beings that must achieve a balance of spirituality, has been revealing its limitations since the global era. Of course, associations are expanding for the globalization of a new distribution style that balances the ‘life of relationship’ beyond capitalism that is biased toward the ‘life of possession’.
In other words, due to the sharpening of interests due to human commercialization, doubts about life are rising due to the explosive increase in laws and regulations, the development of techniques for maximum profit, the spread of commercial attitudes, and absolute polarization.
In addition, most people think that capitalism makes them feel “poverty in abundance” or that they live an unhappy life due to polarization. In fact, it has become a dangerous society that humans cannot handle due to the depletion of global resources, environmental destruction, and pressure for a dark future, along with various types of capitalist syndrome.
This is because capitalism, which stimulates and cultivates original instincts, has made the subject an object. Therefore, in order for humans to live a happy life as a subject, a political culture for globalization of a new maternal distribution style must be formed.
1. Aiming for the life of being
Adamsmith’s economics was created the latest in comparison to other disciplines because the economy of the old era was small as a part of religion or politics. However, it can be said that after the Industrial Revolution, the size of the economy grew, a modern civil society was established through the Civil Revolution, and a capitalist society based on economic liberalism became an economic priority.
In other words, the West, a paternalistic neo-capitalist society, underwent an era of uncertainty to recognize humanism anew, and as empiricism developed, the economy was able to become independent from politics due to the development of democracy and science and technology. In other words, it refers to capitalism embodied along with economic liberalism and commercialism, which are confident that they can escape the fear of poverty and hunger through free competition that excludes state interference.
In other words, with the establishment of a modern democracy based on decentralization, religion, politics, and the economy were separated, and it progressed into a society centered on the economy as a private domain. Therefore, it can be understood that ancient society was transformed into politics for religion, politics for politics for the people, and politics for the economy from modern society.
For example, the need for economics was not felt in the old days due to the proportion of power and possession, but it can be understood from the fact that economics was established after the establishment of modern society in order to create abundant materials through free competition. In other words, since the establishment of modern civil society, the economy of metaphysics has been equipped with the ability to change form as an independent and practical force.
This can be understood from the fact that Marx argued in his materialistic dialectic that the economy was the center of the modern society. Of course, it can be understood that the modern state is an economy-first society in that it is a functional state that seeks to be faithful to the nature of capitalism.
In other words, unlike the non-economic and ideological politics and religion that controlled the metaphysical economy of absolute feudalism, after modern society was established, metaphysical economics became the goal, and so-called monetism, a value-transfer phenomenon in which religion became a means, became the zeitgeist. In other words, ancient times were political animals, modern times politics and economy were separated, and today they live as economic animals.
In other words, it means that as a cultural being, humans are recreating their lives in accordance with their environment. For example, the fact that people were believed to be the descendants of the monotheistic mother in the middle of the family and to have endless potential with the ability to recreate them can be understood from the fact that they were the descendants of the monotheistic mother. For reference, religion, politics, and economy have developed in combination since ancient times, and as a result, they are not as clearly distinguished as cutting tofu as a priority.
However, there is a clear difference in that in the mid-term maternal neo-bonist society, the paternal society has been looking for answers in the Life of Ownership since its emergence to this day, and the maternal neo-bonist society, which believed in soul immortality and rebirth, was peaceful, while the paternal society based on the private system was unstable as a one-time life.
In other words, the society of the new mother-in-law lived a “life of existence” like a community of faith as a training process in which humans must be learned as descendants of the god-in-law and people born on Earth, one of the many stars (planets), as a descendant of the god-in-law. This is because the society of the mother-in-law firmly believed in the “words” that the mother-in-law should return to his hometown by practicing various forms of sharing (love) that help humans themselves as a favor (recommendation) of the god-in-law.
In other words, the society of the mother-in-law lived a life to return to the human home beyond the reincarnation of life on Earth. In other words, the car was abandoned, but the driver believed that it would circulate and progress to reach a certain level, as if he were choosing a new car and running. This can be understood in the traditional Korean ‘Thank you faith’ that comfort the animal soul or make a simple sacrifice when killing an animal, thinking that the Earth is a place to stay for a while and then come back.
Additionally, ancient Korean folktales convey a variety of circular content. Additionally, it is possible to comprehend the mother-in-law society through the cooling of hot water in the yard of the house to prevent the death of life like microorganisms and earthworms, and the life habits of the mother-in-law that desired to coexist with animals by leaving the fruit of a tree called magpie rice.
In addition, feng shui geography based on the philosophy of the Yin-Yang and Five Elements of the East can be understood from the fact that motherhood is at the center of the cycle in the Jangmyo culture, which emphasized “Mtaek” as a cemetery along with housing sites and architecture. As such, it can be seen that the tradition of the Mogye clan, which ultimately wished for a happier life for their descendants than their own lives, continues.
As a result of the long-standing domination and solidification of consciousness by the paternal society, the practice of the maternal has continued as the maternal value has been absorbed or transformed into the paternal system.
Therefore, it can be seen that in order to overcome a dangerous society caused by the paternal distribution style for a long time, an institutional mechanism is needed to globalize the democratic (parental) distribution style that balances the maternal centripetal power and the paternal centrifugal power to lead a harmonious life so that people can live a ‘relationship life’.
1.1 The Life of Possession Made Misfortune
Capitalism, which cultivates materialism, has created a dangerous society as it marginalizes humans. In other words, capitalism allows humans to live as ‘economic animals’ rather than subjects due to the contradiction of ‘poverty in abundance’, environmental pollution, and absolute polarization. Professor Heilbroner describes this risk of capitalism as follows.
“When talking about capitalism in the 21st century, these are the issues that should be noted. In other words, not to mention the problems of war, they are popular hysteria, life-threatening technological progress, population expansion in the underdeveloped world, and other lethargic possibilities.” (116) (Haylbroner, 133p) This is understandable by recalling that today’s neoliberalism has made an economist’s point of concern that capitalism will become a dangerous society as it develops.
In other words, as the economy works in combination with ideological things beyond the realm of matter, the economy has already become so bloated that it cannot be seen only metaphysically, dominating human consciousness. In other words, by creating a metaphysical idea of monetarism, even non-economic sectors such as politics and religion are included in the realm of the economy. As everything is commercialized, capitalism is making even things that cannot be converted into money, such as air, water, ecosystems, and life, cheap.
For example, it can be understood as the exit of numerous companies as corporate profits decrease, just as coal mining decreases and goes deeper and becomes less profitable. In other words, it has become a high-employment society due to the fall of many mid-sized companies and employment cuts, and is struggling with the explosive welfare demand caused by the fall of small business owners due to the decrease in effective demand, and at the same time, chronic fiscal deficits due to the limit of people’s courage caused by the collapse of small business owners.
Of course, the capitalist government is using a desperate policy of monetary expansion to overcome this complex situation, but it has not escaped the vicious cycle of accelerating polarization due to inflation caused by this. Of course, modern countries are controlling the economy by expanding their currencies to some extent in order to stabilize the economy.
Professor Friedmann, for example, says about 4% is appropriate. However, the problem is that if the government’s increased investment in stimulating the economy causes money issuance to exceed its real value, inflation caused by inflation after a certain period of time will shrink consumption, causing the so-called “high-cost, low-efficiency” stagflation caused by the recession.
This phenomenon is the reason why the majority of the wealthy fall into the poor as inflation increases the burden on the socially underprivileged and the poor. In other words, all mankind will be unhappy. For example, the wealthy with government bonds or gold accumulate wealth as society develops with significant transplants, but the poor become poor as they become impoverished.
Therefore, capitalism’s emphasis on creating a happy life through a ‘life of possession’ was somewhat appropriate in the early capitalist era, but it is inappropriate in the global era. For example, it can be understood from the fact that absolute polarization is being formed rather than national capitalism as modified capitalism, which increased effective demand by expanding government investment or welfare.
In other words, neoliberalism centered on developed countries has increased effective demand by reducing welfare, dividing the world, strengthening free trade, and revitalizing international finance, failing to overcome stagflation, a chronic disease in developed countries. Of course, in the name of ‘cultural conflict’ to alleviate or avoid the occurrence of panic, they used to solve their own economic problems by making them look like religious wars or ideological disputes.
However, after the fall of the Cold War, transnational multinational corporations competed indefinitely to achieve maximum profits, making economic regulation impossible. Moreover, capitalism’s infantile attitude of ‘loss of concession’ is causing an unfortunate life. Therefore, it can be seen that today’s free enterprises that compete indefinitely in global capitalism are transformed into an aggressive attitude that is faithful to the nature of transfer fighting, and at the same time, as the real economy is stagnating, an active welfare society of the parent democracy based on the maternal distribution style should be universalized.
2. An era of post-paternityism
Most large companies not only have non-market non-essential defense industries linked to national plans or industries to carry out national projects such as civil engineering and construction, but also develop and deliver munitions necessary for war or counterterrorism with government-owned science and technology and policy funds.
It is also the first to participate in government investment to stimulate the economy, hiring bureaucrats for government demand and supplying political funds to strengthen huge capital accumulation and free enterpriseism. This allows large corporations closely related to the state to expand their businesses in the market sector, such as food, daily necessities, and services, by accumulating capital formed by the government’s investment in advanced science and technology that require a considerable period of time and large capital.
In other words, it was an opportunity for large corporations to expand into the global market, and it was the cause of the emergence of neoliberalism for infinite accumulation in the expanded global market as the Third World was incorporated into capitalism due to the collapse of the Cold War system. As such, it can be seen that capitalism has become a highly unemployed society due to countless companies that are expelled if they create giant companies over time.
Of course, neoliberalism is different from the situation in which imperialism was formed when free enterprises represented the government’s difficulty in intervening for moral and external reasons in early capitalism. Today, however, underdeveloped capitalist countries are wary of neo-imperialism or hegemony as polarization becomes global due to the infinite accumulation of transnational multinational corporations that can exist on their own.
In other words, underdeveloped countries suspect that neoliberalism was created because the market needed to expand to overcome the panic caused by the slowdown in consumption as advanced countries became a highly unemployed society due to the increase of automatic production facilities of high-quality products with advanced science and technology.
This is due to hostile mergers of multinational giants with excellent technology and management experience, the collapse of small and medium-sized enterprises due to speculative funds, and management interference with equity investments, which are causing companies that produce market items. Therefore, it is clear why underdeveloped countries reject neoliberalism, which was created to be faithful to economic liberalism after the Cold War, because protectionism against underdeveloped countries made up of concessions from advanced countries in the Cold War system.
In the past, European countries turned colonies into debtors, legally exploiting various interests and resources to become permanent poor countries, but individuals enslaved colonial people through the joint guarantee system as a way to secure bonds for debt repayment. The harsh experience of exploitation and exploitation remains an after-effect to this day as a result of the conflict and distrust caused by the denial of the identity of traditional values.
Of course, during the imperialist era, even countries with a long history that could not be converted into money became colonies due to national debt, and had a harsh experience. In other words, capitalism was found to be a powerful tool for commercializing and enslaving humans. In addition, even though capitalism based on individualism presupposes individual responsibility, it understood the nature of capitalism as it solidified colonial rule with a system of associations that emphasized human solidarity.
In other words, it was deeply imprinted that capitalism was inconsistent, saying that anything for profit could be done, as if it were an earring or a nose holder if it were hung on the ear. Moreover, today, multinational corporations composed of multiple ethnic groups have existed in the global community like a liberal kingdom with the identity of monetarism. Of course, it can be seen as the cause of the formation of multilateralism today.
In other words, large corporations not only dominate the global market like fish in water, but also play a significant role in international politics as a world of simultaneous information and communication made up of cutting-edge science. In addition, global polarization accelerates, such as the management of speculative funds centered on advanced countries, controlling companies through hostile mergers, or transplanting them into stocks or bonds, contributing to polarization of businesses and countries.
Therefore, capitalism is a system that creates a dangerous society that is the overall result of overconsumption, resource depletion, environmental pollution, absolute polarization, and human degradation caused by excessive competition. For example, today’s Wall Street in the United States is criticizing reality with the slogan 1% Thief and 99% Crisis. This can be understood in Professor Heilbronner’s following article.
“It’s not just capitalism, it’s also the problems facing humanity that there are wars, hysteria and signs of death in the socialist system. …. They’re not just ‘capitalist’ issues in light of what happened in places where Soviet-style socialism dominated the world order,” he said. (117) (Hailbrenner, 133p)
In addition, he said, “The principle of social integration is participation. In other words, it is a society based on the promise that all citizens will mutually determine all aspects of economic life through discussion and voting.” (118) (Hailebroner, 141p) In other words, it implies that mankind must live with a new distribution system as post-capitalism for a happy life.
Citizens themselves should actively participate in establishing a political and economic system for the globalization of a new distribution style. This is because, as the liberal democratic constitution guarantees freedom of assembly association, there must be organizational power to establish a system for the globalization of the maternal distribution style. Of course, as gender discrimination that has continued the old era remains emotional to this day, female political leaders should be fostered, and women should actively participate in politics.
There are good female political leaders today, but on average, there is a 10-1 difference from men. Therefore, it can be seen that women should be the subjects and use their logic as an organizational principle to be 5-5. Of course, today women are working as international NGOs for the post-capitalist green life movement.
Additionally, American women fought in the 1970s with the same meaning as the end of paternalism. Of course, it can be said that while there was no ideology that could fundamentally change the social system, it remained at the level of expressing peripheral dissatisfaction by becoming neighbors of the system created by men and not being able to make their voices heard due to the poverty of philosophy.
This is due to the fact that when women, unlike men, become a mother who changes to one level, they not only miss the golden age of cultivating skills due to the burden of childbirth and parenting, but also participate later than men in social participation and organizational life. Also, because the status of women is linked to the status of patriarch, there is a problem that it is difficult to organize due to the gap between women.
This is due to the fact that, in contrast to men who are discriminated against by competitiveness, women have differences between them due to the patriarch’s ability regardless of their ability. Therefore, it can be seen that in order for women to lead society as a subject, a system suitable for ecologically welfare and democratic women must be established to revitalize the organization and achieve a balance of 5 to 5.
In medieval Europe, where liberal ideas based on natural law were embodied, women were so marginalized that there was a ‘ultra-night right’ in the 17th and 18th centuries. However, even after modern democracy was established through the civil revolution, they were treated poorly as inferior beings, but began to improve at the end of the 19th century due to the struggles of women. Later, in the early 20th century, they won the right to vote and obtained the right to vote, and despite the recent activities of feminism (women’s socialism), gender discrimination remains.
In other words, in today’s passive welfare society, gender equality must be achieved only when history is developed into an active welfare society based on the maternal distribution style. Therefore, it can be seen that maternal democracy, which solidifies democracy, the ideal of humanity, should be globalized beyond neoliberalism, which is unfavorable to welfare women.
This is because democracy cannot remain only as a procedural definition for liberalism in the era of the global village, as democracy, which is the ideal of humanity, must be solidified, and economic democratization must be globalized to realize an active welfare society as economic democracy, the essence of democracy. Of course, in the era of the global village, where an active welfare society must be realized, women should play a leading role in life politics as they are ecologically welfare and democratic.
In other words, it means that the matriarch is appropriate to realize a maternal distribution style that fits the nature of democracy for the new generation. In other words, gender discrimination has occurred in modern society, but just as the growth of the passport has accelerated from the passive welfare state (modified capitalism), gender equality should be achieved by creating and leading an active welfare society suitable for women.
Of course, it can be said that women are already capable of globalizing an active welfare society based on a maternal distribution style as ecologically welfare women have formed a passive welfare state by forming a coalition to realize a welfare society. This is because women and youth workers who were lower than slaves in early capitalism, which justified exploitation, were economical, so they lived a harsh life and had wisdom enough to expel slavery.
For example, as early capitalism was a light industry-oriented industrial structure, women were mainly wage workers who assisted technicians or worked idly, and when capital accumulated capitalists moved low-level labor-intensive factories to colonies for maximum profit, women even declined to prostitute.
In other words, modern society is only a formal gender equality for free competition, but in reality, it participated as a substructure for men due to the need for industrialization. As such, women who have been subjected to extreme discrimination of 10-1 for a long time have been able to form enough power (withstanding) to lead the world.
This can be understood from the fact that women’s low wages became possible to participate in society, and industrialization became strong by cultivating their own power as the population concentrated in the city and became a nuclear family, and that many extraordinary women were produced, leading Western women to later lead the global women’s movement.
2.1 The Social Implementation of the Gender Equality Index of 5 to 5
If you don’t like capitalism as humanity’s universal lifestyle today, you should be prepared to live on a desert island like Robinson Crusoe or participate in a political association to realize a post-capitalist world. For example, as capitalism based on a paternal distribution style is unfavorable to women, capitalism has been revised as a result of women’s associations to fulfill the legitimacy of the welfare state in a society of paternal bias.
Of course, after the establishment of the modern society, men’s human rights increased dramatically, while the height of the passport improved to some extent, and gender discrimination remained. Therefore, even after the establishment of the modern society, even if inequality continues in a state of global village, it can be seen that there is no change in form and content in the future, so public discussion and association should be made so that gender equality becomes 5-5.
This is because, as an axis of the world, women declared that they were equal to men after the establishment of modern society, but it can be seen to have deviated from the level of alienation as it is a decision-making standard at the 10-1 level. The problem is that as capitalism developed, the central power of humanity weakened due to the commercialization of women who reinvent humans.
In other words, capitalism is not only a system that contradicts the modern society established on the basis of human dignity by commercializing human beings as the subject, but has also become a dangerous society in which women have fallen into sexual existence. In addition, unlike the wealth of the old aristocrats with social responsibility, capitalist society has become an absolute majority of the socially weak due to absolute polarization due to overheated competition for accumulation due to appointment without social responsibility.
As a result, it can be seen that as a result of capitalist society encouraging mass consumption, environmental pollution and global warming are paying the price, and humans are commercialized and their bodies and minds are getting sick. In other words, early capitalism emphasized that selfish life appears as a result of the public good, but capitalism, which is motivated by selfishness, is running counter to the public good as a result. In other words, capitalism that fosters a selfish mentality without social responsibility cannot implement the public good.
Furthermore, as a result of promoting globalization based on monetaryism, there are signs of increased complexity caused by polarization or hostility, and of a disaster that humanity cannot handle along with the explosion of conflict. In other words, from an oriental point of view, it is a phenomenon caused by greed that causes a microcosm man linked to the macrocosm to forget his responsibility despite being the top manager of the Earth and having a responsibility for coexistence.
Therefore, in order to harmonize with a selfish life as a part of the public good as a whole, it can be expected that the disaster will disappear and become a sustainable society only when the ‘ownership upper and lower limits’, which is the distribution style of the mother democracy, are globalized. Therefore, it can be seen that ‘mother democracy’ that can solidify democracy should be globalized, just like the society of mother-in-law, which implemented an active welfare society based on the theory that human nature is fundamentally good in the era of global village.
In other words, the global village era is a life politics era that can realize a win-win life, welfare orientation, respect for life, environmental priority, pacifism, decentralization, depolarization, life politics, improved quality of life, and life of existence as maternal values.
Of course, it can be expected that maternal democracy will become more common, considering that women are solidarity with international NGOs to launch the Green Life Movement. This is due to the fact that women who invariably reinvent life from time immemorial instinctively reject life-threatening systems.
For example, in a capitalist society, the green movement for women’s lives warns of the dangers of capitalism and practices environmental movements, despite the fact that women are the ones who have to take risks and damages. Therefore, it can be understood that women should actively participate in political parties they have created to encourage government support so that the maternal distribution style becomes a universal value for a sustainable society. This is because it is like compensation for historical facts that have suppressed and abused women.
2.2 Social rewards of domestic work
As capitalism degenerated men into money-making machines and women like machine parts, unlike classical patriarchy, today’s patriarchy has been reduced to a light, apricot-like patriarch with only a duty to support rather than rights.
In other words, patriarchs were authoritative in the past, bearing many parts such as family education, income security, foreign relations, and support responsibilities, but today patriarchs cannot handle family complaints caused by improvements in living standards, overconsumption, polarization, and poverty in abundance.
For example, despite being in a position to give up traditional wealth on its own today, family dissolution is exploding as the number of patriarchs cannot cope with abuse of unresponsible rights like old-fashioned armbands, family members with dissatisfaction think of patriarchs as a money-making machine, or arbitrarily interpret and distort the meaning of family members.
Therefore, considering the reality that patriarchy is becoming a sandwich at home and in society as society develops, patriarchy based on paternalism is no longer meaningful. Therefore, it is understandable that a new family system that mixes the mother-in-law system as ‘non-bloodism’ is necessary for newcomers who realize that they are spiritual beings.
This is because as neoliberalism forms personalization and absolute polarization, the number of mother and child families due to the dissolution of numerous families is exploding. For example, in modern Korea, traditional family law can be revised to select a surname, whether a father or a mother, according to the principle of gender equality, and a combination would be an example.
As a result, there is a need for a new system that can globalize the distribution of allowances as necessary for motherhood, the centripetal force of human beings. In other words, beyond capitalism, which has fulfilled its mission by opening the era of the global village, democracy based on maternal values should be globalized as a complete democracy that matches form and content.
This is because as capitalism solidifies into neoliberalism and puts democracy in crisis, humanity is in a state where it can be sunk by human devastation, which is more powerful than the disaster caused by environmental destruction.
In addition, the capitalist distribution style that solidifies monetarism that puts democracy at risk should be expelled if humans are reminded of the fact that they have set democracy as an ideal based on self-righteous and violent paternalism that has been brutally dealt with and tested in extreme situations.
And with the development of capitalism, social costs such as the expansion of state organizations, security, welfare, and administrative costs are exploding, and serious phenomena such as resource depletion due to overconsumption, food loss caused by environmental pollution, and astronomical costs caused by natural disasters caused by warming can no longer be neglected. Therefore, it can be seen that in the era of the global community, the ‘ownership limit system of the mother democracy’ to live a ‘life of relationships’ should be common.
In any case, due to the complexity of modern society, people are having difficulties in a structure that is difficult to link with each other due to the increase in what they need to learn, unlike in the past, and the specialization of home education, school education, social education, and vocational training. In other words, as it contradicts the whole personality, most people are going through a difficult process, and they often end their lives while living a life that cannot afford to contemplate the ultimate meaning of life.
This is the result of excessive competition caused by the cultivation of capitalist humanity through a specialization process starting with competition for superiority and inferiority from school education. In particular, capitalist humanity is formed between families, and family dissolution is increasing, and a new system is needed as the number of families with deficits or family selfish tendencies intensifies or singles increases.
Therefore, it can be seen that a system based on a maternal distribution style that mitigates competition should be established. In other words, a maternal democracy that can realize an active welfare society that seeks to realize a stable society through family welfare must be established. Of course, since housework is related to the life and death of the family, such as childbirth, parenting, and care, the maternal value recognized as the basic labor that forms the basis of society should be generalized.
3. A system for a win-win life
3.1 Progress from passive welfare to active welfare
As a result of exploring the truth to solve questions about oneself, humans achieved science and technology civilization, created democracy with philosophical relativism as humanism, became the subject of historical development on their own, and made breakthrough development by building knowledge and culture.
It can be seen that this is ultimately historically developing into a system that can realize a rich mental civilization. Of course, the material civilization that capitalism achieved by motivating human desire for materiality can be seen as a process for mental civilization. Therefore, it can be seen that it is necessary to progress from the ‘life of possession’ to the ‘life of relationships’ required by the global village era.
In other words, a happy life can only be lived when a new maternal distribution style is generalized. For example, capitalism can be understood in the fact that even politics that values justification fosters a normal-race politics in collaboration with commercialism that pursues practicality, leaving the majority of people unhappy.
This is because, in a capitalist society, capitalists do not bear political responsibility, and politicians must take historical responsibility, so they have no choice but to pursue practical benefits like merchants faithful to capitalist attributes and be passive in social integration rather than unreasonable reform. This is because, of course, in a capitalist society, everyone is responsible only when they have income.
In other words, a capitalist society is a system that justifies everyone’s living for subsistence. Therefore, it can be understood that capitalism is a system that is difficult to escape from the vicious cycle of explosive increase in social costs and loss of humanity caused by distrust and instability.
For example, neoliberalism, in which transnational giants want to free up infinite competition in one world, is evident in the fact that the global economy has been in a deep and widespread recession due to global polarization and the recent frequent international financial crisis. The problem is that the crisis caused by global capitalism is more severe than national capitalism, and an unpredictable crisis is formed over a long period of time.
This can be seen from the fact that neoliberalism has become a dangerous society as a result of stimulating the endless desire for possession and fostering selfishness, just as imperialism formed by capitalism caused two world wars. The Communist Party’s failure can illustrate how powerful capitalism is. Of course, capitalism, a framework of desire created by cultivating selfishness, promotes the excellence of capitalism and justifies the solidification of capitalism.
However, as it contradicts the modern spirit based on natural law ideology, more and more people consider civilization as barbarism disguised. This can be understood from the fact that terrorism is becoming a dangerous society in today’s world, unlike early capitalism, as neoliberalism, created by high-tech and astronomical economic scale, accelerates absolute polarization and becomes a dangerous society.
For example, the post-capitalist green life movement is being practiced, and various new welfare communities are being created for the ‘life of relationships’ in many parts of the world. Of course, in the era of the global village, a system will be established to develop history and develop into an active welfare society beyond national capitalism, which embodies a passive welfare society.
In other words, maternal democracy should be the universal value of the world in the global village era as a complete democracy that matches the form and content of democracy. Of course, human beings will choose maternalism because they are cultural beings who obey, defend, and live in the value order they created themselves by creating a rational system to overcome the difficulties of reality.
This is because mankind’s first grand coalition of matriarchs (faith communities), where father-in-law and mother-in-law were already in balance, experienced a win-win life through sharing for thousands of years. In other words, humans can progress to an active welfare society as they are creative beings who can give themselves the ultimate meaning of life while endlessly recreating.
In other words, we must live a ‘win-win life’ in the form of maternal distribution living in the era of the global village. Of course, the fact that the original religion of the mid-term maternal society based on maternal love as a human centripetal force is still the root of religion to this day and that the shared system was used as a means of sharing can be referenced.
This is because humans have lived on the basis of accumulated social assets such as lifestyle, material, and mental assets that they have achieved through social cooperation since time immemorial. Therefore, it can be seen that individualism is undermining the bond formed through human continuity (historicality) by allowing people to live as if they were falling from the sky. Therefore, it can be seen that the creation of a dangerous society is due to the loss of bonds by privatizing the social assets that individualism achieved through social cooperation.
For example, the fact that human sociality is being cultivated by education, a social asset, can be understood from the fact that two- and eight-year-old girls were found in a wolf cave in Midnapore, India in 1920 and in the case of Kamala and Amala, two-year-old Kamala died a year after the two girls were rescued, and two-year-old Kamala learned human words and actions through six years of education, but died before the age of 10.
In other words, human beings are made human by social assets. Therefore, it can be seen that historical development is opposed to the idea of a dangerous society by privatizing social assets, the result of social cooperation, formed by low-level human views.
In any case, capitalism, which systematized Western commercialism, is making the social integration function of politics powerless as it values the ‘life of ownership’. For example, it can be understood from the fact that transnational giants today often harm the stability of laws due to their tendency to favor them.
This is because ideological money, which compresses goods, plays an important role as a link between metaphysics and metaphysics like blood. It can be seen that owning such powerful money is serious, like class struggle.
Of course, just as we share natural resources such as air and water that make humans survive, it would be desirable to share money as much as possible as a means of exchange for human coexistence, a tool for happy life, and a social character so that it can be used for their ultimate purpose.
Therefore, considering that the civil revolution’s human rights declaration that established a modern civil society is more than humanity should realize, it can be seen that the mother democracy’s ‘ownership upper and lower limits’ based on a new maternal distribution style that substantially guarantees human dignity is appropriate.
3.2 Implementing an Active Welfare Society as an Economic Democracy
The establishment of modern society through the civil revolution, which took place by proclaiming freedom, equality, and fraternity, became a great legacy of mankind as a breakthrough progress. However, as absolute polarization was formed by capitalism, the meaning of the civil revolution’s declaration of human rights faded. This is because human rights without a material foundation are nothing more than political rhetoric without substance, like ‘steamed bread without antlers’.
In other words, democracy is anti-democracy in that it is a formal democracy as a procedural definition for liberalism. Therefore, it can be seen that the global era should be generalized as a complete democracy with procedural justice as a form and welfare through economic democratization, the content of democracy.
This is because in the era of the global village, which has been narrowed by the development of science and technology, the cultural conflict caused by the tradition of each region that continues to this day is the ultimate purpose of life and the identity that achieves social integration must be mitigated into a complete democracy.
In other words, it is essential to solidify democracy in order to become a new culture while exchanging various cultures, which are the lifestyles of each region. In other words, it means that new people must overcome cultural differences through economic democratization as they learned that their hasty and exclusive way of thinking to benefit from discrimination created a dangerous society as in the past.
New people living in the late knowledge and information era as the Third Industrial Revolution are creating numerous outcomes such as high-performance computers, information and communication, means of transportation, automation facilities, robots, life sciences, nanotechnology, and space development with the development of infrastructure by the Internet and endless application technologies, as well as mother democracy based on the maternal (democratic) distribution style.
In other words, the groundbreaking development of advanced science and technology and information and communication has enabled the absolutist philosopher Plato to realize his argument that the income ceiling should be less than five times the minimum wage for a peaceful world. In other words, the advanced science and technology in the global era has made the maternal distribution method, the ‘ownership top and bottom limit system’, feasible.
For example, the individual assets, which are the result of the realization of needs, divide the country’s total assets by the total population so that a family does not exceed five times the overall average, and the difference of more than five times, which is organized once every 10 years, is the source of allowances paid by the management committee to mothers who need income for family welfare. And it is a system that invests in solidarity with human challenges that require a lot of time and money, such as space development.
In addition, organizations, individuals, and cultural and artistic activities linked to social service activities to realize an active welfare society will be used as family welfare allowances or subsidies to mothers in crisis according to the committee’s decision.
One of the reasons why this distribution style should be globalized is that the self-regulation of resources by the independent way of survival in the region has lost meaning due to unilateral and radical free trade. In addition, it has become difficult for humans to solve the destruction of ecosystems caused by environmental pollution due to resource depletion or overfishing.
In other words, as the principle of neoliberalism, which is based on infinite competition, is advantageous for advanced countries with competitiveness, while the powerless underdeveloped countries are at a disadvantage, environmental pollution caused by indiscriminate resource development and collection to overcome it will harm all of humanity. Therefore, it can be seen that the UN, which has the vocation of historical development called shared growth as a global government, should take the lead in globalizing the maternal distribution style in order to redistribute the surplus value created through social cooperation.
For reference, the mother-in-law believed that the society of the new capitalism was immortalized like the law of energy immutability, and depending on the outcome of the act of life, it went home (the Big Dipper), reincarnated, or a few reversed dimensions to become animals, or even went to other stars.
In addition, most people reincarnate and modify the Earth several times, and when they reach a certain level, the criterion for “contribution. love” after being tested by a rookie was sharing (contribution. love), and it can be understood that there is no change in the direction of realizing an active welfare society. Therefore, it would be safe to see the demonstration of the “harmful welfare society” in the same sense as the realization of today’s active welfare society, in which sharing (love) is not suspected as a human mission.
Therefore, it can be expected that mankind will develop history as a ‘life of relationship’ if the surplus value created by the ‘ownership limit’ is used for the development of science and the realization of an active welfare society. As a bonus, humanity will be able to learn more clearly, just like the saints who have explored the inner world and understood who they are and where they came from.
In other words, it would be a problem that can be seen if today’s newcomers explore the universe, the source of life, the mind, and the soul with the infinite imagination and creativity of humans. In other words, it means that most people learn how to harmonize with all things in heaven and earth through the process of life and death, and at the same time discover ‘I’ who is immortalized forever in the process of exploring the universe.
Of course, it has been well known by extraordinary people since ancient times that the purpose of human birth linked to Daewooju is in the process of improving the degree of completion by supplementing the shortcomings. Therefore, it is understandable that it is a happy life to grow slowly into a ‘life of relationship’ for a ‘life of existence’ to increase the degree of completion of each person’s birth purpose, when we recall the fact that the society of the maternal new capitalism believed that humans were descended from Daewooju and progressed as descendants of the godmother.
Therefore, even if it is the result of individual efforts, it can be seen that the ‘ownership limit system’ to realize an active welfare society that guarantees the material basis by respecting human ‘natural ownership’ is a suitable distribution method for newcomers living in the global era to understand it as a result of social assets achieved through circular progress from time to time.
4. Guarantee of natural ownership
4.1 Welfare, the content of natural law
As a rational being, humans have a sense of history and give meaning to life with a culture of their own creation, and they are dignified beings as subjects who use tools to acquire goods and set the value of objects. For this reason, Protagoras, a Greek sophist around the 5th century B.C., defined humans as the measure of all things.
In addition, after establishing a modern society based on natural law ideology, humans progressed to an administrative state that passively guaranteed ‘natural ownership’, which can be said to be the content of ‘natural human rights’. Therefore, it can be confirmed that humans are spiritual beings as cultural beings who dominate and obey themselves by a self-created culture that is completely different from animals under the control of nature and pioneer their fate.
Today, however, neoliberalism causes absolute polarization to the point of giving up human rights, and ‘natural human rights’ remain in a declarative sense as a justification for free competition because the material foundation, which is the basis of human rights, is not actually guaranteed. As a result, it is clear that since human rights have been acquired by themselves as basic human rights, they must actively participate in politics in order to globalize a system that can protect human dignity.
Of course, political participation in the globalization of the maternal distribution style, which recognizes “natural rights,” the content of “natural rights,” will be the driving force behind creating a good world. This is because “natural rights” would be like an oasis without water without institutional support that guarantees “natural rights” that expanded natural law thought as a means to guarantee “natural rights.”
For example, it can be understood from the fact that democracy, the ideal of humanity, is in crisis as a capitalist society is only a “natural human right” (liberty, equality) for free competition and does not recognize “natural ownership” that guarantees the economic foundation as a practical content of natural human rights.
For reference, it is possible to understand the meaning of “Heavenly Ownership” in the traditional Korean proverb, which guarantees the material basis for human dignity as a descendant of God in the society of the mother-in-law, or “Everyone is born with something to eat.“
In other words, “natural ownership” has the same meaning as the right to live (right to live), which is the basic human right in today’s liberal democratic constitution, and is a basic right that guarantees a physical foundation separate from personality. Therefore, just as the natural world can coexist by forming a food chain, even if we do our best to acquire goods, we can see that the system that creates absolute poverty enough for others to fall into despair should be expelled with the beginning of the global era.
Of course, guaranteeing the material foundation is a right, so it has corresponding obligations, and it will not be possible to enable free rides even for those who neglect their obligations. In this sense, it is different from ‘natural human rights’ without obligations.
In any case, as capitalism institutionally fosters human greed, the polarization of wealth formed is causing more problems than the power polarization of the old era. In other words, the absolute polarization of 1 to 99 created by capitalism, which follows the characteristics of centralization as an absolute society that aims for polarization, is seen as the destruction of humanity.
This is the result of the desire for infinite possession as the father-in-law society became able to possess indefinitely through a monetary economy. For example, it can be understood from the fact that money has transformed into an information-based system that can accumulate more quickly and more beyond the gold standard era as a result of capitalism developing greed.
In this way, it can be seen that the tradition of capitalism, which justifies infinite ownership, and totalitarianism in the paternal society are the same. Of course, it contradicts the spirit of modern democracy based on decentralization. Therefore, it can be understood that democratic control for a ‘life of co-prosperity’ is necessary as the human being, the subject, belongs to the natural world and justifies the unrestricted jungle, which deviates from the limited jungle of the natural world.
In other words, just as different life forms are balanced by food chains in the case of the natural world, it means that humans as cultural beings should create a system and regulate themselves so that they can live a “win-win life.” For example, it should be regulated as a “ownership limit” to prevent overhunting only seafood that people prefer, reduction of agricultural land due to excessive breeding, resource depletion due to overconsumption, and collapse of the food chain due to ecosystem destruction due to environmental pollution.
It is dangerous for humans to break the balance between humans by affecting the natural world as well, since Mother Nature is made up of a harmonious structure made up of sunlight, air, water, and an organic food chain so that all living things can coexist. In other words, no one can restore the balance of the natural world’s weak and strong, which is limited by infinite competition, as humans can invent money to satisfy their infinite desire for possession.
Of course, the globalization of a limited distribution style is natural, considering that the laws of Mother Nature are limited in order to benefit the individual and the whole beyond the discrimination between good and bad. Therefore, it can be seen that in the era of the global village, a maternal distribution style that can live a ‘life of coexistence’ beyond the ‘life of opposition’ should be generalized.
4.2 Inheritance of social assets through social cooperation
It can be said that money dominated consciousness as it developed into a tool that can realize a monopoly attitude through the function of compressing goods. In other words, money that can realize greed became the subject and humans became objects. And the development of the monetary economy today has resulted in resource depletion and environmental pollution that destroys ecosystems due to excessive competition for ownership.
Of course, if neoliberalism allows humans to live as economic animals and leaves polarization unattended, if the crisis that will come to our planet due to the lack of solidarity between humans, we will not be able to escape the vicious cycle. For example, social costs caused by polarization, degradation of humanity, and environmental catastrophe caused by overconsumption are astronomical in the international money game due to the development of advanced information and communication.
Still, it can be understood from the fact that a dangerous society is solidifying, and large-scale natural disasters are increasing due to environmental pollution, resource depletion, and ecosystem destruction, but they are often left on the sidelines. In addition, as the issue of environmental pollution is a global problem that bears the cost of all of humanity, there has been a confrontation between the poor who became victims without income and the wealthy who gained income and became perpetrators.
In other words, unlike the pyramid structure between humans, once the pyramid structure of the ecosystem is destroyed, even though it is virtually impossible to recover by human power, and even when the survival environment has deteriorated due to excessive competition, poor people who have failed to compete will fight for the result of overfishing or natural damage to survive.
Of course, the destruction of ecosystems and environmental pollution are due to monetism. In other words, the monetism created by capitalism means that the result of making humans a small pear and living an ‘extreme life’ is environmental pollution that harms countless others. For reference, the standard of small pear in the East is that they eat it when close, resent it when far away, selfish without adultery and moderation, use other people’s weaknesses, or hide their greed by learning skills to make the other person collapse with retaliation in mind.
For example, it can be understood from the fact that the East, which emphasized harmony between win-win, was a society of private agriculture, industry, and industry achieved by social contribution. Therefore, capitalism, which allows humans, the subject, to live as ‘economic animals’, is a system that creates a dangerous society. Therefore, it can be understood that it is time for humans at the center of the relationship, who are in harmony in cooperation with heaven, earth, and everything, to live a ‘life of existence’ by globalizing the ‘upper and lower limits’ on their own.
Of course, scholars warn that if human beings, who are cultural beings, are at the top of the food chain and destroy the food chain of the ecosystem due to infinite competition among humans, humans may soon be annihilated. For example, if humans and other living things in nature as subjects are organic, even if they are objects, they can no longer be reproduced or if they cause shortages, money that reflects real value loses its meaning.
In addition, despite the fact that capitalism was created by the belief that it would be happy through the abundance of material, a dangerous society is solidifying as it rather commodifies humans and makes them like consumables. Of course, wise humans have long been preparing for post-capitalism, which balances spirit and material, when we recall that humans have progressed from time immemorial to this day to achieve a balance between mind and material.
This is because capitalism has developed rapidly into an astronomical economy in a very short period of time, but it has developed into a dangerous society beyond humanity’s ability due to polarization, environmental pollution, and global warming as a dysfunction, and recognized that it will regress to a more dangerous society in the future.
Some say that capitalism was created in Western society, where people were entrusted with the management of the earth to grow and thrive at the top of the food chain, and even those who did not believe in other creatures or monotheists.
Of course, there is an aspect that capitalism was created with a clear polarization of power as an absolute feudal society based on paternalism centered on the monotheism of the father. For reference, it can be seen that the monotheism of the father is omnipotent, expressed as authority and prestige, absolute existence, vertical, and creative, but contrary to the fact that the monotheistic mother considers service, dedication, sharing, mercy, horizontal, and human beings as descendants of the godmother.
In other words, in the society of the mother-in-law, humans are descendants of the mother-in-law and live a life of sharing as a subject with the middle god. For example, it can be understood from the fact that Buddhism emphasizes that anyone can become a Buddha if they keep the precepts, along with the primitive yin-yang theory that succeeded the society of the mother-in-law.
In other words, he emphasized leading by example because he thought that humans were the subject and autonomous entity of Samra, not a servant, but not a single ancestor of the father. Therefore, it can be seen that the East is fundamentally different from the West as a humanistic society based on humanism, which maintained the value system of private agriculture and industry in order to think and reflect on itself.
In other words, there is a fundamental difference in that the West did not have the concept of an ancestral deity according to belief as a creature created by the single father, while the East, which has a long tradition of humanism, offered thanks to its ancestors and worshiped their excellent ancestors as ancestors.
In other words, traditional Korea, which inherited the tradition of the maternal, put weight on the “life of existence” for a happy life as people are cyclical and progressive, while the West, which worshiped the single father god, put weight on the “life of possession” as it thinks that people live a one-off life as a creation.
For example, the East respected women who gave birth by thinking of humans as heaven, earth, and subjects of recognition, and the Western idea of creation can be understood in a fundamentally different fact from what was thought, as if the father were the only god and the woman were the owners, and like a robot-producing machine.
In other words, it can be seen that the East tabooed exploitation using the fear of death and starvation, which are human weaknesses, or the creation of a system to justify and cultivate greed, and humans thought of self-pulling “hand-pullers” as the ultimate purpose of life, suppressing the development of commerce that breaks through human bonds.
Due to the difficulty of accepting capitalism, the East not only delayed industrialization but also experienced considerable confusion. Unlike national capitalism, which was able to maintain their identity today, the East, which must receive neoliberalism, is struggling. In other words, state capitalism was acceptable in the case of the East as a passive welfare state, but unwelfare neoliberalism centered on developed countries conflicts with Eastern values.
For example, it can be understood from the fact that Asians were thinking the same as capitalist minds and small people. However, since human consciousness gradually changes over at least decades or hundreds of years, a third value suitable for the global society will one day be established as Western and Eastern values converge.
Of course, as advanced countries in Europe that connect traditional culture also suffer from social integration due to neoliberalism, each country is trying to balance it with neoliberalism while restoring their identity. This is because Adamsmith’s capitalism, which was created by the British Industrial Revolution, spread to Europe through the Civil Revolution.
However, despite the fact that today’s dangerous society has been formed by resource depletion, environmental pollution, polarization, and degradation of humanity due to astronomical consumption, social integration has become difficult as neoliberalism has deepened the nature of capitalism. Therefore, it can be seen that ‘postmodernism’ has emerged to overcome modern society that cannot solve the indifferent phenomenon and absolute polarization in which the whole is dangerous due to the enlargement of the private realm of monetaryism.
Of course, ‘postmodernism’ is different from ‘post-capitalism’. In other words, capitalism, which motivates human selfishness, refers to the globalization of a new maternal distribution style that allows humans to live as subjects by marginalizing them by making consumption an end, not a means of life. In other words, since humans cannot live with bread alone, they must be satisfied with a new distribution style.