Humans are dominated by a culture they have created for a happy life, wondering who they are, exploring things, and making progress to become good beings. This can be understood in that animals live a simple life of the weak and the strong, while humans live a complex of good and evil.
In addition, since humans are fundamentally good beings, we can understand that they are wise beings from the fact that they have set a survival style (culture. value) to suit their local environment to overcome the conflict of conscience and desire in the real world.
In addition, it can be understood that the mother-in-law society believed that humans were a descendant of God and circulated and advanced to practice good nature, and that evil was temporary and considered evil for good, or that it was in the soul and returned to human nature by sharing and honing it through difficulties in reality.
Therefore, regardless of whether the above facts are true or not, it can be seen that humans are good beings when considering the mental culture and material civilization that humans have achieved. For example, the fact that humanity has established a modern society, implemented a passive welfare state, and subsequently strives to realize an active welfare society that is the ideal of humanity can be understood.
Therefore, considering their hard work in creating a global era that humans have achieved by reinventing life with culture, it would be desirable to reward themselves with an active welfare society based on a maternal distribution style. Of course, as capitalism based on a “life of possession” develops, there are various negative signs such as global warming, ecosystem destruction, and absolute polarization, so there is also an aspect of living a “life of relationship.“
As a result of the accumulation of knowledge by wise humans, if capitalism jeopardizes humanity, it will be expelled. And the natural world is balanced by a limited, jungle-style food chain structure. On the other hand, humans who belong to the natural world as subjects and at the top of the food chain have a culture of recreating life with an excellent brain.
Additionally, humans are disproportionate due to infinite competition between the food chain in the natural world and other humans as they can use tools for a happy life with excellent bodies, overcome real difficulties through social cooperation, and stockpile surplus production according to their respective roles.
This justifies extreme polarization through the status system since the emergence of the paternal society, but it can also be understood in the way capitalist distribution, which caused absolute polarization of 1:99 in today’s modern society.
In other words, due to the extreme imbalance created by capitalism, absolute polarization has led to a situation in which it is impossible to coexist with each other or with other living things. This can be seen in the fact that today’s consumer movement to eliminate the side effects of overconsumption, the green life movement created by recognizing the importance of nature-friendly life, and the activities of various social organizations to improve the quality of life are trying to balance the natural world.
In other words, as humans have creativity, if they want to live a ‘life of possession’, like hyenas living for bread (a beast that eats leftovers and decomposed animals), they will be annihilated. Therefore, in the case of humans, no matter what they use for the ‘life of possession’, no matter what strategy, it can be seen that the capitalist system that forms the idea that the outcome is good even if barbarism or immoral acts under the guise of law are good is wrong.
This is because capitalism, which creates absolute polarization and puts humans in trouble, creates a vocal humanoid through confrontation and antagonism between humans. Of course, it can be understood from the fact that mankind lived in an unnatural system that solidified polarization, or from the historical experience of paying a harsh price for transfer in a modern capitalist society. Therefore, it is understandable that a political system for a new maternal distribution suitable for humans must be established.
As capitalism, which was created after the development of a paternal society based on the private system, led to excessive competition compared to a finite human life, there was a tendency to fall into the skepticism of “Why live a life?” This is because capitalism was thought to lead a happy life, but despite its short period of time, it has become a dangerous historical experience and a dangerous society today.
In other words, it is the result of human being commercialized and marginalized as capitalism cultivates desires. In other words, it means that humans have become consumables or means for production by becoming a physicalistic (monetary) society. This can be seen as a result of capitalism, which was established in response to the oppression of the old era, emphasizing human selfishness (individuality). For example, it can be understood from the fact that the majority of the people who were exploited in the corrupt old system were poor on average.
Of course, despite the establishment of a modern society based on the Declaration of Human Rights to overcome this, the majority of the people in the early capitalist society were poor due to exploitation. This can be understood from the fact that socialism based on planningism emerged as a result of the establishment of a modern spirit welfare society as a result of excessive exploitation.
This is because capitalism fundamentally justified the development of a society that stimulates and cultivates human selfishness. In other words, as the capitalist lifestyle sets selfishness as the first priority and sympathy as the second priority, moral responsibility is forgotten, even if it causes damage to the mass production of the poor due to infinite accumulation competition or to the majority due to environmental pollution.
In this way, in the case of humans, although a balance between selfishness and compassion must be achieved, individuality and sociality must be balanced, capitalism is a system in which human solidarity collapses by distorting the human characteristics of social (political) animals as individuality is prioritized. For example, “Why did Scumpeter predict the destruction of capitalism? The answer lies in sociology, not economics. In other words, it is not in analysis. Schumpeter sees the culture of capitalism as having the property of corroding values.” (114) (Haile Brunner, 121p)
In other words, it is a system that denies that humans with a religious mind are spiritual beings by nature. Of course, capitalism, a Western value, can be understood in the fact that humans, as creatures, degenerate into simple consumable beings like parts of industrial machinery. In other words, humans are commercialized by themselves rather than being the subject of life, and are marginalized by becoming objects as a means of making goods. For example, it can be understood from the fact that the father-in-law society remained in a finite hardware and thought of as a one-time consuming existence.
As a result, it can be seen that it is fundamentally different from the belief that I, as a human being in the new capitalist society, is a spiritual being who circulates and progresses as a descendant of God. As a result, it can be seen that humans are cultural beings who reinvent and regulate themselves, which are made up of three components, the culture formed by the social system, the software mind, and the hardware body. Of course, it can be understood that humans are cultural beings, given that they have the outstanding ability to lead happy lives through a culture that they have reinvented themselves.
Contrary to liberalism’s intention to realize a happy life through material abundance, as in the class struggle of the old social class, capitalism is competing excessively to build absolute polarization. In addition, like Reaganomics’ “supplier economy” based on the neoliberal ideology today, the polarization of 1:99 is rapidly solidifying due to productivity by cutting-edge science and technology and superior competitiveness by superior quality or price.
This is because capitalism is a system maintained by consumption, as if a motorcycle that falls when it stops has to run endlessly. Therefore, as the temptation for consumption and chronic dissatisfaction caused by public relations competition have been cultivated, the phenomenon of ‘poverty in abundance’ has made physicalism widespread for everyone, and the majority of people fall into poverty due to absolute polarization.
Therefore, unlike the inner world with infinite imagination, infinite accumulation is impossible in a finite reality (outer surface) world, but just as infinite accumulation is possible, it can be seen that allowed capitalism creates a dangerous society. In other words, everyone living in capitalism becomes a victim of good faith. For example, it can be understood from the fact that a person living a short life does not have the necessary room for humans while they cannot afford to reflect on who they are, where they come from, or prepare for an unknown long journey.
In fact, capitalism is maintained by the endless occurrence of unhappiness and the increasing number of traps. Therefore, it is understandable that in a matriarchal society where the technology to explore the inner world as a prototype society was developed, it was never a loss to humans to believe that humans were immortalized as descendants of God.
It can also be understood from the fact that in a capitalist society established to live a life of possession, classical music is an excellent music, but if left to market principles, it will decline and invest in classical music as a strategy for long-term balanced national development. In other words, the government invests classical music as a non-market indispensable public good as a way to achieve maximum profit and as investment is concentrated in jazz and popular songs that are in demand and profitable by market principles.
This is because humans as subjects are in a situation where they have to overcome the lack of substances through mental culture, recalling that the Earth’s material elements tend to accumulate wealth unconsciously.
For example, in Choi In-ho’s novel “Sangdo,” which depicts the life story of a colossus, Im Sang-ok in the mid-Joseon Dynasty, introduced as a drink cup that stays within seven parts no matter how much you pour, traditional Korean Gyeyeong-bae is a cup that can only fill seven parts, and it can be understood from the fact that he always refrained from desire and became the best object in the mid-Joseon Dynasty.
In other words, as a glass or teacup that teaches the wisdom of traditional Korean life, Gyeyeongbae was a traditional Korean holy grail that could not be filled more than 70% no matter how much alcohol was filled because there was a hole in it. Therefore, about two-thirds of the real world is the limit, and it can be understood as a symbol of the ancestors who recommended that one-third be left for a world that is unknown by the limit of reason. Of course, it is significant in that it presented practical and specific standards for moderation that inherent the spirit of philanthropy as Gyeyeongbae.
In other words, it was believed that it would be appropriate to accept 30% of the shortfall rather than to compete with each other to make up for the shortfall as human material desires are infinite, but they are essentially 30% lacking in the real world. In other words, they recognized social responsibility as subjects who had to coexist with others or other living things.
It is interesting to note that this way of thinking is consistent with the Korean people’s philosophy of Gyeyeongbae, as Dr. Hawking, a British astrophysicist, recently suggested that humans lack about 30% of the material needed to live since the creation of the universe, and that the universe is composed of seven dimensions. This may be the reason why the maternal society thought that humans were not perfect and that we should smooth the cyclical progression to the common system in order to balance matter and mind.
And even though Im Sang-ok, the object of Gye Young-bae’s meaning, was a merchant of the value system of the Four Agricultural and Industrial Awards, it can be understood that the traditional Korean phase system was determined by individual social contribution. Therefore, it can be understood that Gye Young-bae not only teaches the law of sharing unspokenly, but also was a symbol of self-awareness of greed, a human weakness.
It can be seen that this is consistent with the life of a ‘social model’, who is self-cleaning and showing examples to others. In other words, he thought it was human’s duty to live a tolerant but strict life to others. Therefore, it can be seen that the East regarded capitalism, which advanced from commercialism, as a low-level frivolous idea as he lived in the order of private industry, agriculture, and commerce.
This can be understood from the fact that in the case of the East, a society in which human sociality and individuality were balanced was considered a good society. In other words, the East, which emphasized harmony, thought that capitalism was extreme, making people frivolous and forming an unstable society. In addition, he would have thought that it was not necessary to create a system that fosters material desires through capitalism by eroding selfishness as a strong human instinct.
Of course, humans have been able to achieve humanistic achievements with endless intellectual desires, and if we recall that they have brought about qualitative changes, we will not need to cultivate greed. This lifestyle is a four-character idiom that is wary of harming others with self-interest, and can be understood in the word ‘over’ which means “too much is not enough.“
In this way, it can be seen that the East did not have a soil to accommodate Western capitalism. In other words, he despised capitalism, which was stingy to others, generous to himself, and extreme into an incompatible life. In other words, it can be seen that the distribution culture of the East, which viewed humans as subjects deserved social responsibility for coexistence, is in conflict with capitalism created in the distribution culture of the West.
For example, in traditional Korea, society was based on a clean life that could not be shared with others by considering society as a place to realize individual discipline and sharing as the best virtue, and as a nation dominated by scholars whose individuals and society were harmonized by moral standards, traditional Korea was a traditional country that rejected individualism as a Western value.
In particular, anyone who changed his status in the mid-Joseon Dynasty, despite being a merchant, can understand that it was an open society dominated by personality in the fact that it opened the way for government along with an increase in status. Therefore, it can be understood that traditional Korea contradicts the value system of ‘Sanonggongsang’ based on morality and capitalism.
Capitalist society based on free enterpriseism provided many jobs, but after the Second Industrial Revolution for the heavy and chemical industry, many companies suffered the Great Depression from the United States due to excessive competition due to factory automation.
In addition, the pace of polarization was steep and transformed into a high-cost, low-efficiency society as large capital sought to overcome the decline in asset value caused by inflation or performed financial speculation, hostile M&A (merger of enterprises), and employment reduction by any means to survive in an era of infinite competition. Of course, it would be the result of excessive competition for infinite accumulation, as a capitalist society systematically guarantees free competition for survival of the fittest.
Structurally, capitalists, workers, and consumers cannot escape from the capitalist sentiment that must be generous only to themselves. This is because capitalism overlooks the fact that human selfishness and compassion are unique beings that must live in a balance and lives by cultivating selfishness in a biased manner.
In other words, it is said that capitalism achieves a common good by material enrichment by human selfish motives, but in reality, it is a system that creates a dangerous society through extreme polarization of 1:99. This is because the common good is primarily strict to oneself and is predicated on generosity that can yield to others to some extent, so even though the majority must be balanced in the result, it appears as an extreme imbalance.
In addition, the harsh experiences of capitalism as it cultivated selfishness led to humans being imprinted as objects of the hostile food chain rather than peers. This can be seen as the cause of accelerating environmental pollution and human degradation by inducing excessive competition. In other words, the same is true of the results, even if capitalism is partially revised or partial reforms are made according to changes in the social environment.
Therefore, it can be seen that a system based on the maternal distribution style should be globalized rather than the risk of tinkering with the part that capitalism, which justifies a selfish life that is tolerant of itself, solves world problems. In other words, the capitalist distribution style should be expelled as the crisis facing humanity today can be seen as a result of capitalism. This is because people have become a dangerous society as their altruism, the source of sociality, has decreased while living in a capitalist society.
In other words, capitalism, which overlooks human characteristics that show more altruism than selfishness, is creating a crisis. This is based on scientists’ predictions that it can become an unsustainable society that leads to situations in which no one can take responsibility.
Therefore, it can be seen that it is a request of the times to establish a matriarchal democracy society for globalizing the maternal distribution style, just like the common system of maternal society, which thought that humans as microcosms progress in conjunction with macrocosm.
In any case, in today’s capitalist society, as humans are commercialized, commodities are the subject and humans are marginalized as objects. In other words, it means that humans living in capitalism are not the subject of life but are living as objects to satisfy their material desires. And in today’s global village era, polarization is formed between individuals, businesses, and countries, and at the same time, the world may be in danger due to increased interdependence.
In addition, unlike in the past, the swamp of the Depression has a deep and widening phenomenon, so there is a burden of living as an economic animal to survive the new paradigm of ‘economic war’, another meaning of infinite competition. In addition, the order of the natural ecosystem collapsed due to competitively ruthless slaughter and indiscriminate collection and mining only to escape from economic oppression, losing its ability to self-purify.
In addition, it is facing a crisis due to competition for new product development, new product development, environmental pollution caused by overconsumption, or ecosystem destruction caused by global warming. In addition, the world has not escaped a vicious cycle such as a decrease in food due to acid rain, an increase in medical expenses due to increased diseases caused by contaminated agricultural and livestock products, and a decrease in effective demand due to loss of labor.
For example, since the establishment of a capitalist society, the survival style by self-regulation that prevents overhunting in the community has lost meaning, and it can be understood from the fact that the damage caused by ecosystem destruction and resource depletion affects the whole as a result of competitive overhunting to avoid becoming poor.
As capitalism, which has lasted only about 200 years, has a large scale of catastrophe caused by imperialism, human resources, natural disasters, and ecosystem destruction, and anti-capitalist sentiment is spreading as it becomes a dangerous society. This is because it has been found that there are not enough goods on the planet where humans live, but there are also no special materials that help them live for hundreds of years, and the environment is not.
In other words, humanity has recognized that excessive competition can actually lead to annihilation. In addition, despite the fact that capitalism is based on relativism, the human devastation caused by justifying absolute polarization or commercializing humans is excessive. Of course, it can be understood from the 911 terrorist attacks in 2001, when the Third World declared the expulsion of capitalism as the axis of evil.
In other words, the Third World, which views the difference in capital and technology between developed and underdeveloped countries as a result of past exploitation, understands neoliberalism as new imperialism. Therefore, it is understandable that Muslims consider it their duty to break down capitalism in the Middle East, which suffered damage from the so-called Crusades to imperialism around the 7th century, the religious war between Mohammed and Christianity founded in the 6th century after receiving a revelation from an absolute god such as Christianity.
Therefore, it can be seen that in the global village era, a capitalist system based on paternal values cannot realize global integration. For example, the high unemployment caused by the absolute polarization of 1:99 formed by competition for capital accumulation and tens of thousands of suicides are larger than the scale of the war and are facing a crisis, such as making life difficult for women vulnerable to instability.
Therefore, it is understandable that it is desirable to implement a matriarchal democracy society that allows a happy life with a ‘life of relationship’, considering the fact that in the real world of human life, there is fundamentally a lack of material and everyone goes empty-handed while it is not perfect. Therefore, it can be seen that the mother-democratic system fits the global (global village) era, removing the paternal distribution style to realize an active welfare society based on it.
Most people want to have money as a means of exchange for goods and services as long as there is life and hope to become rich. This is because money is necessary from birth to death, and money can get what it wants or realize its ideals. In other words, money is more than a means for a happy life, which is the ultimate purpose of life.
In other words, although people are cultivating or honing their personality to have abundant humanity or morality, most people consider making money as the purpose of life, and only living a rich life as a happy life. Of course, there is a difference between capitalism and thinking (cultural) that realized a happy life as a shared system in the mother-in-law society and thought that it would be a happy life as a “life of possession”.
Therefore, it can be seen that social cooperation should be made so that most people can live a happy life as the “life of existence,” which humans have longed for since birth, can be distributed in a maternal manner in the era of the earth village.
It is astonishing that all living things are maintained and inherited by having an organic relationship with other living things such as inanimate objects and plants as an independent individual. In addition, all living things have the instinct to live forever and the instinct to live forever. It is noteworthy that humans are good beings who obey themselves by culture as a mode of survival formed by the local environment and experience.
Of course, we can see that humans are good beings as spiritual beings if we recall that the matriarchal society was a religious society as the prototype society of mankind, and that the religious spirit of humans does not change from birth to the present day. For example, the fact that the civilized world of today has been established by people who take death lightly with the will to realize the ultimate purpose of life can be understood by creative and superior humans.
However, traditional taboos for preventing conflicts and safety due to free instincts must be observed, and humans are misunderstood as vocal beings due to collective decisions such as political reasons, religious beliefs, and compulsory norms that are mobilized for war. In other words, the good side was weakened and the vocal side was cultivated due to the explosive conflict caused by the emergence of the paternal society.
For example, the fact that the paternal society that abused it justified life neglect and violence over thousands of years because people fear death with their life-support instinct and fear of hunger and violence can be understood. This can be understood in the fact that in a maternal neo-capitalist society that believed in the cycle of life progress, the ability to recreate motherhood was divinely regarded as humanity’s centripetal power, while women who have been raising children since the emergence of the paternal society were ignored as inferior beings.
In other words, motherhood is reinventing humans through conception and childbirth, and for a long time, the paternal society has ignored the practicality of acquiring basic human knowledge through breastfeeding, parenting, and home education. For example, in the case of motherhood, the period of protection and rearing of a child to lead a human life is the most difficult period physically and mentally, and even the fact that contact with the outside world is inevitably limited and passive can be understood from the fact that it has transformed into a weakness.
In other words, with the emergence of the paternal society, as the trend of neglect of life became widespread, humans became consumptive beings, giving birth and raising children themselves became a weakness. Therefore, it can be presumed that when the maternal society was in a differentiated state that integrated politics and religion as a shared society, it naturally believed that humans were descended from the Great godmother and valued human life, but with the emergence of the paternal society, the maternal family neglected life while taking charge of religion and politics.
Please refer to the religious section that describes how women’s status has changed from the Mago period, which was the society of the mother-in-law, to ancient Korea, and to the Silla of the Samhan period, which succeeded Gojoseon. For reference, the era of worshiping the only god of the mother-in-law as an absolute being 10,000 years ago is called the Mago period, and Mago is the nickname of the mother-in-law God.
Discrimination between men and women has become evident since the emergence of the paternal society and the status system based on paternalism has been solidified. For example, it can be understood from the fact that people could not be freed from the oppression of power in an old absolutist society where power and possession were proportional.
In other words, people are always poor due to heavy taxes or various quasi-tax burdens while being suppressed to the bone by exploitation, tyranny, corporal punishment, and intimidation by power, which are attributes of paternalism. And paternalism is understood in the polarization of power in which those in power possess everything.
Of course, capitalism, which was created in response to the tyranny of absolute power in the era of “gold unity,” is based on “separation of money,” but in reality, it can be seen as an extension of paternalism in that it is becoming an era of gold unity due to polarization. In other words, it means that the will of despotism to expand power in the old era and the desire of capitalists to accumulate capital are the same in that they aim for absolute polarization.
In other words, monotheism of the old era was replaced by monotheism in modern society. Therefore, it can be seen that capitalism, which justifies unlimited ownership, is similar to legal exploitation by capital, just as the old era exploited it with power. Therefore, it can be seen that even though a modern democratic society based on decentralization was established, it is contrary to modern civic spirit that capitalism induces wealth polarization, just like the power polarization of the old era.
In any case, the first industrial revolution led to a breakthrough in humanity, and the capitalist system that supported it developed into an astronomical economy today, and the economy became the goal, and politics transformed into a means. Therefore, if the maternal society in time was a religious society, and if the paternal society is a political society, it can be said that modern society has transformed into a capitalist society with an economy at the center.
In other words, a capitalist society was created by a combination of liberalism derived from commercialism and democracy based on sovereign residents. However, capitalism is characterized by a situation in which money makes money, which destabilizes the real economy as a property of developing into a money game, and the absolute polarization of 1:99 caused by materialism or monetism makes domestic politics powerless.
This is because, as capitalism is based on economic liberalism, democracy is only a procedural definition as a formal democracy for liberalism, so there is a limit to suppressing polarization. For example, it can be understood from the fact that the more faithful the nature of capitalism is, the more absolute the money becomes, and at the same time, the political imperative social integration function of democracy or the welfare function of the state is reduced.
This is due to the fundamental difference between democratic politics based on relativism and the mode of capitalist distribution that justifies absolute polarization. Therefore, it is understandable that a new system based on the maternal distribution style should be globalized as democracy aims for depolarization as an ideal of humanity.
In addition, the global village era must advance into an active welfare society in which ecologically democratic and welfare women play a role at the center of distribution. In other words, in order to overcome the dangerous society triggered by capitalism, women who have been the centripetal force of humanity from time immemorial to this day should be the welfare subjects. This is because the newcomers living in the global village era must live in politics so that they can develop into a society that is in line with natural legal ideas.
Of course, it is a reference that the maternal society shared mental or manual labor as a monolithic society with the same values. Therefore, just as motherhood was the center of the maternal society and the male and female classes were balanced, it is desirable for the ‘mother democracy’ system to be globalized as a complete democracy in order to balance maternal democracy and paternal liberalism in the global village era.
In any case, it is desirable to develop history by establishing a system for the happy life of women, half of humanity, in a capitalist society that values growth and efficiency, given that women’s welfare tendencies have led to inequality. This is due to the fact that it is in line with the idea of natural law, which declared the principle of gender equality. Therefore, it can be seen that in modern society based on natural law, the distribution pattern for achieving geometric equality that recognizes that men and women are fundamentally different must be globalized.
Geometric equality can be understood, for example, in the fact that maternal instinct has the right to distribute for the upbringing of gender and has guaranteed a material basis through a shared system. This is because real gender equality cannot be realized in a modern society that is considered equal arithmetically and quantitatively in the reality where paternalism is the mainstream.
Therefore, it can be seen that with the emergence of the paternal society, it is necessary to reevaluate maternal love, sincerity and patience, and the fact that femininity or humans have been recreated to make them present. In other words, the perspective should be changed to geometric equality that respects qualitative differences, considering that ecologically excellent welfare characteristics are a weakness and are subordinate to men, but domestic labor, care, and childbirth and rearing are undervalued.
However, it will not be easy to understand geometric equality, considering that Christianity, a single paternal religion, discriminated against gentle and beneficial women 10 to 1, believed in the pain of childbirth and re-creation as punishment, and as humans were reduced to creatures of the single paternal god, women who reinvent humans became sexual slaves or seedlings.
This may be due to the fact that nomads who lived in the Middle East, where Christianity emerged, were formed only for survival in harsh environments, unable to afford to explore the inner world. This can be seen as the reason why despite the establishment of a modern society based on humanism, the father-in-law is still the mainstream today, and it is difficult for the majority of women to achieve economic independence.
For example, while unpaid housework is not recognized as labor in liberalism, the majority of women who do wage work remain auxiliary labor, and today they are directly affected by polarization. This is because capitalism, created in the Western paternal society’s way of thinking, which has long marginalized and ignored women, is advantageous for men. As a result, it is clear that the majority of women do not acquire the money, the content of capitalism, which is actually unequal.
However, as a new turning point for women to participate in society, modern society, which is based on natural law ideology, was able to establish a system that was advantageous for itself. For example, after the establishment of a modern society based on the Declaration of Human Rights, women won the right to vote in the early 20th century, which can be understood from the fact that a welfare state suitable for ecologically welfare and democratic women was established. Therefore, it can be seen that capitalism is a prerequisite for the realization of an active welfare society based on a maternal distribution style.
In other words, despite the inconsistency between democratic politics and economic liberalism based on maternal values, capitalism combined with the advent of the global village era has ended. Of course, it can be understood through socialism created by reaction to overcome the contradictions of capitalism. In other words, capitalism, which contradicts democracy with maternalism, is a transitional system for maternal distribution.
Therefore, it can be understood that it is reasonable to develop history as an active welfare society when recalling the fact that non-claimed capitalism has progressed to modified capitalism that seeks to realize passive welfare. In other words, in order to realize the geometric equality required by being a human being, a new maternal distribution style must be generalized.
Modern society, which was established by the civil revolution at the end of the 18th century, established a capitalist system that combined democratic politics and economic liberalism. Of course, Adamsmith insisted on being restricted by rejecting large corporations that could neutralize market functions, and emphasized competition through the conscience and autonomy of capitalists. However, it differs from Adamsmith’s capitalism when considering the accumulation of large capital as a large corporate company or the fact that capitalists led state affairs by intervening too much in national policy in modern civil society.
Additionally, Adamsmith, who thought about a rich life through free competition and freed from the suppression of political power under the old system, presented the limitations and conditions of laissez-faire. However, it is clear that the capitalist not only overlooked this point, but also rejected even the moral interference of the traditional society and justified exploitation.
In other words, there was a significant difference in that Adam Smith’s laissez-faire was small and medium-sized and wanted to be faithful to the matriarchal values, the essence of democracy, as it was aimed at large corporations.
Of course, just as absolutism (totalitarianism) causes power polarization, Adamsmith’s laissez-faire, which knew that if capitalism allowed a major corporation, the polarization of wealth would make it an unstable society, was unsuccessful due to capitalists’ attacks. In other words, despite the fundamental differences between decentralized democracy for win-win and anarchic and centralized economic liberalism, capitalism, which was created by combining convenience, ran counter to decentralization, the spirit of modern society.
Therefore, it can be seen that Adamsmith’s assertion that the market is automatically adjusted by invisible hands is impossible in the paternal distribution style. This is because in a world where the paternal distribution style that allows unlimited ownership is common, one must immerse oneself in transfer tactics.
This is not a value-oriented society, but a society that places value by capitalism, and the nature of capitalism can be understood from the historical experience of falling into chaos (Chaosian situation) caused by value transfer.
In other words, it means that humans, who are rational beings, can enjoy a happy life when they want to live a ‘win-win life’ because they have compassion and philanthropy for humans as colleagues. For example, modern society was established and freed from oppression from the state, but as if meeting a tiger while avoiding a wolf, exploitation for capital accumulation between large corporations became common, and people’s lives were difficult in imperialism created by conflicts of interest.
In addition, SMEs and startups were unable to enter the market due to a lot of state interference and regulations, while large corporations managed with bureaucrats suffered a lot of losses as they accumulated capital in a direction consistent with national policy. In other words, the market order was distorted by overwhelming the market with large capital accumulated by collusion between politics and business, which accumulated the non-market part consumed by the state.
And in modern society, since capitalists became the mainstream, women or the people of the proletariat did not have the right to vote, and only citizens of the proletariat had the right to vote. Of course, even though the people were poor due to exploitation, as a result of transferring them to individual incompetence, they did not have the right to vote.
In this way, socialism created in response to the heartlessness of capitalism can be seen as the reason why they insisted that they were real democracy and emphasized the ups and downs of capitalism, calling liberal democracy half (formal) democracy.
In other words, he argued that capitalism distorted the welfare nature of democracy. In other words, it means that we must be faithful to welfare, the essence of democracy based on maternal values. Therefore, it can be seen that capitalist democracy is incomplete as a so-called paternal democracy. This is because in a liberal democratic system in which liberalism is the content and democracy is structured in a formal procedural definition, liberalism is the purpose, and democracy is the means.
In other words, it is a paternal democracy that must adhere to the principle of liberalism. Therefore, in order to solve humanity’s immediate problems caused by the value transfer of capitalism, democracy based on altruism should take precedence, and a “upper and lower limits” of maternal democracy should be established to realize economic democracy (economic democratization) in which liberalism based on selfishness makes concessions.
Of course, in a liberal democratic system, there must be a climate for the establishment of a new system, maternal democracy (mother democracy), as the ‘ownership upper and lower limits’ based on the maternal distribution style that guarantees ‘natural ownership’ are controversial.
On the one hand, it is a form that combines socialism and democracy, which claim to be real democracy only when practically economic equality is achieved, and it can be seen as a dichotomy in that capitalism as social democracy (socialism) and liberal democracy are both biased. In other words, capitalism, which is biased against human individuality, and socialism, which is biased against human sociality, are the same in that they are extreme.
Of course, recognizing this fact, today, ‘centrarianism’, which combines the two systems, is suggested as an alternative. In other words, capitalism, which has led to a serious situation due to polarization, refers to the convergence of a system that accepts part of socialism beyond modified capitalism to solve the problem.
However, as each system, such as centristism, socialism, and capitalism, is dichotomous together and is based on paternal values, there is a limit to half-democracy. Therefore, it can be seen that modern democracy must be consolidated into ‘mother democracy’, a complete democracy, in order to overcome the dangerous society formed by the lack of harmony between human individuality and sociality as a father democracy.
This is the result of humans’ desire for the ‘life of existence’ as an independent subject, and when we recall that democracy, which is the ideal of mankind based on maternal values, is established, a welfare society, which is the welfare essence of democracy, must be solidified. Therefore, it is understandable that it is desirable to live a ‘win-win life’ as a human colleague rather than justifying exploitation with capitalist logic.
In other words, a maternal democracy that can establish a maternal distribution style, the ‘ownership and lower limit system’, is appropriate. For example, the fact that sharing is mutually beneficial can be understood in the miracle of “five loaves of bread and two fishes” in the Bible’s Maga Gospel, where 5,000 people eat five rice cakes and two fish, but there are twelve baskets left.
In other words, people carried food around in society at the time, and after listening to Jesus’s mantra of mountain life, they realized that the ultimate purpose of life was to share (love) and practiced it as truth. Therefore, in order to rationalize greed, it is not true to interpret and commercialize human beings, cultural beings, or to systematically support the infinite greed that impoverishes the majority of people through polarization.
For example, in the case of maternal virtue, due to the polarization of wealth in capitalism, comfort slogans are no longer meaningless today for exploitation wrapped in social virtues, and not only are they not realistic, but most women do not feel pride or responsibility as they are poor.
Therefore, it can be understood that it is desirable to globalize an active welfare society that is substantially guaranteed by the state in order to realize it, as it emphasizes maternal care and childbirth and parenting as social virtues. Of course, the world is civilized enough to compensate for past mistakes caused by paternalism through system change, and it can be realized through advanced science and technology civilization along with the will to pursue a ‘life of existence’.
It will be difficult to overcome the crisis, as evidenced by the historical experience of paying a considerable price for war, terrorism, and riots, even though a world of social cooperation is for coexistence, when polarization is solidified in a paternal distribution style that induces the life of an adversary. For example, the Roman Empire can be understood from the fact that the sex culture caused by excessive paternal monopoly was corrupted and destroyed by corruption for pleasure, natural disasters, or diseases.
Capitalism has become a dangerous society as it is characterized by ‘poverty in abundance’ and induces polarization. As modified capitalism (passive welfare state), which allowed interventionism (protectionism) to improve the problem of capitalism, became the cause of trade friction, neoliberalism centered on advanced countries that globalized laissez-faire emerged.
However, even developed countries are increasingly negative about neoliberal ideas as the global economy declines. In other words, while neoliberalism, a Western value, can be matched in the same culture, anti-Western latecomers as a heterogeneous culture seek to realize social integration through the unique culture (identity) of each region that has been formed over thousands of years, leading to conflicts due to cultural differences between each other.
For example, Islam is a religion that is conducted by a person who has studied without a specific leader, and Islam as a life itself is a religion that divides one-40th of its income to terrorist groups or anyone who wants to give it, and Christianity has to donate ten trillion won and has a lot of funds and organizations.
This is because, even though the capitalist lifestyle expressed as Western values is common, late-stage capitalist countries seek to solve their problems by cultivating anti-Western sentiment due to poverty and confusion formed by wounds from the past. In other words, it can be seen as a willingness to overcome the poverty situation caused by the current chaos along with the harsh historical experience caused by capitalism amid inconsistency between Western values and their identity.
Recalling the rigors of imperialism established by capitalism after the Industrial Revolution, the former European colony considers it a demand development in advanced countries with strong productivity with cutting-edge science and technology. The 911 terrorist attack in the 21st century, which demonstrated a strong will to eradicate neoliberalism centered on developed countries, can be understood.
In any case, mankind, which established a modern society, experienced the development of natural law, liberalism, and empiricism, democratic politics, capitalism, and science and technology. And while the Third Industrial Revolution has reached the information society in today’s global era, concerns are deepening as it becomes a dangerous society due to environmental pollution, polarization, and degradation of humanity.
Therefore, as the consequences of the ‘life of possession’ were dark, mankind learned that the ‘life of relationship’ for the ‘life of existence’ was suitable for humans. In other words, humans recognized that they were microcosm humans from the fact that they achieved humanities achievements or advanced science and technology civilization along with brilliant civilization. In other words, through the high-tech science and technology civilization, in which humans achieved social cooperation, humans recognized that the ‘life of relationship’ was appropriate as a spiritual being.
Of course, if we live in the global era with neoliberalism, the pace of absolute polarization of 1 to 99 will progress faster, making it much more difficult than the old era of totalitarianism. This has already been experienced in imperialism, which rationalized even the immoral like a wolf in a sheep’s mask by continuously developing high-level exploitation methods from early capitalism created by the West during the era of imperfection.
This is because Western values are based on a dichotomous ‘life of conflict’ in the fact that it emerged as a huge weapon system, a Cold War system, environmental issues, and global polarization, including colonial, imperialism, and World War I. Therefore, it can be understood that liberalism, which emerged that a country without individuals is meaningless while denying the oppression of the old totalitarianism, is inconsistent with the global era that requires a ‘life of co-prosperity’.
In other words, liberalism (individualism), which interprets the world centering on human individuality, does not fit the global village era in which human sociality and harmony are important. In other words, in the global village era, an active welfare society must be realized to live a happy life. Of course, as capitalism with anarchic properties develops, it is necessary to overcome the unstable society formed by absolute polarization and the creation of a new form of transnational multilateralist society.
Finally, the maternal family separated religion and the paternal family into politics in the paternal society that succeeded the matriarchal society of unity of the church and state. However, women who were alienated from politics were unable to maintain the mainstream in religion since the establishment of the superior paternal religion due to the solidification of the paternal society. And after the establishment of a modern democratic civil society, about 100 years later, women died and obtained the right to vote in the early 20th century, making it possible to participate in politics.
In other words, with the establishment of the capitalist production style and modern civil society through the First Industrial Revolution, men made drastic changes, while women made modest changes. It can be said that this is like putting someone who is not ready for a boxing match. Therefore, it can be understood that a mother democracy system should be established in which women and men each have half the power and balance.
In other words, in a capitalist society, free enterprises pursuing private interests will have no tendency to influence shortsighted political decisions or power structures in their favor. In other words, it means that a dangerous society from capitalism can be overcome by the universalization of mother democracy, a new political and economic system based on the maternal distribution style.
This is because capitalism cannot solve this problem, despite knowing that polarization caused by capitalist distribution, which justifies unlimited accumulation, is the cause of numerous problems. Therefore, it is natural to realize an active welfare society by establishing motherhood, a system that guarantees women half of the political power.
Additionally, humanity in the age of the global community still has challenges to overcome dangerous environmental issues, global polarization, and cultural conflict. Of course, if we globalize the maternal distribution style, we will be able to overcome the fact that the maternal neo-capitalist society, which is based on maternal love that does not change due to human centripetal power, has created an archetypal culture for tens of thousands of years peacefully.
In other words, it refers to the globalization of the ‘upper and lower limits on ownership’ as a device that guarantees compensation and ‘natural ownership’ to women who have been marginalized by the advent of the paternal society. In other words, in the case of women, it means compensation for damages caused by extremely unfair institutions, ideas, practices, social emotions, and welfare instincts subordinated to the paternal family.
In other words, if a just society that lives up to this day has been the cause of poverty, it should not be repeated in the future through the implementation of an active welfare society with the ‘ownership upper and lower limits’, which is a maternal distribution style. Although it was a modern society that was established to realize human dignity, there is also an aspect that a maternal distribution style that guarantees the material foundation must be globalized to overcome the evils of human neglect caused by numerous wars, colonization, excessive polarization, and ecosystem destruction caused by imperialism.
This can be attributed to the recognition that newcomers living in the global village era cannot live as ‘economic animals’. Therefore, in the global village era, it can be seen that a maternal democratic society that enables a ‘life of relationship’ should be universalized.
After the establishment of a modern democratic society, women who had been thoroughly alienated from Western society were able to be formally liberated. In other words, the West, which is based on Christian culture, entered the Renaissance era due to the influence of East-West cultural exchange and trade expansion in the Middle Ages, making the belief in absolute existence uncertain, and empiricism developed as humanism.
In other words, women were liberated by the development of democracy and science based on philosophical relativism when the Industrial Revolution and the Civil Revolution took place. And the industrial revolution led to a large number of women participating in spinning factories as wage workers, and laissez-faire created at the same time contributed to the civil revolution, and the establishment of modern civil society later enabled women to be liberated.
However, despite the establishment of a modern society, women who were merely dominated by the unverified traditional values set by the patriarchal superior religion in Western society have long been marginalized, uneducated, and subordinated to men, and were able to win the right to vote by the beginning of the 20th century. In other words, women were unable to become economically independent due to difficulties in acquiring skills due to lack of basic education, and despite being in their own body, they could not do so at will by the social sentiment of the duty of chastity.
In addition, most women mainly assisted or worked in vain because they were unable to acquire the technology required by the industrial era due to internal tasks such as childbirth, domestic work, family welfare, breeding, and agricultural work. As a result, it can be seen that there were aspects that made it difficult for women to break the boundaries of the division of roles between men and women in a capitalist society.
For example, in the early capitalist society, ignorant women and adolescents were exploited to put families in crisis. Following this, women and adolescents are at a disadvantage as capitalism becomes a dangerous society due to absolute polarization created by the development of neoliberalism, and the family dissolution is increasing.
Therefore, it is understandable that a new system should be established that guarantees women half of the power in line with the ‘principle of equality between men and women’ in line with the ‘principle of equality between men and women’ as capitalism grows more unstable and ecologically welfare women are at a disadvantage. In other words, beyond capitalism, mother democracy, which is in line with ecologically welfare women, should become common and an active welfare society should be realized.
For example, in developed countries, welfare reduction has become a reality due to neoliberal policies, increasing the private sector’s dependence on donations from the wealthy, but donations from a small number of wealthy people cannot meet the welfare needs of the absolute majority of the poor caused by polarization.
This is because neoliberalism seeks to focus the state on efficiency or growth as a business management method. In other words, capitalist globalization, which has become a commercial world, cannot afford the explosive welfare demand caused by the absolute polarization caused by hostile mergers and acquisitions (M&A) by multinational conglomerates or activities of international speculative capital.
In other words, it has become a highly unemployed society in the Spring and Autumn Warring States era of interest groups that must compete indefinitely between interest groups and free companies, just as dinosaurs are fighting for food in today’s era when a number of dinosaur companies were created. Therefore, it can be expected that humans will find it difficult to adapt to the ultra-high-speed era caused by infinite competition, and that it will be difficult to overcome current problems such as resource depletion and environmental problems caused by overconsumption as long as capitalism continues.
Of course, it can be said that the need for a wide global market itself is a new crisis due to the decrease in demand due to polarization by country, company, industry, and individual. In other words, with the emergence of transnational large corporations today, global polarization is accelerating, just like a black hole, with the acceleration of free trade for market expansion.
For example, human overconsumption leads to resource depletion, forcing large corporate groups to compete indefinitely for survival of the fittest by forming, and the enlargement of international speculation funds and the erosion of the market by multinational corporations shrink the domestic industry and accelerate polarization, causing conflicts to explode. As a result, it can be seen that the national power is weakened by infinite competition for survival, and the problem is passed on to foreign countries, causing tension in the international community.
This is because most manufacturing industries shrink during mergers and acquisitions and the real economy shrinks due to reduced employment, but capitalists are bound to become dependent on foreign capital as assets grow exponentially and the polarization, which means the fall of the middle class, is formed.
3.2 The withdrawal of capitalism that has no benefit to the majority
In countries with certain natural resources, the decline in consumption caused by rising international prices of raw materials due to resource protectionism has led to the collapse of numerous companies that have lost competitiveness as the real economy shrinks, and at the same time, the unstable world has no benefit to anyone as financial speculation becomes active.
This is because multinational corporations in the past acted in combination with speculative capital as a way to secure and supply raw materials at low prices, and in the case of war, the loser pays war compensation or the winner bears historical responsibility as the people bear enormous war costs.This is because multinational corporations in the past acted in combination with speculative capital as a way to secure and supply raw materials at low prices, and in the case of war, the loser pays war compensation or the winner bears historical responsibility as the people bear enormous war costs.
In other words, it was thought that raw materials would coexist if they applied the market principle and paid the right price in respect of the value of the resource, generating effective demand in resource-rich poor countries, and sharing profits. However, multinational corporations sought to increase their market share through the pursuit of latecomers, but as they caused conflicts without real profits, they attempted to solve the problem through a supply economy based on advanced science and technology and intellectual property rights that required enormous capital and considerable time.
This can be seen as the reason for the creation of neoliberalism, which is based on the division of labor in the world. However, it is concerned that neoliberalism has a role in destroying nature protectionism, and that countries without technology or resources may be subject to international financial speculation, which is possible due to the development of information and communication technology, as well as a decrease in employment.
In particular, although the regions under colonial rule are generally resource-rich countries, there are many loans received from advanced countries for industrialization, and there is a tendency to protect themselves because they are victimized by low-level technology. In addition, in the case of a country that has long been colonized in the international community where cultural differences exist, there is a suspicion that ‘it would be a watermelon if you draw a line in a pumpkin’.
In other words, underdeveloped countries suspect that large corporations in developed countries play a role instead of the state thanks to national brands and science and technology. In other words, it means that neoliberalism is suspected of being neoliberalism, as free enterprises take the lead through nationalization, and the state recalls the colonial era behind it. Therefore, it can be seen that underdeveloped countries, which think that they have made good fortune from the other’s misfortune and have continued to this day, think of neoliberalism centered on developed countries as a man with two faces.
In addition, as capitalism develops, neoliberalism based on global division of labor cannot solve the phenomenon caused by deepening resource depletion, and it is concerned that rapid polarization will put the real economy in crisis and slow the global economy.
In addition, even if the international community turns into a dangerous 泥 of survival of the fittest due to infinite competition between transnational giants in a neoliberal world, it will be the people’s responsibility, not the responsibility of free enterprises.
Therefore, as capitalism, which allows people to live a “life of possession,” faces a global crisis as a result of encouraging overconsumption without thinking of finite resources, it is necessary to implement an active welfare society that can live a “life of relationships” in the form of distribution of mother democracy for a sustainable life.
Of course, capitalism has proven that it is impossible to live a happy life, the ultimate goal of human life. For example, the fact that the green environmental movement emerged as a life movement in the era of the global community, a stage in which a political culture dominated by women on the premise of peace and sustainable life is formed.
Therefore, it can be seen that mother democracy, which guarantees half of the power of ecologically democratic and welfare women, is appropriate to implement an active welfare society based on maternal distribution beyond capitalism based on paternal distribution for a happy life.
As cultural beings, it can be said that humans do their duty when social cooperation is conducted so that everyone can live like humans between them according to the ultimate purpose of life. This is because humans are creative beings who pioneer their lives by themselves with rich imagination, and the results of social cooperation are accumulated and live in the present. In other words, it means that as a rational being, a dreamy human being is a being who lives in social cooperation.
However, the humanities are losing their meaning as a result of social cooperation to foster the good heart of humans as capitalism overly emphasizes the selfish side of humans. In other words, capitalism destroys the bonds formed by the good side of humans, leading a life of solitude and being generous to oneself and stingy to others.
In other words, as monetarism created by capitalism becomes more common and develops into a relationship by money between humans, the bond as a human colleague is actually disappearing. Therefore, it can be understood that humanity, who must live in a global era that requires human bonding, should universalize the maternal distribution style. In other words, the form of distribution suitable for today’s new generation living in the high-tech era should be established as a parent democracy that globalizes the maternal distribution style, not neoliberalism that strengthens the ‘life of possession’.
In other words, if a child has grown up and become an adult. Just as it is appropriate to wear adult clothing, the new class living in the high-tech era means that maternal democracy should be globalized as a new system for economic democratization rather than modifying capitalism. Of course, there may be difficulties due to the tendency to fear change because humans can learn the customs and tricks that have become common and stabilize in their own way, but this is possible when we recall that the civilization era has begun with the human tenacity to live like a human being.
Furthermore, a system for economic democratization should be established as it is reasonable to develop history as an active welfare society, just as it progresses from an unwell-being early capitalism to a modified passive welfare state. Humanity that has already experienced passive welfare will not tolerate regression if it forgets the historical experience of living an unfortunate life due to capitalism and insists on neoliberalism aimed at reducing welfare.
This may be effective right now if the number of technology-intensive or high-productivity automation companies increases, and welfare costs are reduced by corporate logic to strengthen the competitiveness of companies, but the world leads to a real economy crisis caused by high unemployment and reduced income. Of course, like the killing a cow while trying to pull out a bullhorn, the expansion of the poor will lead to an unfortunate life in emerging and middle-income countries.
This is due to the fact that free enterprises lose the ability to spend in a high-employment society created by the exit of numerous companies, increase disposable income by saving for future life, or avoid investment in an opaque economy, causing panic.
In other words, the social underprivileged gave up their lives when the vast majority of the polarization formed by capitalist competition fell into poverty and the market function was paralyzed by a rapid slowdown in consumption due to a decrease in income.
For example, not only does capitalism cause panic, but it can also be understood from the fact that women and non-regular workers, who are socially disadvantaged, are paying for the losses caused by competition, and that environmental pollution caused by overconsumption today directly or indirectly damages most of the poor.
In addition, demand for welfare is exploding due to the polarization formed by capitalism, which justifies unlimited ownership, creating a hegemonic giant company that evicts numerous companies. It can be seen that the welfare of the poor created by this is inhumane in that it shifts responsibility to individuals. Therefore, it can be seen that in the era of the global village, the ‘upper and lower limits’ of the parent democracy should be universalized in order to realize an active welfare society as an ideal of mankind.
Although neoliberalism, created by the emergence of transnational giants, accelerates polarization and explosively increases welfare demand, underdeveloped countries with poor welfare and advanced countries that aimed for a welfare state are all confused.
In addition, it can be understood from the fact that the poor are increasing due to a new type of panic as a result of raising raw material prices to resolve distrust in advanced countries by social integration and poverty and conflict.
In other words, underdeveloped countries with abundant resources tend to adhere to raw material protectionist policies, which have resulted in sluggish consumption due to inflation caused by rising international raw material prices. This is the result of resource-poor countries entering a serious situation, and resource-rich countries falling into a vicious cycle of risking falling raw material prices. In other words, neoliberalism, which demands infinite competition between transnational giants, is like bursting a shrimp back in a whale fight.
In other words, it means that small and medium-sized enterprises were brought down to become a highly unemployed society, and at the same time, due to sluggish consumption, polarization became clear. For example, in the case of financial asset holders and large capitalists, due to the global panic, they bought government bonds or stocks at bargain prices, and their assets increased exponentially due to hostile mergers with competitors.
It can be understood from the fact that it has often grown into a global company by purchasing its stocks and strengthening its management rights or easily donating it. As a result of rejecting interventionism by the bureaucracy in principle, neoliberalism as a global capitalism that deviated from state capitalism based on modified capitalism.
However, it seems good to hear that transnational multinational corporations want to freely engage in business activities (free enterpriseism), but they must live in a dangerous society formed by living as economic animals. This is because the capitalist development strategy motivated by greed has become a dangerous society that explodes conflicts by causing resource depletion and environmental problems, rather than having many problems in the early capitalist society, which was a small economy.
In other words, neoliberalism, which believes that multinational corporations with excellent science and technology and huge capital accumulation will be able to supply economies like early capitalism, is creating a new crisis. For example, as neoliberalism, which seeks to be faithful to capitalist attributes, is becoming more common, the number of people living in desperation is increasing rapidly, and it can be understood from the fact that after the Cold War, the Third World did not forget its harsh historical experiences and held grudges represented by the 9/11 terrorist attacks, which symbolized the expulsion of capitalism in 2001.
This is a representative example of the so-called ‘cultural conflict’, because it can be seen that Christianity and Islam worship the same absolute monotheism, but are caused by looting through medieval crusades caused by completely different cultures. This is probably because Christianity and Islam, as the sole paternal religion that emerged in the Middle East, were developed based on the exclusive and aggressive culture formed in the harsh environment of desert nomads.
For instance, the two oil shocks of the 1970s, when Islamic nations in the Middle East, a resource-rich Middle East, started out in solidarity with one another to protect resources. Neoliberalism developed this situation. However, justifying anti-capitalist terrorism based on religious beliefs as if it were to achieve the public good is inconsistent with the global zeitgeist.
Therefore, it is understandable that a new system based on a maternal distribution style for a harmonious life that deviates from the absolutist distribution style of the paternalistic neo-capitalist society must be established. It is understandable that humans today must progress to a maternal distribution style as the ‘life of existence’ becomes possible, as they have been civilized and wiser on average. Therefore, it would be meaningful to interpret the West through the East based on humanism.
In the society of the maternal new capitalism, which was one world before the separation of the East and the West, it was understood as a real world that was combined with the outer world, which was constrained by time and space due to mass, and the inner world, which transcends time and space as the source of reality. In other words, I believed that the eternal “I” was originally present, but returned to the world of masslessness and circulated to the world of masslessness, anywhere, of any kind, and into the world of flesh and milk.
In other words, the existing dance refers to the world of the soul as the main home set by humans. Assuming that UFOs (unidentified flying objects) also appeared in the mother-in-law society tens of thousands of years ago, it can be assumed that the mother-in-law society understood the ‘conviction of misunderstanding’ that the mother-in-law society returns to its human home through this phenomenon. Of course, in the case of humans with ecologically religious minds, they would have understood it by inspiration.
For example, it can be understood from the fact that ancient Eastern alter ego techniques, similar to natural phenomena in which invisible water vapor gathers to form clouds, rain or snow, and scatter, can be freely decomposed and collected in other dimensions.
Of course, as can be understood from women’s body types, the mother society must have known the “existence of nothing” as an inspiration, considering that Jwaseon was developed as a technology for inner exploration. Of course, the mother society explored the inner world to understand the nature of things, and then the father society would have been able to solve the natural laws with mathematics.
This is based on the fact that the maternal neo-bonist society is a monolithic society that does not separate spirituality. Please refer to the religion section. And the Eastern paternal society that succeeded the maternal neo-bonist society was a yin-yangist humanistic society, balanced to some extent with the maternal family, and had a harmonious relationship with the paternal family.
In other words, it was a humanistic society that was wary of conclusive things by acknowledging the limitations of human reason and leaving room for the inability to understand the world of extracurricular agnosticity. For example, it is true that the absolute monarch of democratic was to realize the people’s will as heaven’s will and not lose a sense of loss as a human being through fair distribution.
Additionally, the feng shui geography of the five elements of the Yin and Yang created all three-dimensional thinking Korean people, which is characterized by a relatively modest aspect in harmony with nature. Additionally, it can be understood from the fact that in the case of traditional Korea, despite the development of building technology and construction technology, there are few colorful palaces or large stone structures that make the heavenly people suffer.
In addition, oriental familism, which puts the legitimacy of the existence of a state on the basis of humanism and can be understood from the fact that it is based on humanism. Of course, the question of unknowing can be understood from the fact that the life of the ‘hand-made man’ based on the ‘life of existence’ is considered to be the responsibility of the individual who is the subject of life.
In this way, humans are considered to be creatures created by the monotheistic father, and the legitimacy of the existence of the state is in the will of creativity, and there is a difference from the Eastern civilism that there is a king because there are people. Of course, both the East and the West are very similar in terms of a paternal society, but the West ignored the motherhood that recreates humans as a creature by the monotheistic father.
In other words, it was a 10-1 society where the father was the subject and women were extremely unequal as objects, whereas the East was a democratic society with an equality index of about 6~4 as a democratic society. For reference, it contrasts with the fact that in the middle of the Joseon Dynasty, the status of women fell sharply in the middle of the early capitalism and the Confucian value of Namjon Yeobi, and the opportunity for social participation was fundamentally blocked.
In other words, it has been reduced to a subordinate position since the middle of the Joseon Dynasty, as opposed to the emphasis on gender harmony through role division in ancient Korean yin and yang ideology. And unlike the West, where women entered society due to industrialization, it was a small economy based on agriculture, so it can be said that the Western ruling party movement was an unimaginable environment while living a hard life mainly through housework such as farming and sewing.
Of course, the status of motherhood, which plays a different role from that of fatherhood, was respected in Korea’s traditional large family system, where the tradition of motherhood by the Korean people continued emotionally. However, it can be said that the actual status of women fell to the ground from the Imjin War and the Japanese colonial era. (Please refer to the status of Korean women on the side of religion.)
In any case, it can be understood that three-dimensional thinking in the East, which seeks to explore the inner side, which is the root of human beings, and analytical thinking in the West, which seeks to understand the inner side through the outer side, should complement each other. This is because, although early capitalism predicted that it would become a diamond-type society with a large middle class, it has become a dangerous society due to global polarization created by mass consumption today.
Of course, if there are infinite resources, it wouldn’t matter that capitalist human beings are mass-produced. In particular, it can be said that excessive competition to promote consumption undermines human-specific sense of justice to protect the public good and the public good arising from human’s good nature.
This is because capitalism is causing the degradation of humanity by commercializing humans and marginalizing them. In other words, it means that capitalism overlooks the fact that human beings, who are naturally cultural beings, are the subjects of pioneering Daewooism by recreating life through artistic creation, humanistic reflection, pure science inquiry, or sports with abundant imagination.
Of course, in order to compensate for the negative aspects of capitalism, the government intends to improve the quality of life by investing a little in art and sports, pure science, basic science, literature, etc., which are far from box office, or classical music or profit. This is because the artistic and physical ability expressed in human religious minds since time immemorial gives emotional stability and ultimate meaning to life.
For example, it can be understood from the fact that the matriarch society, which had a small number of vocabulary, maintained peace by communicating with God and humans through art such as theater, dance, and art, teaching the process of circular progress of microcosm humans linked to Daewooju, or forming a sense of solidarity between humans.
As a result, it is understandable that high-quality art must be developed to make people realize that they are spiritual beings as cultural beings who reinvent their lives for a happy life. As a result of capitalism’s cultivation of greed, it is clear that parental democracy as a post-capitalism should be universalized as it appears as hatred, humanity degradation, resource exhaustion, and environmental pollution.
4. Expansion of Natural Law for the Global Era
Capitalism is positive in that it overthrew the absolute feudal kingdom, established a modern society, and drove the development of science and technology, which was thought to exist forever in Western society. However, capitalism created imperialism and inflicted suffering on humanity. In addition, we are now faced with resource exhaustion and environmental problems due to the astronomical economic scale, incomparable to the time of early capitalism.
Additionally, it has become a dangerous society due to skepticism about life and the devastation of humanity due to the polarization caused by the accumulation of huge capital. This can be understood by the fact that since each field has become specialized today, communication has not been smooth, and conflict has exploded due to the polarization accelerating to infinite competition. This is the result of the absolute polarization of 1:99 formed by the enormous economic scale that humanity has achieved in a short period of time.
In other words, as capitalism became more solidified, the capitalist human form was cultivated and mainstream, the power of unresponsible money became absolute. And the irresponsible nature of non-relatedness, which goes anywhere in the world for maximum profit, is prevalent today, while the king is irresponsible for the negative consequences of infinite capital accumulation, just like he was an unresponsible and reigning king.
In other words, it is fundamentally due to the nature of the connectionless nature of moving to a safe place and trying to maintain capital transplantation or asset value. Of course, global capitalism is possible because the United States, the mecca of capitalism, plays a role like the World Bank that protects the world’s wealth, and giant capital is based on the political power of great powers.
In addition, advanced countries that have accumulated large capital need neoliberalism by making M&A through overseas investment, international financial speculation, or monopolizing advanced science and technology that requires considerable time and large-scale investment.
However, as the emergence of transnational giant corporations changes from the era of national capitalism to the era of global capitalism based on infinite competition, the domestic market function is paralyzed or the damage caused by state bankruptcy is passed on to the people. Of course, as global capitalism is incapacitating domestic politics, social integration is becoming more difficult due to the logic of corporate social responsibility and return of wealth to society.
This is due to the fact that capitalism, even if it is the capital, is in principle not responsible for the community. As a result of refusing to polarize the power of feudalism, we can see that humanity must open a new era of maternal distribution that takes a leap forward from capitalism that has created absolute polarization today.
Adam Smith’s capitalism thought that as humans are rational beings, greed and conscience would be in harmony and that the market would become automatic coordination. In other words, he thought that free competition motivated by selfishness in laissez-faire would ultimately achieve the common good.
Of course, in a small economy of the same culture at the time, free competition could be coordinated by market principles, but it would not have been possible to predict that automatic tuning would be impossible as human greed doubled as the scope expanded and scale increased. This is the result of development differently from the intentions of great scientists like Newton, extraordinary philosophers like Locke, and great inventors like Stephens, or Adam Smith, the founder of capitalist economics.
In other words, it was impossible to see how dangerous it is to justify unlimited possession in the historical fact that the conflict to accumulate large capital by creating imperialism and justifying racism based on the survival of the evolutionary fittest to justify exploitation. In other words, liberalism, which seeks to liberate humans by achieving material abundance, has created a rather dangerous society.
Of course, as a positive aspect of capitalism, we created an era of global village, consisting of the development of means of transportation such as automobiles and airplanes, and the development of computers and information and communication. And it is positive that every aspect has made significant progress, and that humanity has been enriched by the development of automatic machines to reduce labor and improve productivity.
However, environmental problems caused by urban concentration and industrialization of the population, resource depletion due to overconsumption, inflation due to luxury and excessive competition, loss of motivation for life, and degradation of humanity are making many people unhappy due to the dark future caused by explosive conflicts and polarization due to interests. In addition, it can be seen that capitalism is harmful to humans in that it created neoliberalism as a system to avoid the explosive increase in welfare demand and the limitation of social cost burden caused by conflict.
In addition, free enterprises maximize profits while avoiding social regulations on employment through division of labor, scaling, early replacement of workers, competition promotion systems, and non-regular workers, and investing in high-tech industries that require the expansion of factory automation facilities or higher education with accumulated capital is solidifying into a high-employment society while growing without employment.
In addition, in today’s neoliberal world, the number of failures is rapidly increasing due to the infinite competition of winner-take-all, and the competition between the world’s strongest hegemonic powers has had a significant impact on the domestic market, leading to the paralysis of market functions. Additionally, with the mass production of the socially underprivileged, the underprivileged became prevalent, and an unstable society was formed due to explosive conflicts between classes.
Additionally, professional women are avoiding marriage or missing their marriage years due to youth unemployment, which leads to a new issue of declining fertility rates. This phenomenon can be seen as a result of the capitalist development into capitalism as capitalists rejected capitalists, although capitalism, founded by Adamsmith, was limited to the size of individuals, wary of corporations that could expand indefinitely.
Capitalism, which was created based on the temperament of the relativistic (democratic) British people, has inherent ownership restrictions that presuppose human moral responsibility, but it has not been able to escape from the climate of absolutism that has long dominated consciousness. Therefore, it can be seen that today’s competition as a multinational corporation with global capitalism is contrary to the will of Adam Smith, who emphasized that it should be limited to small-scale transactions of small corporations or individuals.
Therefore, it can be understood that while Adamsmith’s capitalism can alleviate conflicts due to various cultural and racial characteristics with a transaction of moderate size, cultural conflicts are inevitable as neoliberalism created for large economies leads to living as ‘economic animals’. For example, it can be understood from historical facts in which racism and cultural conflicts exploded due to the formation of imperialism as a result of excessive development of corporate enterprises in the past.
Additionally, Adam Smith’s small-scale laissez-faire based on individuals can take responsibility for family welfare as it naturally has limitations in ownership, but despite the difficulty of taking responsibility for family welfare on its own in neoliberalism, which requires infinite competition between free business groups, it is a problem.
Therefore, it can be understood that sticking to neoliberalism, which produces the absolute poor with an absolute polarization of 1:99, is contrary to historical development, considering the motivation for humans to liberate from hunger and disease as a cultural entity or the fact that they achieved great civilization as a result of compassion.
Therefore, it can be understood that human life is sustainable only when business corporations as interest groups are generalized, and in a modern capitalist society developed into multilateralism, the ‘ownership top and bottom limits’ are established in parallel with free enterpriseism.
In other words, problems such as resource depletion, environmental pollution, and polarization must be overcome while acknowledging that there is a difference in ability as a result of a combination of social environment, mindset, content of experience, taste and effort, ultimate purpose of life, and individuality.
Of course, if mankind declared human dignity on its own, imprinted humans as microcosms by extraordinary people (new people), developed science and technology to live a convenient life, solve questions, or create capitalism to live a happy and enjoyable life, it should have the courage to be expelled.
In other words, it is not wise to insist on a system that ruthlessly transforms the majority of people with such great minds or consciences that humans can never live only in business. Therefore, it can be seen that the mother democracy’s ‘upper and lower limits’ should be established and developed into a society in which the automatic control function of the market works in harmony.
In other words, it means that the market can become automatic coordination only when the global society sets the limits of ownership like the maternal common system. Of course, geometric equality can be realized only when the maternal distribution method in which conscience and morality come to life is universalized.
Although the social status of motherhood that recreates humans in modern society based on natural law ideology must be at the level of fatherhood, gender discrimination remains today, and the majority of women are directly affected by polarization. In other words, despite the constitution guaranteeing that all men, women, men, and women of all ages are equal, it is actually unequal. This can be understood in that welfare women are at a disadvantage in capitalism based on paternal values.
This can be understood in that as capitalism, which follows one-off life, monopolistic, vertical, centralized, and exclusive tendencies, growth potential, centrifugal force, and absolutism, the attributes of maternalism, soul immortality, cyclical progress (rebirth, regeneration), decentralized, horizontal, active welfare, centripetal, relativism, subjects of all things, descendants of God, environmentally friendly, practice of sharing, peace, femininity, and existence are becoming non-mainstream.
As such, it can be understood that non-mainstream women are at a disadvantage because free competition based on formal equality, which does not recognize qualitative differences in modern society, presupposes consequential inequality. Of course, capitalism combined with paternal liberalism and maternal democracy is formal democracy.
In other words, despite democracy being the ideal of mankind, the crisis caused by anti-democracy, which fails to achieve economic democratization as a procedural definition for liberalism, is unfavorable to women. Therefore, it can be seen that the consolidation of democracy required by the global era begins with the realization of a distribution style based on maternal values. In other words, it means that maternal democracy must be established to realize the maternal distribution style.
This is because, for a long time, women have been marginalized in Western society, and the fact that welfare women are at a disadvantage due to the cultivation of capitalism’s selfishness is inconsistent with the global era, and capitalism is contrary to the decentralized nature of democracy. Of course, women suffered extreme gender discrimination due to Christianity’s original guilt, but the establishment of modern society allowed them to compete freely with gender equality, albeit formally.
Furthermore, it is a fact that a new political system in which the father and mother have formed their respective axes has been established in order for men and women of different characteristics to harmonize and develop in balance. In other words, an active welfare society with a guaranteed material basis can be established to realize qualitative equality that guarantees diversity by life’s ultimate goals, hobbies, and abilities, just like a mother-in-law society that has maintained complementary relationships that help with different properties.
For reference, in Eastern familism based on Eastern yin-yang philosophy, the couple is not a subordinate relationship, but a “couple-like body”, and two different properties are balanced by the nature, not by individual men and women.
And Eastern yin-yang familism thought of the family as a source (power plant) that created a third energy (love) to balance and harmonize yin and yang with different characteristics, and as a basic organization of society, created a blessed society.
In other words, the justification for the existence of the state is placed on the so-called ‘everything in harmony’. For example, it can be understood from the fact that motherhood is expressed as the family sun, the hostess, and the fatherhood as the hostess. Therefore, as we understand humans more with cutting-edge science and technology today, if we refer to oriental familism, the realization of an active welfare society, which is the ideal of mankind, will be globalized.
The modified capitalism, which was established at the time of laissez-faire, caused frequent panic due to the nature of free enterprises ignoring market functions and monopolizing them, interferes to maintain market functions through antitrust laws. However, it is true that free enterprises often use money to gain an advantage for expediency or law revision to survive.
Additionally, as free enterpriseism aims to maximize profits, the tax burden is significantly increasing due to the explosive increase in social costs caused by environmental pollution or human degradation. Additionally, when large corporations that are faithful to capitalism are on the verge of bankruptcy, they frequently request government intervention under the pretext of the national economy, and there are numerous instances of endless self-excuses and rationalizations that deserve moral criticism.
Therefore, it is natural that ownership differs according to individual abilities and tastes, but today’s large-scale economy is facing a crisis in terms of the right to live due to pollution, resource depletion, and polarization, indicating that ownership must be restricted. In other words, the liberal distribution style that justifies unlimited ownership, which was suitable for a small economy, is inconsistent in the global era living in a large economy.
For example, when a child grows up and becomes an adult, even though he or she has to wear adult clothes, he or she is not prepared. In other words, civilized new people distrust and fear capitalism that suppresses humans through absolute polarization. Of course, social democracy, which warned of the dangers of capitalism, emerged, calling liberal democracy formal democracy, and saying that they were real democracy that actually guaranteed economic equality.
However, it can be said that the combination of socialism and democracy is fundamentally inappropriate as socialism, which focuses on human sociality, overlooks the individuality of humans in the microcosm. In other words, since modern democracy is based on politics by the people, socialism that only considers equality as a result is inconsistent with democracy. For example, it can be understood from a fact similar to the planned uniformity of serving the people and the old totalitarianism as a secondary meaning that deviates from the democratic principle of politics by the people.
Of course, it is inappropriate for socialism and liberalism derived from paternal values to be combined with democracy derived from maternal values. Therefore, it can be seen that it is desirable to generalize maternal democracy, which can solidify democracy by establishing a new maternal distribution style according to the first principle of democracy, which is a sovereign citizen.
This is due to the emergence of modified capitalism, which has undergone system convergence since the early 20th century, or more progressive centrism today as alternatives, which has broadened the people’s choices, but they have become skeptical of democratic politics. In other words, with the advent of neoliberalism, democracy’s political obligations of welfare and decentralization, suppression of polarization, and balanced development, which are the values of democracy, cannot be fulfilled.
In other words, the global era refers to a system based on a new maternal distribution style that is faithful to the maternal values that conform to the nature of democracy beyond socialism or capitalism, and the maternal family has half of the decision-making and power independently and becomes the subject of welfare.
In other words, the global era means that maternal democracy must fulfill its political obligations as a complete democracy in which paternalism and maternalism that exist since birth are balanced to advance into an active welfare society, which is the ideal of mankind.
Therefore, considering the fact that it has developed into an administrative state as a passive welfare society with modified capitalism since the early 20th century following Eastern civilism, Western liberalism, modern democracy, and socialism, it can be expected that ecologically democratic and welfare women will lead an active welfare society at the center of life politics.
Of course, the two factors, the efficiency of the father-in-law, which is the centrifugal force, and the stability of the mother-in-law, which is the centripetal force, were in check and balance, and it is based on the fact that women’s birth and welfare instincts have been constant since time immemorial.
In addition, as the dangerous society created by capitalism can no longer be neglected, it becomes a sustainable society when a system that can implement economic democratization is established and democracy is solidified. In other words, a maternal democracy that can globalize the ‘upper and lower limits of ownership’ would be appropriate as a form of distribution of maternalism that fits the nature of historical development and democracy.
4.4 Guarantee of ‘natural ownership’ expanding natural human rights
The reason for skepticism about capitalism today is that it has caused absolute polarization that realistically undermines the meaning of ‘natural human rights’. In other words, ‘natural human rights’ overlooks the inherent ‘natural ownership’, which is the minimum material basis for living like a human being. In other words, it is a natural legal idea for free competition.
Of course, after the establishment of a modern society established capitalism based on industrialization and the separation of politics and business, it would have been thought that free competition would form the material foundation, the content of ‘natural human rights’, in the society of the time, which was a small economy. In other words, I did not know that early capitalism would become the size of an astronomical economy as it is today.
Therefore, it can be understood that the capitalist system, which induces absolute polarization through the development of the monetary economy capable of a large-scale economy and the breakthrough development of the credit creation function of money, is contrary to the idea of natural law. This is because capitalism is only a ‘natural human right’ for free competition and overlooks ‘natural ownership’ as its content, even though the civil revolution based on natural law ideology was successful and modern society was established.
In other words, ‘natural ownership’ to guarantee ‘natural human rights’ in early capitalism overlooks the fact that it is separate, but not separate, like needles and threads. In other words, just as the body and mind are not separate, the content of ‘natural human rights’, ‘natural ownership’, is not separate.
Of course, even though capitalism was established on the basis of natural law, as a result of neglect of human life, excessive exploitation, and the emergence of socialism, it can be said that ‘natural ownership’ was understood from the fact that a passive welfare state (administrative state) was established by revising capitalism in the early 20th century.
Therefore, just as everything is effective only when it is consistent with one’s words, it can be seen that society should develop history as an active welfare worker that guarantees ‘natural ownership’ that can guarantee ‘natural human rights’ that are structurally consistent with the outside and the inside. (See Economic section)
In other words, the new class, which must live in the global era, should generalize an active welfare society with a “upper and lower limits on ownership” based on the distribution of maternal democracy. This is because the more humanity progresses, the more it must be transformed into a post-polarized society.
Of course, considering the fact that sharing was believed to be human’s duty in the new capitalist society of the mother kingdom, and the fact that a modern society that seeks to realize human dignity is in decentralization, it is reasonable to develop history into a post-polarized society.
Furthermore, the newcomers living in today’s high-tech science and technology era have accumulated the ability to globalize new maternal distribution patterns into universal values. Therefore, it can be seen that the global village era, which places importance on the quality of life beyond the modern society that places importance on the ‘life of possession’, must play an ecologically democratic and welfare women at the center of distribution.
This is because, after the establishment of a modern democratic society based on scientific thinking, academic and scientific technology developed dramatically through positivism, the majority of people were able to escape from ignorance through education and the spread of knowledge through various channels and media, and prejudice against women was resolved.
Additionally, it can be used as a reference to the fact that the matrimonial God-oriented society of thousands of years ago, which had been the mainstream for tens of thousands of years since birth, was a society with a high index of happiness with advanced intuition. This can be understood as an insight because the mid-term maternal society is the same as today’s humans who believed humans to be descendants of the godmother or who achieved the era of high-tech science and technology with infinite imagination and reinvention.
Of course, it can be understood as a record that the Mother’s Divinity Society believed that humans were descendants of the mother-in-law and practiced the belief of the ‘Hae-ho-bok-bon’. Therefore, it can be seen that the mother-in-law’s society is in line with the advanced scientific civilization that humans have achieved today, with the demonstration to prove the truth of the ‘Hae-ho-bok-bon’ by cyclically progressing, exploring and accumulating the truth for a happy life.
In particular, considering the fact that an active welfare society has become possible, such as today’s maternal society, which practiced sharing with confidence as truth by advanced science and technology, the human view of the maternal society that believed humans as descendants of the god is convincing.
Therefore, it can be seen that mankind should develop history into a maternal democracy that allows all mankind to work together to further develop advanced science and technology in order to smoothly carry out mankind’s great tasks such as acknowledging the “Hae-ho-bok,” the only poem of the mother god, exploring the inner world, trying to know the real world of nothing, or exploring or pioneering space astronomy to understand the ultimate purpose of human life.
In addition, concerns may arise suddenly if the capitalist distribution style continues, given that sluggish demand, global division of labor, and raw material depletion created by neoliberalism’s infinite competition are causing significant repercussions even for small shocks caused by free trade.
This is predictable through the results of a number of dinosaur companies crossing the global market in the global era, just as dinosaurs survived by eating recklessly, but died of starvation due to environmental changes caused by external shocks.
For example, it can be understood from the fact that the market function is paralyzed due to unlimited competition by many large corporations, conflicts caused by numerous issues surrounding interests, natural disasters caused by environmental pollution, or a society that few can only accumulate enormous wealth and solve. In other words, the absolute majority of people must live a difficult life in absolute polarization, which leads to poverty.
Therefore, it can be seen that history should be developed into an era in which the market function should be automatically controlled and activated with the ‘ownership limit ceiling system’, which is the distribution style of the mother democracy based on coexistence. In other words, it refers to the establishment of a mother democracy society in which local committees decide to distribute surplus value so that it can be used for the development of advanced scientific civilization, or a material basis for the realization of an active welfare society that is the ideal of mankind through the ‘ownership upper and lower limits’ along with free competition.
Of course, as humanity established a hardware foundation through the development of computers and information and communication through the Third Industrial Revolution, the development of the knowledge and information industry, which is the late revolution, enabled human social cooperation for network human relations, upper and lower limits on ownership, and active welfare society.
In any case, capitalism not only has caused many bad experiences in a very short period of time compared to the long history of mankind, but despite experiencing an unstable society due to overconsumption or polarization, it cannot be expelled because it emphasizes existential individuals and cultivates selfishness.
Professor Heilbrunner writes of this nature of capitalism as follows. In other words, “In general, Keynes and Schumpeter are avoiding the moral problem of ownership system. Let’s raise the heresy question here. The pessimistic consensus on the long-term prospects of capitalism is a fact of moral concern to those who want to professionally justify the social order in which they live. It is questionable that the problematic perspective, such as their prediction of capitalism, does not come from a certain black heart, but that it is strongly reinforcing it.” (115) (Hailbrunner, 132p)
This is because capitalism prioritizes existing individuals over the society that constitutes human nature. It can also be understood from the fact that the legitimacy of the existence of a modern state lies in individualism (liberalism), which presupposes that one’s own destiny is determined and responsible for the outcome. In other words, it refers to a functional state.
Therefore, it can be seen that capitalism is a system created by thinking, just as human sociality and individuality are separated as a result of the harsh oppression of the old era, despite the fact that human beings as subjects cannot separate existence and essence. This can be understood from the fact that capitalism, which was established by emphasizing human individuality amid the remnants of the Western absoluteist climate, tends to pursue economic polarization like the power polarization of the old era.
In early capitalism, when women were in limitations due to severe trials, socialism that emerged led to the creation of the Weimar Constitution as modified capitalism, and even though the Labor Act stipulates “equal wages of equal labor,” most women are still not out of low wages to this day.
Of course, it is true that the power of women who are the main agents of consumption today has changed from before in the information age, and the number of female executives in companies to use it for marketing has increased, but this is only symbolic, and it is not much better in that most women still remain at low wages.
The problem is that as capitalism develops, women in the absolute poor, who are created by inducing absolute polarization, are transformed into sexual beings, undermining motherhood, the centripetal force of mankind. Therefore, it can be seen that a society on the one-sided side of the father, which forms the discord between the centripetal force of the existential mother and the centrifugal force of the imaginary father, must end as a driving force for the world.
This is because women are still discriminated against even though they risked their lives to participate in the civil revolution for the liberation of women with the aim of gender equality. For example, it can be understood in today’s unwelfare neoliberalism, which is against ecologically welfare women.
Additionally, it is important to recall the historical experience of lowering women’s status during periods of conflict if neoliberalism pursues global division and conflicts caused by heterogeneous cultures in each region are formed. This is due to the fact that neoliberalism, which solidifies monetaryism, increases the interdependence formed by the global division of labor, making it a dangerous society.
In other words, capitalism is unable to resolve the conflict caused by increased dependence, which leads to a much stronger ‘economic war’ than all-out war. As a result, it can be seen that capitalism is unable to address the issue, even if the polarization, which is caused by the polarization of a free enterprise that must compete indefinitely to survive neoliberalism, transforms into a transnational multinational giant or moves to an advantageous location for competitiveness.
Of course, in a neoliberal world where anarchic capitalism is highly developed, the social integration function and democratic control of politics have become powerless to the extent that even political uselessness has emerged. And in a capitalist society, panic arose due to difficulties in preventive measures due to desperate interests, and then inflation caused by the government’s credit creation, such as post-medical, intensified competition.
In addition, despite the fact that today’s social costs for security and welfare, which have developed into an astronomical economy unlike in the past, are increasing and the money supply is rapidly increasing due to the lack of tax revenue in the country, human commercialization is accelerating as the economic downturn continues for a long time. And welfare cuts are driving the poor to the streets.
For example, it can be understood from the fact that the number of women who fell into sexual slavery skyrocketed as the cause of the fall of Rome became a unstable society due to extreme inflation caused by the overgrowth of money for the procurement of war expenses. Therefore, politics is trying to solve the economic problems derived from the capitalist distribution style that causes the poor and the rich.
However, it can be seen that there is a limit to the paternal distribution style, considering that the middle class decreases over time due to polarization and the vast majority fall into the poor, causing humanity to deteriorate. Therefore, it can be understood that the implementation of the maternal distribution style is reasonable due to the activities of female NGOs that have maternal values.
In order to solve the problem of capitalism that causes periodic panic, the welfare state was embodied by Keynes (1883-1946), who insisted on normalizing the market function through effective demand by the government’s welfare expenditure, and it was able to contribute significantly to the soft landing of panic and the growth of the passport.
However, as a result of the creation of large corporations due to the enlargement of bureaucrats and non-market government sectors, neoliberalism centered on advanced countries that justified welfare reduction and polarization to dismantle protectionist barriers is globalizing.
Of course, it can be said that it is a regression of history in that it is inconsistent with unwelfare neoliberalism and ecologically welfare women. In other words, it is wrong to make women unhappy with absolute polarization, even though women were alienated from the power polarization of the old era, and women have become new people today following their unhappiness in modern capitalism.
Furthermore, as neoliberalism, which aims to divide the world, increases interdependence, it is difficult for individual countries to overcome if important raw materials such as oil are in short supply or panic caused by numerous variables due to the financial crisis or globalization of one developed country.
This is because, as neoliberalism centered on developed countries rejected planningism for a welfare state in principle, the global polarization formed as a result of competition for survival among large corporations resulted in mass production of the poor, and a dangerous society caused by environmental pollution and resource depletion due to overconsumption became globalized. In other words, an unstable society became solidified as the world transformed into a giant capital battlefield.
For example, large changes in the ecological environment caused by excessive competition can be understood from the fact that human commercialization accelerates along with the collapse of the food chain, food shortages due to extreme weather, disease caused by environmental pollution, the seriousness of global warming, and other ominous signs.
Therefore, it can be seen that the liberal distribution style can no longer guarantee a happy life for mankind, given the negative consequences of environmental destruction caused by capitalist production style. Therefore, it is understandable that a parent democracy system that globalizes a new distribution style must be established to realize the diamond-shaped social structure as it proves that capitalism cannot create the diamond-shaped social structure on its own.
Of course, the fact that various non-governmental international organizations (NGOs), such as the women’s mainstream global green life movement, are struggling with multinational large capital can be seen as preparing for post-capitalism. This does not believe in democratic politics that are helpless to capitalism, and the creation of a non-governmental organization itself as a means of self-rescue measures can be seen as a pre-stage for the establishment of a new system.
This is because the association of international NGOs for the protection of ecosystems, prevention of environmental pollution, prevention of resource abuse, overcoming polarization, and the anti-poverty movement, centered on righteous people, is at odds with transnational dinosaur companies.
Furthermore, in the era of a global global community where we live by mass production and consumption, transnational multinational corporations need non-governmental organizations on an international scale, as large organizations, including cooperative groups of small and medium-sized enterprises, along with funding power, are no different from territorial kingdoms like the Vatican. In other words, it is the same as globalizing a new mode of distribution for the end of paternalism.
Competition among large multinational corporations today is as violent as an economic war without gunfire, and the destruction of ecosystems caused by resource depletion and environmental pollution due to unprecedented astronomical overconsumption, the reduction of agricultural and livestock products due to acid rain and insect damage, and the change of global maps as glaciers melt due to increased diseases.
Capitalism, in principle, cannot resolve the absolute polarization of 1:99 formed as it aims to accumulate indefinitely, and in principle, has no social responsibility. As a result, it can be seen that capitalism, which induces polarization, is not only opposed to natural law, but also to a happy life, the ultimate purpose of human life, in that the absolute majority becomes unhappy.
Therefore, it can be seen that the distribution style of the mother democracy, which solidifies the democratic lifestyle, which is “one person, one vote” based on personality, should be globalized in order to escape the monetism of “one person, multi-stockism” that is inconsistent with the global era.
In addition, as capitalism develops, many mid-sized companies are being subordinated or withdrawn as subcontractors of giant companies due to fierce competition among many giant companies. In other words, small and medium-sized enterprises are in a sandwich situation, as if the small and medium-sized enterprises in developing countries are ‘crushing their backs in a whale fight’. In other words, independent SMEs are collapsing due to competition between large companies and large companies consisting of small and medium-sized enterprises in solidarity.
This is due to the fact that while numerous companies are being forced out, surviving large corporations are weakened in the process of competition between transnational giants such as significant management skills, technological advantage, non-market participation in national demand, and large capital, feeding on more companies. For example, the fact that only a few companies have existed for more than 100 years in the United States until recently can be understood.
Therefore, it can be seen that the nature of capitalism is the cause of the increase in collective action or anti-social crimes by forming powerful groups like illegal unions with a cynical attitude that denies capitalism. Therefore, it is natural that various terrorism is triggered in a capitalist society that turns humans into ‘economic animals’.
For reference, in the case of dinosaurs that were extinguished on Earth long before the appearance of modern humans, as a scientific hypothesis, the cause of starvation or illness and annihilation by changing the Earth’s environment due to the collision of comets was probably a threat to the tyranny of dinosaurs and was destroyed by balancing the food chain.
In other words, just as a huge dinosaur can be expelled even by a small change in the global environment, if polarization is consolidated by a large group of companies. Even a small impact will have a huge impact on the collapse of a giant company, making it difficult to overcome the crisis.
For example, it can be understood from the recent fact that giant companies around the world are in turmoil today due to the financial crisis. Therefore, it is clear that a new political and economic system must be established for the globalization of a new maternal distribution style to maintain a stable society.
Therefore, it can be seen that it should be historically developed as a society based on maternal values such as welfare, life of existence, life of relationships leading to Daewooju and microcosm, consideration, tenderness, exploration of the inner world, exchange with other invisible dimensions, decentralization, depolarization, concession, delicacy, network relationships, and service, which were unconsciously belittled as incompetent and weak in the paternal society.
In other words, in order for mankind to develop history, a system that fosters and matures the good and soft nature of human beings must be implemented when we recall that today’s global era has been created as a result of social cooperation to achieve the public good. This is because if the polarization of wealth, which contradicts today’s democratic ideals of human dignity, welfare, and decentralization, is solidified, it will become a more dangerous society than the power polarization of the old era.
Of course, it can be used as a reference in the society of the new mother-in-law, who believed the god mother-in-law (the Great Universe) as the only god in the founding father-in-law, cultivated a good spirit and practiced sharing as a descendant of the god-in-law who personified Daewoo-ju. This is because there are many soft and defensive entities that actually survive on Earth. For example, this can be understood from the fact that absolute feudalism was removed and a democracy was established based on consideration and soft maternal values.
Of course, it can be seen as a different aspect of absolutism that capitalism created in the old soil based on paternalism developed into absolute polarization today. This can be understood from the fact that despite the establishment of a modern democratic society in the West, absolutism that has long dominated has remained and various forms of totalitarianism have been created.
Just as human beings made up of harmony between the flesh and the culture (value), individual and social, soul, mind, and body cannot be biased toward any one, it can be seen that there must be a system that harmonizes economic and non-economic things. In other words, since human beings cannot be satisfied no matter how many goods they own, they need an uneconomic political religion and a system that balances the metaphysical economy.
In other words, if capitalism continues to develop excessively biased toward the economy as if its ultimate purpose is possession, it cannot live a happy life, the ultimate purpose of human life, due to human degradation. Therefore, it can be seen that democratic politics, which is the ideal of mankind, should advance to the universalization of the mother democracy as a complete democracy that guarantees ‘natural ownership’ rather than a half-democracy that remains only in the procedural definition for economic liberalism.
And it can be seen that domestic labor, such as the re-creation, care, and rearing of motherhood, should be compensated in a maternal distribution style as it becomes the basis of the economy as humanity’s centripetal force, even though it is not wage labor. This is because women in charge of housework, which cannot be chosen unlike wage labor, are at a disadvantage over men in free competition.
Therefore, it can be seen that an active welfare society in which the government shares part of the compensation for domestic labor for family welfare, childbirth and child rearing, and elderly welfare should be globalized for the majority of mothers who must be in charge of family welfare with an ecological structure. This is because family welfare for family stability is important for social stability as a basic organization of society.
For example, family welfare and social welfare would be France’s ‘family allowance system’, which was created by considering them as the same. In other words, the period of childbirth and rearing is an important period in which a basic program that achieves desirable humanity is formed, and the government pays a family allowance (social cost) to mothers of low-income families who need welfare in the long run for a harmonious and stable society.
Therefore, it can be seen that liberalism, a Western value, is progressing beyond capitalism combined with democracy, which is a maternal value, to an active welfare society based on a more advanced economic democracy for the globalization of the maternal distribution style. Of course, given that France has a family allowance system along with the development of information and communication, which is the third industrial revolution, and that it is being developed by social enterprises as a welfare community based on local autonomy in Sweden, globalization of active welfare society will be feasible.
In other words, an active welfare society, which has been longed for human ideals since time immemorial, became possible in the era of the global village. In other words, it means that the globalization of active welfare society based on the maternal distribution style is a human mission. However, in the passive welfare state (administrative state) that took shape after World War II, it has not realized the globalization of active welfare society, but is moving backward to an unwelfare neoliberal society.
In other words, even though the democratic distribution style must be globalized in order to historically develop into an active welfare society, which is the ideal of mankind, the solidification of the liberal distribution style itself contradicts historical development. Of course, this reverse course appeared to be a dangerous society made up of absolute polarization, environmental pollution, explosive conflict, and hatred formed on the premise of a number of unfortunate lives.
It can be seen that it is time for a system that solidifies democracy in a new maternal distribution method consistent with the essence of democracy, just as a strong and large ship that overcomes the natural phenomenon of wind and waves can be built so that we can all live together. In other words, it is better to prepare for a quick exit rather than sticking to a framework that has already experienced numerous pains and can continue to cause unhappiness in the future.
In other words, rather than living a life of mutual conflict, we should fundamentally revolutionize the system for a win-win life. It would be desirable to globalize the ‘ownership limit system’ based on social consensus, rather than blaming poverty, humanity degradation, fearless spirit, and antisocial tendencies made by each individual’s concessions as a result of causal retribution, just like a fire butterfly burning itself up in a capitalist society that forms ‘poverty in abundance’.
In other words, you can live a happy life, the ultimate purpose of human life, when you escape from capitalism that commodifies humans themselves. Therefore, it can be seen that maternal democracy should be universalized as a complete democracy based on a democratic distribution style for a sustainable life.
Part II. Human Dignity Chapter 1. The Age of Human Dignity The dictionary…
Chapter 4. Conclusion We already knew that the poor Ok-soon, who was introduced earlier,…
Chapter 3. The happy life of a new generation 1. A history of human…
Chapter 2. Beyond capitalism According to the French Declaration of Human Rights, "the principle…
Part 6. The political philosophy of the mother …
Chapter 3. Neoliberalism 1. Neoliberalism contrary to the global zeitgeist 1.1 Capitalism that…