The dictionary meaning of human rights is that ‘the fundamental right in human survival, formally speaking, is the right to be guaranteed first before the constitution, which is the basic law of the state.’
Even though human rights are important as a standard for interpreting laws like this, why do they generally look like picky people when it comes to human rights? Also, why neglect about human rights is the highest value of human dignity in that human rights are the basic rights guaranteed by law on the basis of natural law (natural rights)?
This can be answered by the fact that despite the fact that the great legacy of modern society must be maintained at the cost of the civil revolution, it has lived a harder life with more war and imperialism than in the old days.
This can be attributed to capitalism that aims for the polarization of wealth, such as the polarization of power in the old era, despite the collapse of the absolute feudal system and the establishment of modern democracy based on relativism. This is also serving as a reason for human rights to remain in a declarative sense when interests collide even in the liberal (individualist) system expressed in natural law.
In other words, as liberalism based on paternalistic distribution forms a pluripotentism that encourages polarization, it is inconsistent with the modern spirit based on human dignity.
Especially after the establishment of a modern democratic society based on paternalism, it is true that the expansion of the ruling party was achieved, but it can be understood from the fact that the absolute majority of women are invariably socially disadvantaged like the old era. Of course, as a result of racism and other characteristics, sexism formed by paternalism for a long time.
Therefore, new people who have to live in a global society should live in an active welfare society with a five-to-five gender equality index due to the globalization of the new motherhood based on democratic, welfare, and limited distribution.
This is because despite more than 200 years of declaring the Declaration of Human Rights, the development of history for human dignity is regressing due to polarization, the result of capitalist distribution. Therefore, it will be meaningful to look into the history of Western human rights, which is the result of the civil revolution, which is the basis of today’s concept of human rights.
Liberalism emerged in the 14th century when medieval Europe rejected Hebrism, leaving the dark ages of the 13th century, and the Renaissance based on Hellenism in Ancient Greece. In addition, with the development of natural law and empiricism, a modern democratic society could be established as the Industrial Revolution took place.
It is worth noting that this set of phenomena is based on paternalism. This is because the teachings of the saints, who showed that man is a spiritual being through a life of consistency of speech and action, can be seen as guaranteed human dignity later by law.
Of course, it is in line with the belief that the matrimonial God-oriented society believes that humans are spiritual beings as descendants of God. In other words, just as the matrilineal society believed that the god-man(Saint), who has undergone numerous cycles of progress, appeared for the salvation of mankind, it is the result of Saint(a true man) making people realize human dignity by teaching in accordance with local characteristics.
Thus, modern civil society was established in Western society based on paternalism (1642), the honorary revolution (1688), the American Revolution (1776) and the French Revolution (1789), and the Declaration of Human Rights, which was the cause of the civil revolution, was not made by accident.
Of course, there is a long history of human dignity based on humanism that humans are the subjects of all things in the East. This can be seen from the democratic principle that the people are heaven and the people are kings.
In other words, the ‘Heaven-Earth-Human’ idea based on yin and yang theory is similar in terms of natural law and human dignity in the West, as it is thought that a person is at the center of it as a subject. Thus, relativism, created in reaction to Western absolutism, is the same in terms of modern democracy and humanism in the East, but fundamentally different.
In other words, liberalism (individualism), which is based on natural law that says that people have natural rights as creatures, and democracy, which considers humans to be subjects, not creatures.
This can be understood from the fact that democraticism is an ancient Eastern idea that values harmony with all things in the world, and Western liberalism, which is originated in law, is a rule of law that values only human interactions.
For example, it can be understood from the fact that while the East, which is based on civil fundamentalism, was somewhat balanced between men and women, women were alienated due to discrimination between teenagers and one. In other words, Eastern democraticism recognized the people as heaven and human beings themselves as subjects of life.
This can be understood from the fact that humans have ordered to live the life of so-called who set an example by grinding themselves and cleaning themselves according to their autonomy as subjects.
Therefore, it can be seen that there is a difference from the concept of Western natural rights, which is unconditional rather than the conditional East. Therefore, it can be understood that the fact that Western natural law embodies human dignity as a fundamental right of man itself is more active than that of the East.
For example, Western natural law ideas can be understood from the fact that modern society was created as a civil revolution to embody human dignity. However, as liberalism based on human individuality incongrues with human sociality to create a dangerous society, it is necessary to guarantee ‘natural ownership,’ which is also the essence of natural law, as part of natural rights.
In other words, it is in line with the purpose of natural law to develop history into an active welfare society based on maternal distribution that guarantees the minimum physical basis for the implementation of human dignity.
Modern society was formed as a result of the civil revolution, in which 18C natural law thinkers John Locke, Russo, and Montesquieu theorized about social contracts and natural human rights, followed by capitalism formed by the Industrial Revolution.
In other words, liberalism shook the absolute feudal system, social contract theory was spread by the Enlightenment, and the civil revolution caused by corruption in the old era created modern society, along with a revolution in production style by the Industrial Revolution.
This is written by jurist Kwon Young-sung as follows. “In his theory of civil government, human beings were governed by natural law in pre-establishment states, and all human beings enjoyed their own rights to freedom of life and property under natural law. Locke’s theory of natural rights or natural rights became a major theoretical basis for the formation of human rights ideas.” (73) (Kwon Young-sung, Enemy of Constitutional Law 1992, 240p)
However, it is true that the result of the civil revolution based on natural law made it possible for women to live a new life, but at that time, it was nothing more than a natural law of men. This is because the lives of most female leaders who participated in the revolution and called for the promotion of passports ended with disastrous results.
For the establishment of modern society, women actively participated in the revolution and paid the price of sacrifice, without reward, making female leaders incompetent, ignoring and even executing due to their long tradition of denigrating women. In other words, boiling and eating hounds after the hunt means that he was attacked by “Tossagupin”(killing the dog after hunting).
Undeterred, however, women’s endless commitment to increase their passports could improve the human rights of the socially disadvantaged, as well as themselves, and created the Weimar Constitution.
And the Declaration of Human Rights of the French Revolution states, ‘All human beings are created equal and survive freely. Social discrimination can only be established for the common good.’ However, Han Sang-beom, a constitutional scholar, writes that there were limitations in reality.
“Citizens` fundamental rights have always been limited since the beginning. The French Declaration of Human Rights (1789) was originally starting with the premise of distinguishing between “active citizens” and “passive citizens”. It is a fact that we all know that women and lower class citizens who are passive citizens are exempt from human rights entertainment, and we may have to understand the social limitations of the times that are inevitable at the time.” (74) (Han Sang-beom, Basic Human Rights, Jeong Eumsa 1985p)
As such, women at that time were capable of actively participating in the revolution for women’s liberation, and there was a clear sense of human rights, but women classified as passive citizens had a hard life due to housework and childbirth.
Bebelle writes: “In short, it was purely a kitchen maid, and attending Sunday’s church service was the only consolation. Marriage was only possible within the same social class, and the exclusive consciousness of the other classes dominated all relationships. Daughters were raised in these spiritual circumstances and their seclusion at home was strictly enforced.
There was no mental education and therefore their mental domain was not beyond the narrowest range of household chores. —
On top of that, empty and vulgar formalism was added, forming the framework of culture and spirit, and women’s lives were truly a one-size-fits-all punishment.
The spirit of the Reformation has degenerated into stubborn bureaucratic formalism, and the instinctive impulses and pleasures of life have disappeared due to mountains of rules of living that obliterate it, referred to as ‘dignified’. Emptiness and intolerance dominated the civil class, so people lived under dreary oppression and miserable constraints.” (75) (Bevel 105P)
It’s hard to understand that you’re alienated just because you’re a woman, but it’s a historical fact. This can be understood by the fact that many extraordinary female leaders, such as Mrs. Roland, who participated in the French Revolution, disappeared into the dew of guillotine.
In other words, despite women’s participation in the revolution to establish a modern society based on universal peace and human dignity, Western Christian culture that emotionally did not tolerate women’s political forces existed. In other words, in Western Christian culture, women are passive citizens and rootless flower arrangements, indicating that female leaders had no political power.
Of course, it can be seen as the result of the consolidation of the culture of disparaging women, formed by the symbolism of “Hawah,” a woman who is the original sinner who lost the paradise of mankind preached by Christianity, into emotions or institutions.
Therefore, women could understand that it was difficult to participate in politics, even though a modern democratic society based on relativism was established because the enslavement of women in Western paternalistic society was solidified as prisoners of war.
It is also possible to understand why women were marginalized in ancient legal philosophy based on Christian law. This can be understood in the next article by jurist Kim Cheol-soo. “Thrasymachos, who saw the concept of justice in the interests of the strong among Sophists, argued that ‘justice is not more than the interests of the more powerful.
Every government makes laws in its own interest. Democratic politics makes democratic laws, despotism makes despotism, and so does other governments. So once they make the law they insist on what benefits themselves is justice to the people. Therefore, those who violate it are punished as those who violate the law and justice.
Socrates, the best man, this is what I’m trying to say, justice for all nations is the same thing that benefits an established government. The Government are in power. Therefore, justice is in the interests of the more powerful in all cases for those who reason correctly.” Later scholars refer to this concept as national justice.” (76) (Kim Cheol-soo, Law and Social Justice, SNU Press, 1991.87p)
The human rights declaration of freedom, equality, and philanthropy, which were the causes of the civil revolution, provided an opportunity to prove that human beings were human nature is good orientation and to establish a modern society, a great legacy of mankind.
In other words, it is a human victory that laid the foundation for realizing human dignity. In particular, the independence of human beings from the paternal monotheism allowed women to worship the maternal monotheism freely, and it was groundbreaking in that women organized to create a system consistent with their ecological characteristics of welfare and democracy.
However, capitalism, which motivates human selfishness, has put the world in trouble due to imperialism, a result of political and business ties created by justifying greed, but many wars have put modern society in danger.
In other words, the declaration of human rights for all mankind created a modern society, but like the old era, with paternalism monopolizing power, the colonial region considered the declaration of human rights as a deceptive measure to exploit it.
In addition, in a modern society based on natural jurisprudence, discrimination between men and women still existed, and the problem is that they remain at the National Assembly about 10 to 1 until today, when they have to live as new people.
In other words, despite the early struggle between men and women to bring down the feudal dynasty, female leaders were thrown to the core of power by male leaders and have not yet gained half of their power to this day.
Therefore, 200 years after the Declaration of Human Rights, it can be seen that the gender equality index should be developed into a globalization of a system that can implement a five-to-five ratio.
In other words, in order to live as a newcomer in the global village era, an active welfare society must be implemented under a new maternal distribution system to ensure the effectiveness of the five-to-five human rights declaration.
Of course, women who have been oppressed over thousands of years will be able to lead the implementation of an active welfare society that is ecologically compatible with women as they are increasing their passports themselves.
This is because it can be seen that women’s association for the effectiveness of the Declaration of Human Rights has improved the human rights of the socially disadvantaged, and as a result, a passive but welfare state has been established.
In other words, the declaration of human rights in the early capitalist society, which was like pie in the sky, established a welfare state consistent with ecologically welfare and democratic women, making it effective.
This is the result of the French Constitution of 1791, which states that neither colonial nor domestic human rights should be guaranteed, nor war for conquest. In other words, in order to overcome the chaotic society of the time, women activists presented a matrilineal solution, a welfare society.
It means that female leaders have narrowed the gap between law and reality, which was only an empty promise in real life as a cause of class struggle and a declaration of human rights only for men. Therefore, it is time for ecologically welfare women to have half the power and to play an active role in the politics of living for the realization of an active welfare society.
Out of the Middle Ages, Western society entered an era of uncertainty, and the absolute feudal system weakened day by day, and the industrial revolution caused by scientific certainty led to a revolution in capitalist production.
In other words, the Industrial Revolution led to the call for change, and the corrupt absolute dynasty based on paternalism was expelled from the civil revolution, thus establishing a modern society.
In other words, it is a modern society based on the idea of natural law that humans should be equal as a dignified being, as humans have ‘natural rights’ granted from heaven since birth.
In other words, as the liberalism of not interfering with free competition has been carried out by the success of the civil revolution, it has become an era of functional countries in which individual lives take precedence over the state.
In other words, it refers to a society that assumes that individuals are responsible for welfare instead of being guaranteed freedom and equality by themselves as subjects of the state according to the belief that material abundance through free competition will liberate humans.
However, early capitalism enabled capitalists to accumulate endlessly, freedom of contract was a trap of exploitation for workers as socially disadvantaged, and rather a society that never had the benefit of the feudal dynasty.
And not only did women and the elderly have the freedom to become beggars, to complain of exploitation and poverty, but free contracts have always been slave contracts that legalize exploitation, as capitalists frequently change words to accumulate capital.
Thus, the old era was expelled, but it can be seen that the fundamental instinct stronger than totalitarianism made it a tough society. In other words, as ‘natural rights’ have become nothing more than a formal right for distributionism, the poor have become a cold society with nowhere to complain about.
For example, not only did the extreme conflict to accumulate capital create imperialism, but the mobilization of war and poverty led to extreme public resentment and inability to maintain the system. This can be understood by the fact that Karl Marx and Frederick Engels of Germany declared the Communist Manifesto in 1848.
In other words, there was a socialist idea that criticized capitalism as a window dressing, but the Communist Party showed up because it was hard enough to be fascinated by the extreme communism that wanted to oust stubborn capitalism.
Capitalism was, of course, modified by the success of the October Revolution of 1917 in Russia when communist society emerged as a reality. This was due to the removal of representative democracy and pluralist party systems, and the nationalization of land or means of production as a planned economy, resulting in a successful industrial revolution that was slower than Europe.
In other words, as an example of a socialist welfare state, it was on the verge of spreading to neighboring countries and collapsing the capitalist system.
In other words, these facts not only surprised European capitalists, but also recognized that social welfare was advantageous to productivity and businesses, and gave them a chance to rethink the meaning of the civil revolution. This is why it has turned to a passive welfare state that conforms to the welfare nature of modern democracy.
Free entrepreneurs accepted state intervention, and the 1919 Weimar Constitution established the basic framework of the so-called passive welfare state, with modified capitalism presupposing state welfare responsibility, which stipulated social laws based on the right to live.
In the Weimar Constitution (Article 151(2)), ‘the order of economic life should conform to the principles of justice to ensure human life for all human beings,’ extending human fundamental rights to freedom, equality, and social rights (the right to survive, the third volume of labor).
The welfare state began in 1929 when the United States went through the Great Depression and created a welfare system in return for concessions to industrial peace. In fact, however, the welfare system was properly established after the adoption of the Beverage Report of the British Parliament in 1942 during World War II.
After the establishment of modern society, there have been many trials and errors from early capitalism (liberalism), which focuses on human individuality, to modified capitalism that respects human sociality.
This can be attributed to too many conflicts of desire to achieve wealth in the mammonism order, where money became a character, after the status system formed by the power or personality of the absolute feudal system was expelled.
Of course, liberal ideas formed by Western society, which was an absolute feudal system of paternalism, collapsed the feudal system, but capitalism created in the totalitarian soil was also extreme.
This can be understood from the fact that the prevalence of the power polarization of the absolute feudal system in the Western world is causing the absolute polarization of 1:99 by capitalism created by the Industrial Revolution.
This can be attributed to capitalism’s creation of imperialism, an unprecedented war that made mankind hard due to World War I, World War II, numerous conflicts, and the Cold War, and dangerous society caused by environmental pollution, ecosystem destruction, and absolute polarization caused by greed.
Therefore, it can be seen that the capitalist distribution style that runs counter to decentralization, which is the purpose of the establishment of modern society, should be expelled.
2. Historical development in women’s time
After Western women participated in the civil revolution for 100 years, they won the right to vote and suffrage in the early 20th century, enabling them to become a welfare state suitable for them.
In other words, it was paid for the participation of the French Revolution and the declaration of the ruling party, and after the Weimar Constitution was established in 1944, women actively participated in politics.
For example, the 1776 Declaration of Independence stipulated the right to pursue happiness, but it is understandable that the welfare system was established after World War II.
In other words, the welfare-oriented women’s rights declaration was only in a declarative sense. This is because women could not form an organization because the West has long been a society that has long alienated women and, as Trasimakos claims, jumped on the strong.
That is, due to the moral or social and cultural climate derived from Christian culture, women could not express ideas that could form their own political forces.
Of course, long-slavery women could not do anything with no place to complain about human rights abuses, violence, imprisonment and torture, even if women were subjected to them as proletives and socially disadvantaged.
Despite the long-lasting consequences of this devastated state, gender discrimination can be seen as the reason for maintaining about 10 to 1. Of course, throughout the East and West, all modern women were academically poor, and there was discrimination between men and women because there was no extraordinary leader or saint.
This may be because women had no educational opportunity in subordination to the patriarch and had a hard life with housework, parenting, and side jobs. However, after the establishment of modern society, female leaders fought tooth and nail among meaningful women as women’s political alienation remained, and even accused parents’ monopoly politics through death, setting a new turning point in the anti-discrimination law.
For example, during the French Revolution, M.O. Guju disappeared from the guillotine of Jacoba to dew because women had the same right to be guillotine as men. In other words, the sacrifices of extraordinary female leaders who lived their lives like goddesses of salvation were given a chance to rethink the meaning of the ruling party declaration caused by extreme gender inequality.
In other words, the sacrifices of extraordinary female leaders who lived their lives like goddesses of salvation were given a chance to rethink the meaning of the women’s rights declaration caused by extreme gender inequality.
Today, most countries have constitutional guarantees gender equality, and anti-discrimination laws have been stipulated in the Labor Standards Act, a sub-corporation, to ensure effectiveness. However, it is also true that it is not realistic as avoidance technology is being developed enough not to be kept.
In other words, the effectiveness of the law has been questioned emotionally, so it remains in a declarative sense. Thus, the problem of gender equality is a representative example of law and reality.
This is because there is an anti-discrimination law, but in reality and emotionally, men and women are unequal while the father-in-law monopolizes political power. In other words, in a world dominated by paternal values, men become mainstream and women become non-mainstream. Therefore, women must have equal political power with men in order to have the effectiveness of gender equality laws.
This is because there is no other way than to maintain the effectiveness of the law as a political association that can create social consensus as social sentiment is a component of making the law as a general intention.
For example, equal pay for equal labor under the Labor Standards Act is pie in the sky for women, but it can be understood from the fact that motherhood becomes a reality when it has political power enough to balance with fatherhood.
Of course, if Western women recall the Weimar Constitution declared a passive welfare society because of its 100-year struggle and association, including the civil revolution, it would become a reality.
In other words, although the emotions of gender discrimination that have been consolidated over thousands of years cannot be overcome at once, it can be predicted that mankind can develop its history into an active welfare society as it experiences a passive welfare society.
For example, the teachings of the ancient saints can be understood from the fact that the results of the teachings shown by Dangun’s humanitarianism, the mercy of Sakyamuni, the morality of Laozi, the courtesy of Confucius, the love of Jesus, and the golden rule of Muhammad appear in today’s global age.
In addition, considering the female NGOs leading the green life movement and the efforts of the past to implement a decentralized distribution style, we can see that it is developing into an active welfare society. Of course, the realistic reason for the globalization of an active welfare society is that it has become a dangerous society so that a political culture that practices the teachings of saint should be formed.
Anyway, Article 11 of the Korean Constitution states that all citizens are equal before the law. No one is discriminated against in all areas of political, economic, social, or cultural life by gender, religion, or social status.’ In addition, Article 36(1) stipulates freedom of marriage, gender equality, and democratic institutional security for the family system, and in the Sixth Republic, the state shall strive to improve women’s welfare and rights.
It states that the state should strive for maternal protection. In addition, the Family Act, the Gender Discrimination Act, and the Family Register Act were recently revised. Therefore, it can be said that it has advanced in that it shows a firm will to abolish the existing patriarchal system for the effectiveness of guaranteeing human rights.
This is significant in that it is the result of women’s rapid growth and competence after the establishment of a modern society. Of course, women’s rights and obligations are the same, as are men, as are guaranteed by law. However, women and men are heterogeneous, and in some cases the content of their obligations may differ.
This is because despite the fact that gender equality is guaranteed as a right in the actual law, discrimination sentiment remains due to the long tradition and customs of paternalism. For example, it can be understood from the fact that paternalism has long dominated consciousness as a mainstream, even though anti-discrimination laws guarantee effectiveness.
Gender equality, of course, is a political issue that stems from the socio-cultural basis before the law, and if there is institutional support to support competence, there will be a real equality of 5:5.
In other words, if women globalize a maternalist system based on matriarchal distribution, the Gender Equality Act will be effective. Therefore, it can be understood that efforts to overcome discrimination against individual women who believe in the guarantee of equal rights in the Constitution and wish to be equal according to the law are like hitting eggs on rocks.
Thus, socially disadvantaged women can understand the need to form an independent party to organize and implement matriarchal distribution forms, such as trade unions that can form equal relationships between users and workers, or to establish a political system that guarantees the same number of lawmakers. I hope you take the political side of this.
And democracy has a political obligation, as each different gender, to balance checks and balances on an equal footing between matriarchy and paternalism. This is because the law formed by general doctors must be in line with the modern spirit established to realize human dignity, just as the stability of the law is observed only when it conforms to the social value system.
Thus, we can see that a democracy with matriarchal values has a political obligation to develop a system in which the matriarchal system is in charge of the axis of politics with the matriarch along with the matriarchal system.
Of course, for the effectiveness of equality between men and women guaranteed by the Constitution, women activists are at the center to create realistic forces (organizational forces) and enforce them under anti-discrimination laws, but there must be fundamental system changes such as the establishment of “mother democracy.”
Of course, this is possible because human dignity is set as the highest value in the Constitution, the political norm of modern society based on natural law. However, there remains a task that “natural ownership” must be guaranteed as a material foundation, which is the content of “natural rights” to improve human dignity.
In addition, gender equality can be seen as nothing but a political investigation in the absence of a political power to carry out matriarchism as a check force balanced with the paternal order. Therefore, it can be expected that the political and economic system of motherhood for the establishment of an active welfare society that guarantees the effectiveness of “natural rights” can guarantee the effectiveness of gender equality.
As capitalism developed, the technology of capital accumulation became more advanced, leading to a situation that humans could not solve due to human devastation, environmental pollution, and collapse of the food chain. In other words, he learned that unilateral paternalism is creating a dangerous society due to the absolute polarization of 1:99.
In other words, I am aware that we need to move forward with a new matriarchal distribution pattern. Therefore, it can be seen that the system for matriarchal distribution forms should be globalized as paternalism distribution forms cannot implement gender equality level passport growth. Because beyond formal equality, it is actually a political issue to be guaranteed equality.
Of course, human rights are defined by law, so it is also obliged to protect and develop the human rights declaration through creating and promoting a climate for human rights improvement, overhauling the system, willingness to abide by the law, and active participation.
In other words, when ignoring or treating the human rights declaration unfairly, they are forced to follow it as an independent association or to develop history by creating a system. This can be well understood in the writings of constitutional scholar Han Sang-beom. “From historical experience, everyone’s rights have never been automatically guaranteed in any society of any era.
Another obvious exception was that although vested interests or benefits were unjustified, it was rather rare for the parties to abandon themselves. That is what it is still saying. Justice is a noble ideal, but in reality we know that staying put does not mean that it is done. —–
In particular, one of the most important problems in this era is that social organizations or political systems cannot be properly managed without the active and self-reliant participation and participation of their members. Montesquieu described the political qualities of a citizen as the virtue of a citizen.
It is because it is in this society that we live freely, and this society cannot be left politics. What Thomas Mann said about the German citizens who entered the Nazi rule should bear in mind that ‘the people who despise politics have no choice but to have politics that are contemptible.’
If we are worried about the crisis of civilization, but still believe in the development of society, one’s status has improved little by little throughout history and it appears as freedom.” (77) (Han Sang-beom 13p) Recalling that a modern society was established with the legacy of natural law embodied by wise men who understood the teachings of Great teacher, one can understand that mankind has a duty to strive to improve human rights.
Adams declared in 1783 that women do not have to abide by the Republican Constitution if the New Constitution of the United States does not recognize women’s right to vote. And black people who suffered extreme racism after the Civil War also had suffrage.
Thus, in the case of women, it can be seen that Western values that alienated women from the fact that they obtained suffrage around 1920 dominated the ceremony. In Britain, women gained suffrage in 1918 due to a power struggle, while defending the women’s suffrage bill submitted by J. S. Mill in the National League of the Women’s Suffrage Association and the Women’s Social and Political Alliance.
In other words, over 100 years after the establishment of modern society, women were only able to obtain suffrage in the early 20th century as a result of their hard work.
Thus, despite the incapacitation of women over thousands of years, the rapid expansion of women’s rights after the establishment of modern society shows that potential political power is emerging.
Of course, the political sense was excellent enough to maintain a peaceful society for a long time as a shared system for the realization of a welfare society in a matriarchalistic society. Therefore, it can be expected that in order to realize the active welfare society, which is the ideal of mankind, a political and economic system can be established in which the father and mother families are balanced with political checks.
The Human Rights Declaration of the Russian Socialist Revolution of 1918 criticized capitalism as the Declaration of Rights of the People Exploited. In other words, human rights without economic fundamentals were declared meaningless. This can be seen as the main reason why capitalism has changed to modified capitalism.
In other words, liberalism, which values human individuality, had to balance human sociality. In other words, national capitalism has given up the Nachtwachterstaat of laissez-faire as it guarantees the so-called labor rights, which added basic social rights as a living zone.
This led to the denial of the absoluteness of ownership in order to implement a welfare state, which allowed passive interference by the state for social welfare by revising non-welfare laissez-faire. This can be understood from the fact that workers’ associations are guaranteed by social justice-based social laws in order to live a human life on their own.
In other words, it developed into an administrative state that embraced a planned economy for full employment in order to achieve its welfare obligations. Early capitalism, of course, was the result of recognizing the dangers of liberalism, which created frequent conflicts of interest and the expansion of the poor caused by periodic panic.
Therefore, it can be seen that liberalism had to yield one step due to unprecedented social conflicts arising from large-scale economies that mankind had never experienced. In other words, as the development of exploitation technology expanded the poor, state intervention was needed to prevent human devastation and family dissolution caused by the periodic panic of capitalists and workers alike.
And as capitalism, which is based on profit maximization, prefers female workers who work well at low wages, it had to allow state intervention in terms of maternal protection. Therefore, it can be understood that the creation of employment by welfare spending and government investment was a desperate measure to maintain the capitalist system.
Therefore, recognizing that the human rights declaration of freedom, equality, and philanthropy is based on welfare, one can see that a ‘mother-democracy’ system should be globalized that enables women to become the main body of welfare society.
This is because it is difficult for an ecologically welfare-oriented society to act as a person who develops policies or creates systems as beneficiaries of welfare as well as family welfare.
And as revised capitalism has enlarged the planned economy to implement a welfare society and weakened the function of the market along with the abolition of politics and business, it can be seen that unwelfare neoliberalism is a very disadvantageous ideology for ecologically welfare and democratic women.
Therefore, it can be seen that a new system should be established in which women participate in parliament, the administration, and the judiciary to become the main players of living politics that values the practice of welfare policies.
In other words, in order to overcome the dangerous society caused by a modern democratic society based on paternal democracy, we must advance to a matriarchal democratic society based on matriarchal distribution. In other words, like men who meet paternal values, women who meet maternal values should lead an active welfare society suitable for global society.
Of course, newcomers living in the high-tech era today have equal educational opportunities for women to be on par with men, and with the production of many professional women, they have a mission to become the main body of living politics and implement an active welfare society.
Of course, as a complete democracy balanced between father and mother in today’s global era, an active welfare society will quickly be established if ‘mother democracy’ is established. This will once again be argued on the political side.
Although matriarchism has led to the non-mainstream and is still together today, archaeological data and physical evidence on matriarchal societies from ancient times to prehistoric times are poor. Few women left their names as philosophers, religious leaders, and saint until the modern society was established.
Thus, from time immemorial to this day, one can mistake the world as one’s paternity has led. For example, it can be understood from the fact that democracy based on maternalism that follows from time immemorial is misunderstood as paternal value. Of course, it is also true that people in the world perceive paternalism as superior because paternalism pays off on its own.
And in Christian Genesis, women are denigrated as creatures derived from creatures. In other words, the emergence of the paternalistic monotheism in the Middle East served as an opportunity to solidify the paternalistic society.
This is because in Christian creationism, we firmly believe that the cause of the painful life, along with the short and finite life span of mankind, is due to the original sin of women’s Eve. In other words, it stipulates the fact that a woman, a secondary creature made of a small rib of a male creature, lost paradise and began to suffer in life as she ignored the Creator’s orders.
This belief is the cause of women’s alienation as it is the object of hatred and the basis for justification of exploitation. Thus, it can be understood that it is difficult to realize real gender equality in capitalism formed by Western values. On the other hand, the myth of creation by goddesses exists in the East and other regions based on civilism. Thus, as society developed in the East, the status of women naturally declined.
Anyway, since becoming a dangerous society today, I have learned that being biased is wrong, and at the same time, I have been turning towards departmentalism, knowing women’s superior abilities.
This would be a case in point today’s catchphrase, the ‘Women’s Age.’ For example, women have recognized that ecologically democratic, welfare-oriented women are at a disadvantage as they develop into a neoliberal society that aims to reduce welfare today. In other words, it is organizing and launching a de-capitalist green revolutionary movement.
This is a pre-stage for the globalization of a new system for new people who must live in the global era. Of course, it supports women’s death as a reward for women who have been discriminated against by paternalism in the past.
In a patriarchal society, gender discrimination as a paternal identifier has provided livestock with the ability to fight as a maternal identifier, away from passive life, such as waiting for human disposal and eventually being eaten. For example, feminists than women’s rights movement, women ‘feminism’ claiming for socialism is understandable from the fact that he be fast.
As another example, it can be understood that women’s rights were extended through the male enemy theory of the U.S. Women’s Movement, which took place as a companion, just like a cat’s instinct not to care about mice. Of course, the rule of law tolerates this fact.
Thus, it can be seen that the paternal system should sincerely make it feasible for women who are half human beings to implement a maternal distribution style for a happy life by themselves.
Meanwhile, it is estimated that the maternal community has long been overthrown due to excessive punishment of men or opposition from the paternal system as a result of the abuse. In the ancient Middle East, for example, women would have punished men harshly.
However, given the fact that there was no gender discrimination in the maternal neoconist society, it is convincing that the population growth naturally emerged due to factors such as changes in the survival environment. This is because the matrimonial God-oriented society has maintained a stable society for a long time, satisfying sharing, concession, and a slightly lacking life.
Thus, it can be assumed that women did not marginalize or treat men harshly, but rather because of the imbalance in food conditions caused by population growth and any changes in the natural environment, as if dinosaurs had suddenly annihilated on Earth.
In other words, as the maternal society established agriculture and produced surplus production, it became an unstable society due to the expansion of exchanges, which led to the emergence of the paternity society.
This can probably be attributed to the chronic food shortage caused by increased consumption and decreased production due to war since the emergence of the paternal society. In other words, the resources that were abundant during the maternal society were scarce due to war, exploitation, and others since the emergence of the paternity society.
Thus, the empiricism formed by the Western era of uncertainty led to an industrial revolution by starting democracy, developing science, and then leading to the civil revolution, human beings made rational decisions on their own and resulted in a paternity society.
For example, it can be understood that women are actively implementing green life movements or environmental conservation movements to prevent major changes in the ecosystem due to global warming and environmental pollution. In other words, to overcome the dangerous society created by paternalism bias, they want to choose a new maternalism distribution style at the same time as the end of paternalism.
This is because we knew that the religion we share today is inconsistent with paternalism and human beings who justify unlimited possession, recalling that sharing (love) is consistently conveyed in doctrine from time immemorial.
In other words, despite living in today’s high-tech era, the paternal distribution style has become a dangerous society due to exclusive human relationships and a tendency to belittle lives. Thus, the system of ‘motherism’ was introduced to implement a maternal distribution style suitable for new people living in the global village era.
This is because it is time for wise humans to choose a system to live in harmony with motherhood and fatherhood, just like the dialectic of the thesis-antithesis-synthesis, to live in harmony with motherhood and fatherhood.
With the advent of paternal society, the excessive sexual desire of the cultured men led to prostitution. In other words, it has become a chronic supply and demand imbalance that lacks supply compared to infinite demand. Thus, men’s excessive female bias led to a defensive and passive life as women could live an unhappy life even if they were a little careless.
In addition, although all humans are raised equally by their parents and educated to live like humans, women naturally perceive themselves at a disadvantage in the reality of generalized paternal sex culture. In other words, the legitimacy and accumulation of experience of male dominance based on paternal values for thousands of years are working as a rationality.
This can be understood from the historical experience in which paternalism often endured considerable attacks from paternalism or led to an unhappy life if it did not recognize the sentiments of the world in which paternalism had been rationalized.
In fact, many women think of gender equality as arithmetic equality as well as awakening to human rights through school or social education. However, despite the fact that paternal soil dominates human consciousness, more and more women live unhappy lives through the process of pursuing an open sex culture or deliberately confronting each other while trying to ignore it.
Of course, things will be different for women if they have a certain political force that can carry through the legitimacy of the ‘motherhood’ system. In other words, half of the political power that can carry out their will with the physical coercion of weapons, troops, and police means the establishment of a system that guarantees at least.
However, even if there is a contradiction, there is a difficulty in forming a new political culture in which parents and their mothers can mutually check to achieve a political balance to overcome the long-established and solidified political culture. In other words, we should globalize the matriarchal distribution style that can embody active welfare society, which is the ideal of mankind.
However, Western liberalism was shaped by numerous historical experiences over a thousand years, followed by capitalism as an economic system consistent with the Industrial Revolution. Given the fact that capitalism became a passive welfare state 100 years after the collapse of the old system, it can be expected that history will be developed into an active welfare society.
Because a wise and cautious man develops history into a culture that he created himself to live a happy life. Therefore, it can be expected that human beings will advance from passive welfare states to active welfare through the transition process of neo-liberalism, just as it takes at least decades to form a cultural foundation, become general doctors and act (decision-making).
In today’s global era, the conflict between traditional and exclusive religious cultures of different religions is creating a culture of unknown nationality, but it can be seen as a process of advancing into an active welfare society that is faithful to democracy.
Of course, through this process, we found that Mammonism cannot overcome the cultural differences that arise between the unique cultures that have been formed for a long time in each region and the diverse cultures outside. In other words, cultural beings have confirmed that they cannot live, just like ‘economic animals. ‘Of course, the historical experience of living an unhappy life with imperialism, the result of the rough-and-tumble, proves the foregoing.
Also, as capitalism formed a physicalism that values physical science economies, it was discovered that human beings, the subjects, were alienated as objects. As a subject, we can see that we must live a “life of existence” in a welfare-oriented maternal distribution style in which metaphysical politics and ametaphysics economies can be balanced, just as it is desirable to balance both the mind and the mind.
This is because we can be certain that we are spiritual when we look at the fact that we overcame and pioneered our situation through social cooperation, created a culture to save ourselves with religious spirit, created a high-tech era as a result of long-term progress, recognized our dignity as the protagonists of the world, and preserved our hearts beyond time.
Therefore, it can be expected that humans will live a happy life as a ‘life of existence’ by universalizing the ‘ownership limit ceiling system’ of motherism, a distribution method that guarantees ‘natural ownership’ for human life.
Of course, as the end of paternalism, it would not be easy to globalize the mother-minist system, a new political and economic system that is de-subjective. In other words, it is difficult to establish a new system based on the maternal distribution style as the paternal superiority sentiment is solidified in a rational way.
This is because the capitalist distribution style, which cultivates strong needs for humans, is addicted to solidification. Of course, if motherhood based on the maternal distribution style is established, it will be free from greed addiction of greed. Of course, with the establishment of modern society, active welfare society suitable for ecologically welfare and democratic women has become possible.
Thus, it can be understood that as a male partner, women remain in a process of organizing, like unions, to gain the legitimacy of the new distribution system. This is because men and women born in maternal fetuses from time immemorial are companions, but men ignore women thinking as if they had fallen from heaven.
Not only that, but even though it is time for mankind to develop history into an active welfare society, it is still the mainstream of paternalism, and it is still the passive welfare state. Therefore, considering that the main driving force of human rights to mankind today was the result of the women’s human rights movement, and the women’s liberation movement is promoting women’s rights on its own, an active welfare state can be implemented.
This is because they have the ability and knowledge to be the mainstay of living politics to realize an active welfare society. Of course, considering the fact that a passive welfare state has been established as a result of female leaders with political engineering struggle strategies and tactical experience, globalization of the Momism for active welfare society will be possible.
For example, it can be understood from the fact that the human rights declaration, which was a paper tiger, has become effective as women exercise for women’s rights.
In other words, as a result of meaningful women participating in the association to increase women’s rights, it helped strengthen democracy as well as improve the rights and interests of the socially disadvantaged.
In other words, as a result of the dedicated efforts of excellent leaders, anti-discrimination laws, right of happiness, and right to survival were stipulated in most countries, forming the foundation of a welfare society. It is, of course, the foundation for the establishment of a new system that can realize complementary geometric gender equality.
In other words, it refers to a system in which both men and women can become subjects because they are fellow human beings who have been living together since time immemorial and both men and women are entitled to be subjects. However, as thousands of years of paternal chauvinism, formed by the emergence of paternal society, dominate consciousness to this day, there remains a task to overcome emotionally.
For example, it can be understood from the fact that if women act recklessly to men to overcome inequality today, they often lead unhappy lives, such as violence or being attacked. In other words, in the face of paternal chauvinism, it is reckless for individual women to pose emotional challenges to men, such as hitting eggs on rocks.
Therefore, wise women participate in associations for common purposes or are in solidarity with other organizations, even if they are a small group of women’s movements.
Of course, as paternalism, which was based on gender discrimination, is reversed by the establishment of a modern society based on human dignity, a de-subjective political culture for gender equality to become rational should be formed.
In other words, gender equality itself means the establishment of a system that balances power in order to be substantially equal, as a right without obligation, such as human rights. This is because women themselves should be able to be protected by the power created by participating in the matriarchal association.
Of course, in order to realize an active welfare society consistent with the ecological characteristics of women, women should lead the development of history as a matriarchal coessentialness to respect themselves, just like a labor union established for the workers themselves.
And if women formed by the emergence of paternity society continue to be like bean powder that women are enemies of women, they cannot implement the active welfare society needed for new people.
In any case, the old era, where power and wealth are proportional to each other, has become a grain of sand between women because most women, who had to live in a barren environment, were desperate to lose everything if abandoned by men.
In addition, mothers who changed from women to secondary ones lacked experience due to late participation in social life as they had to be all-in for family welfare. However, in the era of high-tech global communities, humans are becoming a comrade for women to understand women by participating in NGO such as the green life movement for women to overcome dangerous societies.
Also, it is natural for women to be the subject of the maternal distribution style required to overcome a dangerous society full of self-interest. Of course, in Confucianism, despite being completely different from person who is petty and crafty and women, they often disparaged the fact that they ignored women.
However, recalling the remarkable development of women after the establishment of the modern society, we found that it was a fiction that had changed beyond comparison. Therefore, it can be seen that social consensus is needed to form a maternal democracy as a complete democracy beyond a half-democratic combination of paternalism and democracy so that active welfare society can be realized.
Of course, there are views that question the feasibility of the absence of a maternal identity to play a role as a class of humanity, but it will be possible to recall that the maternal society, the parent of the paternal society, has led mankind for tens of thousands of years.
Therefore, it can be understood that democracy should be strengthened in harmony with paternity, checks and balances as a pillar of mankind by establishing a maternal democracy that is consistent with the essence of democracy in the global era.
In other words, it refers to a world where active welfare society is established as a complete democracy that has nothing to do with women leading the world. Of course, female leaders can lead the world today, considering the fact that the matrimonial God-oriented society the maternal one, believed in humans as descendants, and people appointed priests.
Chapter 4. Conclusion We already knew that the poor Ok-soon, who was introduced earlier,…
Chapter 3. The happy life of a new generation 1. A history of human…
Chapter 2. Beyond capitalism According to the French Declaration of Human Rights, "the principle…
Part 6. The political philosophy of the mother …
Chapter 3. Neoliberalism 1. Neoliberalism contrary to the global zeitgeist 1.1 Capitalism that…
Chapter 2. Maternal democracy (Mominism) Suitable for …