According to the French Declaration of Human Rights, “the principle of all sovereignty is essentially with the people.” Today, however, as complexity increases and specializes, the bureaucracy of the administrative state is enlarged and centralized, and the meaning of sovereign residents is practically disappearing. In other words, domestic politics is drifting as the role of international politics increases due to increased interdependence, professional, and complexity in the global era and the meaning of sovereign residents weakens.
In other words, neoliberalism, in which capitalism with anarchic properties has been upgraded, refers to the state in which people in the world are becoming world citizens of global governments. Of course, it would be natural for a world government to be established in the long run and become a world citizen, but capitalism that created hegemonic imperialism would not be able to establish a world government.
This is because, due to global polarization created by neoliberalism, which is the completion of capitalism, most countries are preparing to exit as they condone environmental pollution or cause human degradation due to resource depletion, overfishing, and human commercialization to overcome stagflation along with the liquidity crisis.
Of course, the political and economic system of the mother democracy should be globalized as post-capitalism beyond capitalism, which creates negative things such as polarization, environmental pollution, and prostitution for humanity living in the global era. In other words, a new maternal distribution method for a “win-win life” should be the universal value of mankind beyond liberalism that justifies extreme polarization enough to threaten survival in today’s global era.
This is because it has become a dangerous society that can do anything to survive capitalism that justifies infinite accumulation. For example, the tax burden has increased as social welfare expenses and security maintenance expenses have exploded due to polarization, but it can be understood from the fact that various terrorist attacks are increasing as more real benefits and opportunities are created for the wealthy.
Of course, if you recall the tremendous confusion and killing caused by imperialism, you can see that the stronger monetarism becomes, the more dangerous a society becomes. Therefore, it can be seen that the reason why the green life movement, which criticizes free enterprises that cause a rapid deterioration of the survival environment, is actively developed is to escape a dangerous society.
Of course, the global village era will become a sustainable society only when we live a “life of co-prosperity” with motherhood beyond the “life of conflict” created by capitalism. In other words, the global village era means that women should lead the global government established as a maternal democracy for the realization of an active welfare society based on a maternal distribution style beyond capitalism that gives and gives disease.
This is because ecologically welfare and democratic women are suitable for a democracy that has maternal values. It should be the subject that will lead an active welfare society. In other words, women should create a good country and a good global government without gender discrimination through the universalization of maternal distribution.
Of course, male and female discrimination, which was formed when paternalism dominated human consciousness for a long time due to the rationality of the world, will be harmonized in a 5-5 balance. Therefore, it can be seen that women need to be organized like a labor union on the premise that ‘a country good for women is good for men’ in order to be rational in a patriarchal society.
This is because if a distribution style for the ‘life of existence’ required by the global village era is necessary, it is necessary to have a certain power and secure legitimacy through association. In other words, the mother-in-law who recreates life with the needs of the world has become the subject. Of course, the properties of yin and yang are different in the Eastern philosophy of yin and yang, but it can be understood from the fact that the mother-in-law can also be the subject depending on the situation because they think there is no rank.
Therefore, the new generation living in the global era means that maternalism is appropriate. In other words, as a cultural being that can recreate one’s life, it can be seen that humans should become general doctors to live a ‘relationship life’ in a maternal distribution style for a happy life.
In a dictionary sense, the state is a political organization established in a natural society divided by certain boundaries, and it is defined as a social organization to coordinate social conflicts and perform political functions for order and stability.
In other words, the state is exercised (compulsory power) to pursue values or maintain order, becomes a citizen from birth, and laws enacted by the state can bind all individuals and organizations. As we have experienced through the old era that such powerful state power was helpless when it was abused to suppress individuals, there is always a possibility of abuse in any era.
This has been experienced as a means of maintaining the status system, neutralizing certain groups that hinder the maintenance, succession, and development of power through collectivism, or exploiting it for thousands of years. Therefore, it can be seen that it is a great legacy of mankind that modern society, based on liberalism (individualism) as opposed to totalitarianism after the civil revolution, transformed the state into a functional state, and made separation of powers the principle of state existence.
Therefore, it can be seen that the establishment of a modern democratic society based on sovereignty and separation of powers was not accidentally created as a result of human wishes by removing the old era, which was a society closed by corruption created by the polarization of power or harsh exploitation by the status system.
However, the meaning of sovereign residents is weakening as the bureaucracy of the administrative state, created by conflicts of interest caused by the nature of capitalism, becomes large. In other words, it is the result of strengthening the bureaucracy as the function for realizing a wealthy and healthy society becomes specialized and enlarged in national capitalism that allows planningism (interventionism).
Therefore, it can be seen that capitalism based on paternalism is the cause of democracy’s crisis despite the global village era today. Of course, democracy will be solidified if a ‘mother democracy’ political and economic system is established to generalize economic democratization in order to overcome the crisis of democracy expressed in the nature of maternalism.
If so, it would be meaningful to examine the historical background of why maternal values are appropriate for globalization. Perhaps the ancient matriarchal society was a primitive communist society based on femininity, and as human colleagues, they interacted with other clans, traveled the world in a simple language, and built up a so-called inner circle that expanded their knowledge.
In other words, as a rational being, humans would have been a society where they lived like nomads and traveled around the world to solve their questions. Human beings who built up the so-called inner workings would have been able to live a life of agricultural settlement around 20,000 years while continuing to make gentle progress through such a peaceful and free life for tens of thousands of years. Since then, it can be said that a primitive parental rights coalition society was able to emerge as a faith community, the first state prototype, due to changes in the environment caused by population growth.
For example, it will be the 12 ancient Korea that followed the era of the new mother-in-law who worshipped the single mother-in-law. In other words, the society of the new mother-in-law, which was a mid-term mother-in-law society, laid the foundation for human civilization and became aware of its own cultural existence. It was previously explained that the mother-in-law society at the time had developed agricultural tools and agricultural techniques by women and distributed them all over the world.
Therefore, it can be seen that the early maternal society believed that as a society that depended on nature, the cycle of life was the same as the cycle of nature, and that it lived a life of continuous regeneration of death and life. There will be a specific argument on the religious side.
In other words, it can be seen as a society that laid the groundwork for the historical development of a currency economy from barter to barter, allowing male and female managers to emerge as a society that was able to stockpile surplus with the skills and wisdom of superior women while the mother-in-law new capitalist society was peaceful. It is also estimated that the father-in-law society could have begun when male managers were in charge of increasing population and increasing productivity.
Since then, the increase in transactions has led to the emergence of various types of currencies such as precious metals, which are easy to move their exchange functions and asset values, and this can be seen as the cause of the establishment of a tribal union based on totalitarianism from the beginning of a disorderly barbaric society as it becomes more advantageous to take away or deceive income through labor with the emergence of the private system.
In other words, ancient Korea, which succeeded maternal neo-capitalism, rapidly contracted as the monetary economy was established, and as the paternal society took off as a closed society, a culture of independence of the democratic system was formed by each region. Conflicts and disputes between tribes went through a process of chaos that spread rapidly and formed a totalitarian (absoluteist) state. Of course, Hobbs would have said that the state was necessary as a third mediator to prevent the ‘everyman’s struggle against all’.
Therefore, it can be understood that the formation of exclusive relations between tribes made it difficult for free travel or cultural exchange difficult or caused frequent conflicts by interests due to protectionist tendencies. It can also be seen as the cause of the formation of a winner-take-all culture that has everything, such as confiscating, looting, or degenerating into slavery, as a result of the monetary economy that enabled the ‘life of possession’.
For example, just as they won with God’s help for the legitimacy and perpetuation of victory, they built their own temples for the legitimacy of control and forced repair facilities, farmland management, and road networks as a means of exploitation. As a result, it can be seen that ancient Korea, where the maternal clan society united for religious beliefs, was a fundamentally different society from the patriarchal tribe coalition state as a centralized system created by the father tribe.
In other words, while ancient Korea was a decentralized and open society, the early patriarchal state was essentially a closed society for collectivism and private interests. Therefore, it can be seen that maternal democracy, which solidifies maternal values, is suitable for a system suitable for the global village era.
As a result of merging and merging according to the logic of survival of the fittest, ancient paternal societies created centralized countries such as ancient Egypt, the Roman Empire, and ancient China. In particular, it can be said that the rise and fall of the Roman Empire, which was a strong paternal society, had a significant impact on humanity.
The Roman Empire collapsed around the 5th century, and the Middle Dark Ages (AD3C-13C), when Christianity dominated Europe, ended with the globalization of Genghis Khan, who created the Mongol Empire in the 13th century. Since then, active cultural exchanges between the East and the West have transformed Europe into a humanistic society, followed by liberalism, which tends to be anarchic, as natural law ideology emerges.
In other words, liberalism (individualism) that thinks that there is a state has emerged, contrary to the totalitarianism that there is an individual because there is a state. In other words, he began to justify that the state cannot intervene in free competition to achieve his selfish purpose as the protagonist of life.
Therefore, Genghis Khan’s globalization made Western society perceive absolute existence as an uncertain being, and the liberal trend that followed can be seen as the cause of the civil revolution following the industrial revolution. Of course, the West, influenced by the Eastern yin-yang philosophy that considers humans as subjective beings as microcosms, can be seen as a result of re-examining their academic roots, ancient Greek humanism.
Therefore, it can be seen as liberalism that was created through the interaction between Eastern civilism and Western neo-capitalism. For example, given the fact that Voltaire of the 15th century Renaissance and the Encyclopedia School admired Confucius greatly, it can be understood from the fact that there has already been a long search between the East and the West.
Of course, even though Voltaire himself, who grew up in Christian soil, understood Taoism and said, “Let’s go back to nature,” he would not have been able to understand that Taoism is based on femininity or that Yin and Yang ideas emerged from the mother-in-law society.
In other words, it is impossible to imagine that Eastern Taoism or democratic fundamentalism originated from the mother-in-law neo-mainstream society in Western Christian culture based on paternalism. In other words, Western culture could not understand the fact that humanism, in which humans pioneered their own lives as subjects, was formed by motherhood that recreated humans from time immemorial.
In any case, as laissez-faire based on human individuality allowed harsh exploitation, socialism that valued human sociality emerged to overcome human conflicts, followed by the emergence of radical communism, which established the Weimar Constitution, which stipulated social laws (right to labor). This can be seen as a result of the imprint that humans cannot live on bread alone.
In other words, as capitalism, which aims for a life of possession, experienced periodic panic, imperialism caused by interests, World War I, World War II, and numerous conflicts, it was re-recognized that a modern functional state exists to balance freedom and equality. In other words, modern society, established by the spirit of the civil revolution of freedom, equality, and philanthropy, has come to re-recognize the realization of a welfare state that harmonizes human individuality and sociality.
Of course, in the early capitalist society, the endless confrontation between employers and workers was not beneficial because industrial peace could not be achieved, and society could eventually collapse. In other words, it means that the third-party state has been recognized as a subject for realizing a passive welfare society as a social consensus to overcome the evils of liberalism.
There is also an aspect of overcoming the economic downturn due to the contraction of market function due to exploitation that went beyond the bounds of ill-welfare liberalism. For example, the fact that the market function was restored by the government-led welfare policy or the government investment policy that induced a great compromise between labor and management in order to overcome the 1929 World Depression in the United States.
In other words, as capitalism thought that members of the state consisted of selfish individuals, welfare was an individual problem, but it was found that social problems caused by polarization, environmental problems, or human degradation caused by capitalism could not be passed on to individuals.
As a functional state, it is necessary to create an environment where individuals can live like humans along with welfare responsibilities to cultivate desirable humanity, and a passive welfare state has been established to protect the socially underprivileged and realize the common good.
As capitalism and communism competed for a welfare state and valued the quality of life, and this was an opportunity to dramatically improve the social status of welfare women. It is also significant in that it served as an opportunity for humanity to dream of an active welfare state after humanity experienced a passive welfare state. Therefore, in the course of human history development, neoliberalism can be seen as a transitional ideology as a pre-stage for realizing an active welfare society for mankind.
As a result of early capitalism’s extreme tendency to overemphasize human selfishness, socialism created criticized liberal democracy as undemocratic, and confronted later communism and capitalism, claiming that they were real democracy.
Since then, the two extreme ideologies cultivated by the strong father-in-law soil of the West have contributed to the unprecedented arms expansion and countless wars along with the formidable weapons systems achieved through science and technology during World War I. Subsequently, during World War II, personalization weapons for nuclear weapons and killing people were developed.
After experiencing the living hell caused by the astronomical destruction caused by World War II, which was created in this process, the welfare state was put into practice in detail. In other words, through confrontation and antagonism, it became an opportunity to know that both systems were anti-democracy. Therefore, historical experience can demonstrate that democracy, which is based on maternal values, is an anti-democracy in a society where the paternal family is the mainstream, cannot fulfill its political obligations.
However, even if modern democracy is half-democratic, it is meaningful in that it was able to passively implement a welfare society that is ecologically consistent with welfare motherhood. In other words, it is significant in that it served as an opportunity for women to participate at the forefront of welfare policy. It can also be said that the surge in welfare demand due to the polarization of capitalism has taken a step forward in the recognition that history should be developed in the direction of pursuing ‘life of relationships’.
In other words, mankind has learned from historical experience that capitalism that fosters self-interest is difficult to achieve the public good. In addition, in today’s welfare state, it is difficult to solve problems such as unemployment, the gap between the rich and the poor, and poverty by national planning on the premise of full employment, and the situation is getting worse. Therefore, it can be seen that it is time for ‘mother democracy’ to be established as post-capitalism that presupposes ‘life of relationships’ beyond modified capitalism.
In addition, parliamentary democracy politics is facing a crisis as the expansion of the social security system for the right to happiness, the right to live, the expansion of the administration’s discretion, the complexity of modern society, administrative expertise, and substantial power to make delegated legislation bloat the bureaucracy in an emergency.
In other words, even though a modern democratic society based on natural law ideology was established by breaking the old status system through the civil revolution, the bureaucracy of the administrative state for the realization of a welfare society has become large, the deepening of centralization, and absolute polarization are contrary to the spirit of decentralized democracy.
In other words, the bureaucracy to realize a welfare society was empowered by the expansion of power, and absolute polarization came to be thought of as a new oppression contrary to the revolutionary spirit. As long as paternalism becomes the mainstream of the world, it can be seen that women should have half the power and establish maternal democracy, a matriarchal life politician, to realize an active welfare society.
In other words, a system should be established in which welfare is not a secondary variable option as a desperate measure but as a primary immutable one for human happiness. In other words, it refers to the globalization of a parent democracy in which ecologically democratic and welfare-oriented women can become the subjects of welfare policies and realize an active welfare society as the practices or emotions formed in paternalism interfere with women’s welfare instincts.
Of course, it also includes the meaning of collective compensation that is timeless for women who have suffered considerable damage from alienation due to long-established paternal elitism. This is because, despite the modern society that has declared gender equality, the fact that women remain non-mainstream due to the politics of one-sided paternalism to this day is a social pathology phenomenon that lacks objectivity and needs to be improved.
For example, in reality, women remained non-mainstream due to the politics of one-sided fatherhood, despite modern society’s declaration of human rights of universal equality. In other words, despite the collapse of absolute feudalism due to liberalism that values individual life and the establishment of modern society to create a functional state, women were still alienated from political power, and women’s lives were as difficult as in the past, with a very low social status and an increase in family dissolution or prostitution.
In other words, capitalism, which is based on unwelfare liberalism, which means ‘not receiving’ from the state, was at a disadvantage in free competition due to formal equality, despite the fact that it was inherently opposed to welfare women. Therefore, it can be seen that ecologically welfare women need the government’s protection to become free competition as they contradict the capitalist mind.
For example, it can be understood from the fact that many people had no choice but to starve to death or suffer the devastation of humanity, and that all kinds of tactics and cowardice to achieve cruel colonial rule or wealth, while calling it free competition, have become commonplace. Therefore, it is understandable that women must be the subject of state management in order to be protected.
Therefore, if you want to advance into an active welfare society, which is the ideal of mankind, you can see that if you actually want gender equality, women should actively participate in real politics as the subject of welfare and continue to organize a campaign to realize an active welfare society.
Of course, as a civilized man advanced into the global era, the conditions for realizing an active welfare society that mankind has long dreamed of have matured, and there is a justification for historical development in a way that values the quality of life for a happy and enjoyable life.
In addition, the foundation for an active welfare society has been secured amid changes in social perception, such as the improvement of women’s liberal arts and intellectual abilities, the production of women superior to men, the supplementation of new systems, or the establishment of considerable power.
In addition, it has proven that women, who have been reduced to inferior beings for thousands of years, are recovering their centripetal power to the extent that they are equal to men in a short period of time after the establishment of modern society.
However, with the advent of the paternal society, totalitarianism made up of unionism between tribal countries due to war and violence led to capitalism, which became a dangerous society that induces polarization such as similar violence, and today women are misunderstood as powerless as the number of people being assaulted, subject to sex crimes, or killed increases.
This is because in a society where similar violence such as anti-human violence and polarization made in a world where paternalism has long been mainstream is common, it is difficult to demonstrate women’s abilities in reality, even if modern society was established through the civil revolution.
Of course, women are shrinking emotionally as the patriarchal state monopolizes physical coercion such as police and military power to maintain order and suppress illegal activities or crimes. In today’s democracy, women cannot function as they are not the main agents of power because they are still not the main agents of performance in the one-way politics of the father system, although it is different from the old times in that they can only become the main agents of power and perform state affairs when they become the majority through elections.
Therefore, it can be understood that women who do not have the power to defend against attacks cannot escape the threat of violence as they obey those in power. This is because, in international law, the state is defined as a state in which a government organization is a legal entity that can control the people residing in a certain territory, and the winner of the state is not only a paternalistic national state, but also a non-preditary maternal system or any political system.
Therefore, it can be seen that when a woman, half of the people, claims the legitimacy of “mother democracy” to acquire power and wins as a majority party and becomes the subject to exercise her skills, gender equality can be achieved to suppress violence.
Of course, maternal democracy will become more common in the global era as the instinct of care or inner, religious, nonviolent, and peaceful tendencies arising from women’s ecological characteristics are emphasized rather than the rich and powerful logic of a patriarchal state formed by paternal values. This is because, if modern society has achieved formal gender equality, today as a global society, it can become a sustainable society only when actual gender equality is achieved.
Of course, a system that can realize practical equality should be established if we recall that the civilization era has been achieved as a result of men and women cooperating as partners since time immemorial. In other words, as gender discrimination still exists due to one-way politics, women should reject it and globalize an active welfare society, a post-parent world, to realize gender equality.
Of course, in order to overcome the unfavorable reality of women themselves, it is not to say something clumsy, as if a woman imitates a man in a world where paternal values are mainstream, but rather the end of paternalism as a fundamental change.
This is because, in a world where paternalism is the mainstream, it is impossible from historical experience to look at the women’s problem vaguely and expect automatic control. In addition, as a result of the solidification and development of paternalism, women are facing a new crisis due to absolute polarization, and today’s paternalism has become a dangerous society that must be expelled, along with natural disasters and various types of ominous signs caused by environmental pollution.
This is because the colonial policy created by paternalism became the driving force of the industrial revolution, and the capitalism created afterwards created imperialism and put humanity in a war spiral with the breakthrough development of weapons of destruction by science and technology.
In other words, pursuing globalization with unwelfare neoliberalism centered on developed countries, which strengthens paternalism, is not only contrary to modern society established by the civil revolution to realize freedom and equality fraternity, but also to the legitimacy of progressing into an active welfare society as an ideal of mankind.
In fact, neoliberalism, centered on developed countries, is a result of the logic of survival of the fittest and infinite competition as a result of the era’s spirit, and as a result, underdeveloped countries without competitiveness are in trouble, the centripetal power of developed countries that led the era has been lost and is accelerating into a dangerous society where terrorism is prevalent. Of course, various alternatives are proposed to overcome this phenomenon from various angles, but they are only temporary measures based on paternalism.
For example, today’s neoliberalism, which seeks to promote global division of labor, is increasingly interdependent with developed countries and neighboring countries, increasing the risk of spreading worldwide and causing frequent panic, and it can be understood from the fact that a very unstable and dangerous world is structured due to economic wars in each country due to global polarization.
In other words, it is at a critical level at any time and at any time, as if burning dry firewood. Of course, with the advent of the paternal society, science and technology make the desired infinite possession possible, the absolute polarization created is the justification for terrorism to become commonplace.
As a result, it is clear that wise people should globalize an active welfare society so that they will no longer repeat their unfortunate past when considering the difficult historical experiences of women in an unstable society. In other words, a system that can form a political culture that allows the post-paternal and post-capitalist maternal distribution styles to become common should be globalized.
Finally, it can be seen that the father-in-law and the mother-in-law must progress toward a harmonious society as the maternal centripetal force that endlessly reproduces humans and the paternal centrifugal force that recreates life constitutes human nature. In other words, as human progresses, a life politics that solidifies welfareism must be implemented.
Of course, a system of maternal democracy based on a new distribution style of gender equality would be appropriate in that the mother-in-law recreated and made humans exist, and was raised with motherhood to constitute the good nature of humans.
This is because I believe that a parent democracy state that promotes participation and fosters qualitatively and quantitatively by providing an institutional mechanism to demonstrate women’s political capabilities as the subject of life politics to realize an active welfare society is a good country. There will be specific arguments on the political side.
It can be said that the background of the development of the rule of law in the West originated from the rule of law, in which humans, as creatures, must obey the will and orders of absolute existence for a long time. It can also be seen that the rule of law developed as a means to maintain a strong centralized system as a result of the integration of various Western nation-states by the Roman Empire.
Of course, like ancient China, several peoples were integrated into a centralized system, but the development into virtueism can be seen as a result of cultural differences. In other words, in the case of Eastern society based on Yin and Yang ideology as humanism, the sense of rights is thin and motivation tends to be more important than the outcome, but the West, based on paternalism, is different in that it thought dichotomously.
This may be the result of the development of the paternal society of the East and the West, which succeeded the maternal neo-bonist society, in accordance with the survival environment of each region. This can be understood from the fact that the maternal neo-bonist society measured all things by setting numbers and repairs through the human body structure, understood the nature of objects, and thought of primitive yin and yang theory through the process of giving birth to male and female children.
In other words, it has developed according to the characteristics of each region when you think that the size of your imagination is the same as the size of the universe or think that you understand it as a microcosm yourself. Of course, the preceding facts can be understood through Taoism, which is nature-friendly and similar to maternal values. In other words, Taoism has a much deeper roots than Confucianism and can be understood as the prototype of human religion.
In other words, the matriarch’s society emphasized the only present in which humans can modify themselves and advance as autonomous subjects rather than creatures, and it is possible to understand the matriarch society before the emergence of the paternal society in Taoism, which is similar to the matriarch’s original religion that emphasizes all things and harmony.
In addition, the mother-in-law society is a humanistic society that intuitively and inductively understands things based on the facts experienced and compared natural phenomena through the mother-in-law’s own comparative examination of the principle of the creation of all things. Of course, it can be seen from the fact that Taoism, which succeeded the fresh ideas of the mother-in-law society, and Confucianism, which was created later, were based on humanism.
In addition, it was a society in which the maternal society interpreted the life of regeneration as a three-dimensional view of past life in the present according to belief. This can be seen as the cause of the weak sense of rights by emphasizing duties and considering the tolerant life of that humans as subjects in the East think of the other person’s situation for a harmonious life.
The East, which succeeded the mother-in-law new capitalist society, is a democratic society that believed people as the subjects of Samra Mansang, considered the monarch as the heavenly people, and the people as bilateral relationships for the monarch, and it can be understood that it was a humanistic society that placed the legitimacy of state existence on family welfare and well-being, the basic organization of society.
In other words, the East was a democratic society that emphasized harmony between men and women through the philosophy of yin and yang, and it was a virtuous and autonomous society led by the state to lead a moral and autonomous life so that humans would not be bound by the rule of law. In other words, it was a society that respected autonomy because humans were fundamentally good as subjects.
This can be understood from Mencius’ that virtueism, based on humanism, presupposes humans as good beings. In other words, he firmly believed that as humans were fundamentally good, a good educational environment and through the teachings and interactions of great people could form a good personality and become a saint.
For example, Mencius’s mother moved to raise her young Mencius three times and experienced it, and it can be understood that the basis of virtue stems from the maternal values expressed in motherhood. Therefore, given that Mencius understood human goodness through his mother, it can be understood that the basis of virtue stems from the maternal values expressed in motherhood.
Therefore, after the emergence of the father-in-law society, humans are referred to as vocal beings, but the the theory that human nature is fundamentally good is solid because motherhood is the unchanging centripetal force of mankind from birth to today.
In addition to cutting-edge science and technology, humans are good beings considering that they have long defined themselves as good and bad, and that humanity has been civilized and oriented toward a ‘life of existence’.
In other words, it means that humans are fundamentally good beings as a whole, except for a few, as can be seen from the adage that an loach clouds the stream. For example, it can be understood from the fact that as a creative being, humans can choose to live like animals by themselves, but animals cannot become like humans.
Therefore, it is understandable that if all humans refuse to live a life of prosperity and want to live a life, a system based on a maternal distribution that fosters goodness must be globalized. In other words, if humans themselves want to live like people, they must establish a system that allows others to live like people.
In addition, it is human’s duty to cultivate this type of life as it is fundamentally proven to be good, given that there are countless people who live like the life of a practitioner, who are dedicated to social reform, and who have a sense of happiness by sharing.
As a cultural entity that sets its own values to adapt to the local environment, it can be seen that humans have a profound influence on character formation depending on the social environment or what values are set.
On the other hand, the rule of law was established as the Western paternal society, which deviated from the maternal neo-capitalist society, developed into a paternal neo-capitalist society. In other words, as the rule of law developed in the West under the influence of Christian legalism, after the establishment of a modern civil society based on natural legal ideas, the rule of law developed dramatically, and today the rule of law has become a universal value for mankind.
And the rule of law in the West can be well understood in Hobbs-like countries, which emphasized the legitimacy of an absolutist state before Locke, who emphasized the theory of social contract, appeared. In other words, T. Hobbs (1588-1679) subdivided and analyzed social phenomena in a way that decomposes and reconstructs them through a deductive method to understand the whole, starting with an atomic individual.
Accordingly, Hobbs said that state power was needed to resolve conflicts caused by selfish individuals wanting to be guaranteed rights or individuals wanting to expand their rights. In other words, the state’s role for a peaceful society is important because human society is defined as a “state of struggle for all against all,” and life without a state is miserable and barbaric.
This is probably because Hobbs’ absolute view of state ruled the West from 3C to 13C by Christian paternalism before and after Rome’s demise, but as the Mongol Empire ruled parts of the Middle East and Northeast Europe from 13C to 15C, the monotheistic system suffered great confusion and needed it to revive political power.
Of course, Europe, which was a strong paternal society as a paternal neo-mainstream society, and the East as a humanistic society, suffered cultural conflicts with each other, and in the West, the belief in absolute existence collapsed due to war defeat and became an uncertain society.
In other words, after the fall of the Roman Empire, the West, which transformed into an absolute monotheistic religious empire, came to understand Eastern civilism through the globalization of Genghis Khan, which later became a corrupt society that had to sell indulgences as Christians’ donations decreased.
This can be seen as the cause of Martin Luther’s religious reform in 1517, to overcome the collapse of the traditional religious view of absolute existence and the formation of an unstable society caused by chaos, and at the same time, ancient Greek Hellenism (humanism) was re-examined.
In other words, empiricism based on philosophical relativism was developed, and science and studies based on positivism were able to develop. Of course, the breakthrough expansion of East-West cultural exchanges led by the world’s strongest Mongolian empire in the 13th century led to the development of commercialism, liberalism (individualism), and democracy and science developed as an opportunity for empiricist philosophy to develop.
As a result of the uncertainty about the absolute existence formed by the exchange of cultures between East and West, it can be seen that Western society, where a distrust society where no one can trust, was formed, began to believe in a certain self-existent individualism.
In other words, while the exclusive paternal monotheistic religion was able to achieve totalitarian social integration and establish the West’s absolute feudalism derived from Christian culture, it can be seen that liberalism emerged after doubting its absolute existence. In other words, the West began to distrust the absolute monotheism of Christianity and view it as a pragmatic religion created by convenience, and the Reformation and Liberalism emerged as alternatives.
And in order to overcome the state of “everyone’s struggle against all” caused by considerable confusion and distrust of the ultimate meaning of life formed by uncertainty, Hobbs argued that state interference should be strengthened as a third party for the common good, and there was also a side that reacted to the emergence of liberalism.
Of course, Hobbs’ insistence on absolute monarchy, which justified the oppression of the state to govern selfish humans, would have justified absolute feudalism because it was a chaotic period in which humanism was established outside of the philosophy of the ministry. In other words, he said that state intervention was necessary as a mediator to curb the selfishness of Hobbs’ atomic individuals.
In other words, as can be seen from the Roman Empire and Christian culture, the West was a dichotomous society based on strong paternalism, and it was difficult to escape totalitarianism. Therefore, it can be understood that the Hobbs absoluteist state suppresses selfishness, while the Locke relativist state does not interfere with selfishness.
In any case, women who reinvent humans were discriminated against on a 10-1 level as the patriarchal society transformed them into vocal beings from the emergence of the patriarchal society. In other words, the patriarchal society was expelled by the emergence of the paternal society, and as the religion was separated, the paternal family shared the roles in charge of politics and the maternal family, but since the paternal society became solidified, it has been discriminated against as it has created an ideological and complex patriarchal superior religion.
In addition, with the establishment of the parental superior religion, women were like slaves as unowned and unrighteous people excluded from various occupational groups, including priests. For example, in the West, the monotheistic religion of the father-in-law, which emerged in the Middle East, downgraded the religion of the mother-in-law as a superstition, defined the “Sacred prostitution” for the birth of excellent humans as promiscuous and evil, and the religion of the mother-in-law was extinguished as property was confiscated.
It is ironic that Islam, the later revelatory religion of the absolute god, was established and confronted Christianity. Additionally, the West, which was a powerful paternal society made up of the orders of absolute existence, plummeted the status of half-human women as a result of the development of the paternal societies of the East and the West derived from the maternal neo-bonist society. This is because extreme gender discrimination also affected the East.
In other words, in the Western rich society, women without rights (qualifications) could not participate in politics that would improve injustice, so they were reduced to objects like natural objects because they were in a passive position that only received dispositions without explanation. In other words, it refers to the fact that women without political power were unilaterally degraded into sexual slaves who had to obey the orders of power.
Therefore, considering that power and authority are complementary, it can be understood that women who have lost authority due to exaggerating the authority or superiority of the father-in-law in a rich society, downgrading femininity to the extent of the weak’s excuses, or considering women as sexual beings were not entitled to power.
For example, it can be understood that despite the establishment of a modern democratic society based on maternal values, women have not been able to secure half of their power on their own as a result of the patriarchal society, which has been a totalitarian society to this day. Therefore, it can be understood that in a democratic country, more than half of the lawmakers who are representatives of the people as decision-makers of national policy should be made up of women. There will be specific arguments on the political side.
Before the establishment of modern society, most women were politically and socially alienated and had no qualifications (rights) to participate in politics, and could only participate in religion. In other words, women did not have the concept of autonomy in the so-called political philosophy, and they were in a state of slavery with only obligations amid extreme inequality.
However, with the establishment of modern civil society through the civil revolution, there were some improvements, and after women’s associations gained the right to vote in the early 20th century and subsequently fought for the realization of a welfare society, it was possible to establish a revolutionary ruling party that could not be compared to the old era by establishing modified capitalism. However, it is regrettable that despite the fact that women are half-human to this day, the number of lawmakers and political leaders who make decisions is very small, at a 10:1 level.
Of course, female politicians are rapidly entering the National Assembly and local councils, and the number of bureaucrats and CEOs will increase. However, more problems could arise if women who are ecologically different from men and have unique characteristics are masculineized to compete with men. This is because if a society becomes unstable due to absolute polarization from neoliberalism, a dangerous society will be solidified as the collapse of femininity due to excessive competition or the deterioration of humanity weakens the “motherhood,” the central force of humanity.
Therefore, in order to globalize a system suitable for the newcomers who have to live in the era of high-tech science and technology, it is necessary to doubt and consider the patriarchal state that induces absolute polarization. Then, to solve the problem, let’s first look at the following quotation on autonomy and power relations in the book of N. Bowie, R. Simon, which compressed the arguments of modern philosopher R. P. Wolff,
” ‘The essential characteristic of a state is its power and right to govern. The primary duty of man is autonomy, its refusal to be governed. If so, autonomy and… There seems to be no way to resolve the conflict between state power.’ Therefore, Wolf concludes that ‘I think anarchism is the only political code that does not contradict the virtue of autonomy’. If you read it carefully at least once, his argument here can be decomposed as follows.
(122) N. Bowie, R Simon / Lee In-tak, Socio-Political Philosophy, Seo Kwang-sa, 1986, 32–33p
As such, Hobbs’ absolute power and Wolf-style anarchism are well-expressed in conflict over the conflict between the power the state can command as a right and the inner autonomy (conscience), which is an individual right. For example, a person who gained political power by winning the war is absolute, and the monopoly tendency of power can be understood in the fact that most people are obligated to do so in a state of no rights as the polarization of power is consolidated through a status system.
In other words, due to the monopolization, centralization, and absolute polarization of power caused by the absolutist characteristics of the paternal society, most people would have thought, ‘For whom do they ring the bell?’ For example, it can be understood from the fact that state power cannot protect one’s conscience in order to realize the order to send an individual to the battlefield to slaughter the enemy.
In other words, it cannot be seen as a killing by individual autonomy. In other words, it is the result of institutionalizing and embodying the learning forced to survive in a society based on paternal values and the need to obey power by symbolically implying disadvantages.
This can be understood from the fact that women had to be forced by the authority and power of the paternal society, and they had to learn obedience in order to survive. In other words, despite the fact that the anti-discrimination law for gender equality is stipulated in today’s Constitution, there is still gender discrimination because of the sentiment formed on the cultural basis forced by paternal values for a long time.
This shows that even though women, half of the population in a democratic country, are fulfilling their obligations as citizens, there are only 10-1 lawmakers or political leaders who have the right to make decisions as representatives of the people.
The problem is that it is not possible to implement an active welfare society required to globalize a new maternal distribution style in line with the global village era. This is because ecologically welfare women and men are qualitatively different, and an active welfare society can be realized only when there is a political leader who meets the gender equality index of 5 to 5 quantitatively.
For reference, it has warmed up since about 10,000 years ago, the fourth interglacial period for mankind, but through several ice ages, as a result of harsh experiences like hell, the “life of existence” became important, and the mid-term maternal society, which realized that sharing was the ultimate purpose of human life as a means of survival, had a high level of prosperity and happiness as a shared system. In other words, it refers to a new mother-in-law society as a loose network organization that values individual autonomy as a primitive communist system.
Of course, prehistoric dolmens and symbols that can understand the ancient mother society, and intangible cultures have consistently had cycles of life and religious consciousness, and the mother society is handed down by custom, word of mouth, symbolic records of murals, and dolmens culture, but as the relics are poor, it is difficult to understand them with insight through human ecological characteristics or intangible customs (culture).
Therefore, unlike the trend of material changes in the global environment as an object, it would be reasonable to understand human history as an insight from human cultural and genetic customs rather than proving facts more than 10,000 years ago as materials.
Of course, the tradition of the maternal society remains the most in traditional Korea as a national unit, and it can be understood from the traditional Korean shamanism, which is the dominant religion of the maternal family, and some isolated tribes around the world can be presumed to continue the maternal tradition to this day.
For example, the Heavenly era in ancient Korea, which was based on the maternal of the united, was a society that believed in the maternal monotheistic, and the fact that Dangun Wanggeom, who started Gojoseon as a religious country amid the emergence of a father-in-law state, is the only country that can learn the maternal tradition from the fact that Hongik people have practiced the virtue of sharing.
Of course, it is difficult to understand that society at the time was already in the process of building a paternal state as a tribal union based on force due to the emergence of a paternal society, so it was difficult to understand the fact that it formed a religious power based on certainty as a real person.
As the society became a closed society with the advent of the paternal society, exploitation technology developed to solidify the status system along with numerous disputes. For example, at the end of the Korean Empire, the Japanese forced ‘Japan-Korea Treaty of 1905’, and the absolute majority were poor due to the cause of protection and high-level exploitation technology.
In other words, the attributes of paternalism can be understood through the fact that the tradition of the mother-in-law Shinbonism, the root of Korean national identity, was expelled as a superstition, or that social division was planned, such as ignoring the protagonist of the post-division relativism or losing the centripetal power by imprinting traditional values as uncivilized.
In other words, totalitarian power rule is a batting average and thus transforms it into an incredible humanity that is different from the outside. This is probably because human democracy (individuality) cannot be satisfied due to a batting tendency in a society where paternalism is the mainstream.
It is also because human autonomy, conscience, and the inner world form human nature due to the cruelty of paternalism, and despite having made it present, there is no room to recognize its importance. The problem is that as a kind of group called a wealthy and strong military is conscious continuously and repeatedly to justify paternalism, the conscience as a spiritual being becomes dull.
And as capitalism develops into a smart monster due to mutual distrust between humans, it periodically becomes chaotic like panic, or it repeatedly pays a huge price for human degradation, food chain collapse caused by environmental destruction (ecosystem destruction), and natural disasters. The nature of paternalism can be clearly understood in imperialism, which emphasized that history was dominated by violence and that physical power was real as truth after the emergence of the paternal society.
Therefore, even if a modern functional state was established, patriarchal countries must establish a parent-democratic state based on a maternal distribution style that can ease tensions in a flash as they have accumulated numerous wars, killings, exploitation, violence, fraud, and lies.
In addition, despite the fact that there are many more positive things, such as maintaining good-natured friendships, sharing a great culture, or developing mutual relationships through civilization exchanges, people actually remember more wounds and use them as a means of social integration by stimulating historical facts. In other words, it implies that the unique system of conscience expressed in human spirituality can be distorted by collectivism.
Therefore, given the fact that the mother-in-law society has a shared system that fosters conscience and autonomy, which is the basis of human independence, and that democratic lifestyles have become common and historically developed since modern democracy was established, it can be predicted that it will be historically developed into a full democracy, a mother-in-law democracy, to solidify democracy, which is the ideal of humanity.
In other words, humanity in the global era is a politics to alleviate extreme conflicts caused by the monopolistic paternalistic distribution style, and life politics for the realization of an active welfare society based on a maternal distribution style should be common.
In other words, the emergence of maternalism as the mainstream in a world based on paternalism means that women must have more than half of the state’s power and participate in politics while cultivating women’s autonomy as collisions with paternalism are inevitable.
Of course, a new maternal distribution method in which the paternal and maternal families are balanced should be generalized, given the incredible development of humanity in the one-way world of the paternal system. As a result, it is understandable that the new generation in the global era should be globalized into a new system that can consolidate democracy in order to overcome the unpleasant historical experience caused by paternalism.
The history of the Korean people will be a reference to what requirements a country that is good for women should meet by establishing the Gojoseon (Samjoseon, 2333 BC-108 BC) and then continuing its destruction for about 2,000 years as a new nation led by the Dongyi people of ancient Korea, which played a central role in the globalization of the mother kingdom’s new capitalism.
This is because women’s status and authority were somewhat balanced with men as it was recently reported that women held ancestral rites or distributed ancestral heritage fairly before the middle of the Joseon Dynasty, when Confucianism became a ruling ideology in traditional Korea.
In addition, in Unified Silla, which unified Samhan, three queens, Queen Seondeok (27th, 632-647), Queen Jindeok (28th, 647-654), and Queen Jinseong (51st, 887-897), or the fact that her son-in-law became king and ruled, show that it is a country that has succeeded the mother-in-law’s tradition.
In other words, the identity of the Korean people has a lot to do with the value of the matriarch to this day, given that it is the only country that has continued the practice of matriarch at the national level and the fact that the matriarch priest who succeeded the practice of the matriarchal society tens of thousands of years ago has continued as a religious leader. In other words, the world was the only country that continued the practice of matriarchal new capitalism, even though the matriarchal society was solidified and the matriarchal new capitalism was long removed.
For example, Wu Zetian of (624-705). Although Empress Qi Chen of the Tang Dynasty (690-705), the only female of ancient China, ascended to the throne in 690 and ruled powerfully, Silla was crowned the queen more than 60 years before Qi Chen of China. And it can be understood that Japan was also a country that succeeded the legitimacy of the new mother-in-law society in that it was an opportunity to appoint the queen because it influenced neighboring countries with its virtuous politics.
In other words, it was a key priestly country that succeeded the legitimacy of the Gojoseon, which succeeded the tradition of the mother-in-law New Bonju, despite the fact that the world was already maintained by the Roman Empire and the father-in-law, such as ancient China, when the early Silla was established. The fact that women were at the center of state power in the early Silla can also understand the similarity of the lifestyle of the mother-in-law in the theocracy era.
As an example of this practice, it can be understood from the fact that men and women were relatively equal in ancient Korea, the fact that women are usually at the upper age in marriage, leading their husbands in a desirable direction, and the female priest of religion.
In addition, the study of “Sugi Chi-in,” an ancient Chinese political ethic that means to polish oneself and rule the people, was created about 2,500 years ago by Confucius (552 BC479 BC), and even though Buddhism was founded by Shakyamuni at the same time, it was introduced relatively late due to cultural conflicts with indigenous beliefs and foreign religions based on the Samhan period.
And after Goguryeo was martyred in the 17th King Sosurim (371-384) and Silla in the 14th year of King Beopheung (527), Buddhism overlapping with indigenous faith (mission, religion) began to take root. From the fact that Confucianism was in its heyday in the Joseon Dynasty, it can be understood that Taoism, a so-called Taoism based on the practice of mother-in-law, dominated the consciousness of the people.
This can be understood from the fact that Joseon accepted Neo-Confucianism based on Taoism, such as the scholar culture of the Korean people (referring to the extraordinary female priest of the society of the mother-in-law different from Confucian scholars), and the fact that it emphasized the ” hand-groomed seal” (self-discipline) that is said to be an example for others through self-discipline.
In particular, Yulgok said in his song, “The king makes the people the sky and the people make the sky by eating,” and it can be understood that traditional Korea continues the tradition of mother-in-law.
In other words, it refers to the tradition of the Korean people who knew sharing as the truth and practiced it. This can be understood in the traditional Korean political culture based on the “Hongik Human Zesaihwa,” a national poem of Gojoseon, which aims to realize a win-win life beneficial to people.
In addition, it was thought that practicing sharing was the essence of a happy life, and it was thought that it was human’s duty to live a life in a compassionate attitude, and in fact, the Korean people can understand the above in the friendly fact that they are friendly. This is evaluated as weak in terms of military in Goguryeo, Baekje, and Silla, but it can be understood from the fact that Silla achieved the unification of Korea because it continued the tradition of the Korean people’s maternal society.
In other words, Samhan, which was reduced from Gojoseon (Samjoseon), which succeeded the tradition of the mother-in-law, is a loose complementary country that emphasizes autonomy based on Sinseon ideology (Silla Mission, Taoism), and the international situation at that time was possible because Silla, which succeeded Gojoseon’s legitimacy, had to integrate the three countries and was a Korean people as a cultural nation.
Therefore, it can be seen that the world at the time was united because the Korean people could only survive in order to check ancient China, which was strengthened by the solidification of paternalism. This can be understood from the portfolio strategy of the Three Kingdoms of the One Nation system, which was a means for the Korean people to maintain and survive. There will be specific arguments on the religious side.
It can be understood that the Korean people, who have the ‘culture of An’, which considered motherhood as the center of the family as the tradition of the maternal society, are a cultural nation that recognized the father-in-law and mother-in-law as one axis with different roles. This is based on the fact that the head of the family is the so-called ‘outer owner’ as the centrifugal force of the family to this day, and the mother-in-law as the centripetal force of the family.
In addition, the fact that the marital relationship was organized as a single unit, called “couple-in-one-body”, shows that if the family is at peace, everything in the world is smooth, and the legitimacy of the existence of the country is for the peace of the family. For example, the fact that the “culture of the inside” was clear can be understood from the fact that couples used honorifics to each other in the household of the gentry’s family who founded and led Joseon.
In addition, it is true that Joseon also led the national affairs with a superior father-in-law as a patriarch, but traditional Korea was based on a large family system, so there was little violence against women, and it can be said that men and women were balanced to some extent by 5 to 5 or 6 to 4 in that the elderly mother led the family and played a central role.
In other words, the family view of the Korean people emphasized the family as an independent unit, the smallest unit of the state organization, a place that forms the beginning and end of the life and death, as an absolute space for nurturing desirable human beings. However, it can be said that traditional Korea’s status as a woman was rapidly reduced during the military police rule by Japanese imperialism, and the ‘culture inside’ was eliminated due to violent events.
In other words, while transforming into a heterogeneous society with only administrative and convenient colonial bureaucrats without politics, the achievements of ancient Korea, the history of the long Korean people, and the great identity of Hongik people were denied by maternal.
In addition, the unique “Ahn’s Culture” of the Korean people disappeared as they made them demean themselves by consciously becoming uncivilized, made them feel defeated, and extreme discrimination and violence against women became commonplace. In other words, it means that the “Ahn’s Culture” of the Dongi people, which means a gentle nation, has come to an end as the origin of human civilization before the four major civilizations.
Of course, the “in culture,” which was globalized by ancient Korean East Asian women, is latent as long as there is humanity and is not a property that can be extinguished, so it will be re-established if necessary due to changes in the environment.
This is because the ancient 12 Korea, the first state prototype of mankind established based on maternal, was a good country for men as a mid-term maternal society that systematized the mainstream for tens of thousands of years beyond the age of gender-saving since the sudden appearance of modern humans.
For reference, as mankind’s first network association, the maternal state, which is the prototype of a religious state, is fundamentally different from the one established in a paternal society, but for convenience, it is revealed here that it is named a religious union (Empire).
Additionally, considering the fact that humanity always misses the paradise of the prenatal maternal society and develops history, we can see that paradise is a good world for women. Of course, as Western values based on Christianity, the monotheistic religion of the father world, are mainstream in the lifestyle of humanity today, it is impossible to admit that paradise is a monotheistic society of the mother-in-law, which is based on the monotheistic belief of the mother-in-law, as an archetype religion that predates thousands of years.
This is due to the fact that the patriarchal blood-based society, which was a totalitarian society, solidified the paternal power monopoly and status system, and even though a modern society was established later, it lived as a closed society, seeking to achieve social integration through racial discrimination. Of course, if we develop into an open society like an active welfare society based on a maternal distribution style, we will be able to see that the maternal society was a paradise.
However, even though 200 years have passed since the civil revolution, which occurred due to extreme corruption caused by private interests or collective egoism, a new status system that is not responsible for absolute polarization has been formed, or it can be seen as a closed society as the politics of one-way paternity remain.
In other words, even though it is true that the half-open society created by the civil revolution served as the foundation for a completely open society, the civil revolution remains incomplete. Furthermore, it cannot be said that today is an open society with an open neoliberal society that economically justifies unlimited competition for capital accumulation.
This is because an open society presupposes a ‘life of co-existence’ for a ‘life of existence’ rather than a life of conflict for unlimited possession. Therefore, it is necessary to reconsider the fact that women created the foundation stone of human civilization for tens of thousands of years and that they live in a democracy based on maternal values in order to overcome a dangerous society that runs counter to the global era.
This is because great saints such as Sakyamuni, Confucius, Lao-tzu, and Socrates, the great teachers of mankind, were born 2500 years ago, when Gojoseon collapsed, as a result of the solidification of the birth of Gojoseon, which was the late maternal society following the Mago period, which worshiped Margot, the only maternal god with mythical aspects.
Therefore, it is desirable to solve the current problem by understanding the history of great women who can understand the late maternal society that opened the early (early), mid-term, and historical era with insight.
It is clear that ‘a country that is good for women is good for men’. This is because, despite the fact that the social system has developed into a structure favorable to men as a result of the development of the father-in-law, only a few succeed due to fierce competition among men in today’s era of high-tech science and technology, and the majority of men fail. Of course, representation is being lost in reality as a society cannot fulfill the responsibilities of family support which is the basis for the majority of patriarchal authority.
For example, neoliberalism, which seeks to divide the world today, forms an unstable society due to high unemployment caused by advanced science and technology that requires high education, and the increase in education and family support costs for specialization has made it difficult for patriarchs to bear, and the majority of patriarchs who have been eliminated due to infinite competition in a high-industrial society have fallen.
In other words, in the case of the West, it has long been consolidated into the patriarch’s own rights due to the edict of the father-in-law, making it impossible to reign as a patriarch by traditional values, just like an old-fashioned king who enacts laws that he does not even follow.
In other words, today’s capitalism has reached a highly developed situation, making the patriarch’s responsibility to support heavy as a potential tradition of the old era, while the patriarch’s own authority has been changed to fame due to the universalization of democratic lifestyles, resulting in a new era of cold rice with ’empty Gangjeong’.
Therefore, it can be understood that as a result of raising the level of humanity based on advanced science and technology, most people are in a situation that is less than average, but they are in a sandwich-like position that also bears social responsibility with a patriarchy that recognizes the responsibility and representativeness of family support at the same time as marriage.
In other words, it has become a state of being caught in one’s own trap, falling in a trap set by oneself as it has to compete for survival in a society that has developed to a considerable level that is difficult for ordinary people to handle. This can be understood in the fact that it has become a dangerous society due to absolute polarization from capitalism, which has long been established in reaction to the harmful effects of political monopoly by the father. Of course, it is the result of men monopolizing the social system.
In addition, neoliberalism, which can radicalize the infinite accumulation of transnational free enterpriseism based on advanced science and technology, has become a highly industrialized society due to advanced industrialization, and despite the fact that poor patriarchs due to absolute polarization cannot fulfill their support responsibilities, family complaints and conflicts caused by “poverty in abundance” as a characteristic of capitalism are a direct cause of women’s abuse or family dissolution.
Therefore, if humanity enters the global era of advanced science and technology, it is necessary to switch to a new maternal distribution style if it wants to improve the quality of life, life of existence, relativistic distribution, economic democratization, and active welfare society.
In other words, the ‘ownership upper and lower limits’ of the mother democracy should be globalized to overcome the formation of an absolute polarized society through astronomical transactions in the international financial market and competition for capital accumulation of transnational free enterprises in the face of the representation of the industrial revolution and the information age based on knowledge and information.
In addition, in the era of infinite competition due to capitalist globalization, the majority of the patriarchs are eliminated from the competition despite their considerable efforts, and in the case of low-income patriarchs, they will have to unload the heavy burden imposed on men as a post- patriarchy as they fall into a light-hearted apricot that only bears the responsibility for support without the authority of the patriarch.
Of course, the role of motherhood at the center of life and death by reinventing humans from time immemorial has not changed, while fatherhood is undergoing significant changes due to capitalism and high-tech civilization, so a new system should be established for the end of paternalism and the realization of an active welfare society.
In other words, as humanity, which must live in the global era, must live in an active welfare society, the system of mother democracy, which is mainly ecologically democratic and welfare women, must be globalized.
In other words, as capitalism, a paternal distribution style, forms an extreme society through polarization, Ok-soon’s miserable life can come to anyone, and everyone, whether rich or poor, thinks they are the only ones who have suffered the most, a fundamental change to a system of maternal democracy based on the maternal distribution style.
This is because the fear caused by the numerous pitfalls formed by the nature of capitalism can fall into the abyss at any time and at any time, as in the case of Oksun, causes excessive competition and eventually leads to a stingy life due to absolute polarization.
As a result, it can be seen that capitalism does not produce a happy and enjoyable life, which is the purpose of human life, so it is necessary to prepare a parent democracy’s political and economic system as post-capitalism. Of course, wise humans will not let a dangerous society that goes against human wishes from time immemorial.
Neoliberalism not only reduces the administrative sector due to welfare reduction policies, but also the unstable state caused by the attempt to replace certain sectors with private-centered services can predict the challenges that will come to women. In other words, women are declining into sexual beings as capitalism, which justified infinite competition and infinite accumulation, has become a dangerous society due to the absolute polarization created by globalization.
In other words, women suffer double trouble in a dangerous society where even the theory of political uselessness is discussed as the democratic control and coordination of individual states become lethargic due to the capital accumulation movement of transnational conglomerates from unwelfare neoliberalism, which in principle rejects state intervention. This is because capitalist societies are indifferent to work without income and have the nature of creating political indifference because they are based on economic principles that pursue “maximum profit at minimum cost.”
In other words, in a capitalist society, political power has no practical benefit compared to taking responsibility, as if it were a ‘lightweight dog and apricot’. Therefore, it can be seen that it is difficult to implement an active welfare society in a capitalist system. This is because in order to realize an active welfare society, politics must be transformed into life politics that puts meaning as active service.
Therefore, it can be seen that maternal democracy should be globalized in order to realize an active welfare society suitable for newcomers living in the global era. Of course, newcomers living in the global village era have a long-developed political culture based on paternalism, making it difficult to globalize an active welfare society.
Therefore, it can be understood that it is desirable for the United Nations to encourage the green life movement, in which women are the mainstream for a sustainable society, as international NGOs can be seen as a pre-stage of maternal democracy.
Lastly, a country that is good for women should also be good for men who are struggling today with results such as a power structure that can demonstrate the ability to reinvent motherhood and an ecological welfare instinct, depolarization, a family allowance system, solidification of democracy, and the creation of a cultural climate. This is because when a country is good for women, it is also good for men.
Of course, the international community should work together with a strong will to globalize the implementation of an active welfare society required by the global village era. Therefore, it is urgent to foster talented people and female political leaders who will lead the era of life politics in order to realize an active welfare society as an ideal of newcomers living in the global village era.
Part II. Human Dignity Chapter 1. The Age of Human Dignity The dictionary…
Chapter 4. Conclusion We already knew that the poor Ok-soon, who was introduced earlier,…
Chapter 3. The happy life of a new generation 1. A history of human…
Part 6. The political philosophy of the mother …
Chapter 3. Neoliberalism 1. Neoliberalism contrary to the global zeitgeist 1.1 Capitalism that…
Chapter 2. Maternal democracy (Mominism) Suitable for …